onthefence said:Now you talking like a Democrat. The Democrat Party is all for restricting the rights the American people. They'd be glad to have you.
Bullshit. The liberals are the ones that stand back and, "don't have a problem with it".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
onthefence said:Now you talking like a Democrat. The Democrat Party is all for restricting the rights the American people. They'd be glad to have you.
onthefence said:"You know the one thing that's wrong with this country? Everyone gets a chance to have their fair say."
President William Clinton addressing the people of Philadelphia, May 28, 1993 in the Courtyard, City Hall, Philadelphia, PA
Pale Rider said:That's my opinion. I couldn't give a shit less how you feel about it.
Redhots said:...Anyone who advocates physical violence against another person because that person "attacked" an inamimet ojbect (an object that they own) is a little unhinged in the head or needs to grow up.
...QUOTE]
I dunno about that. I advocate, approve and helped in the past execute physical violence against those who attacke two inanimate objects on 9/11. I am all grown up and my last psyc eval says I am not unhinged either.
Utopian ideals are great in books and on college campuses but are not worth crap in the real world.
Redhots said:What point is that? That the American flag is the same thing as a living human being?
No i'm sure that isn't it.
Redhots said:I think what you want to ask is if I understand that some people get very upset about flag burning because the flag represents for them something important, just like I might view my mother as something important to me.
I understand that.
Redhots said:Now this bit about why I shouldn't be upset "because its just free speach"... I never said anywhere that people don't have the right to be offended by flag burning, or even that they shouldn't. I also said that it doesn't upset me because really its just a childish act, a group of strangers throwing a temper tantrum.
All I did was try to add some perspective to the thread about how other people might view the flag.
And what kind of responses do I get?
Redhots said:Anyone who advocates physical violence against another person because that person "attacked" an inamimet ojbect (an object that they own) is a little unhinged in the head or needs to grow up.
What does bother me is when people advocate violence against someone engaging in that behaviour.
Redhots said:Do you think people should respect your opinions?
Pale Rider said:There's lots of debate in the world about religon. No one can prove there's a god. Most religons as Christianty is, is faith based. Unlike the American flag, which is a tangible symbol of this country you can hold and see. Our flag holds the blood of everyone that has fought for it, and died for it. It's our one and only flag, and I just feel it deserves protection from acts of desecration by zealots and fanatics.
I think anyone who burns the American flag, IN America, shouldn't be allowed to be here. Burning the American flag IN America should carry deportation, to say Iraq. Stand in the middle of Baghdad and burn the Iraqi flag, and see what happens.
Pale Rider said:I'm not here to win a popularity contest. I'm here to voice my opinion. Whether you respect them or not doesn't make any difference to me.
Pale Rider said:I think anyone who burns the American flag, IN America, shouldn't be allowed to be here. Burning the American flag IN America should carry deportation, to say Iraq. Stand in the middle of Baghdad and burn the Iraqi flag, and see what happens.
onthefence said:Are you saying that we should be more like the third world countries that kill people for shits and giggles? What makes our country great is that a citizen can burn a flag and you and I can get pissed off about it. Burning a flag isn't treason. The flag is a piece of cloth. It has thirteen stripes and fifty stars, but is nothing more than cloth. It will burn, but the ideaology that it stands for can never burn. The flag hasn't been bought by blood, the ideals behind it have. Burn the flag, I don't care. I didn't fight for a flag. I fought for for the idea that democracy will overcome and that one day no one will feel the need to burn the flag.
GotZoom said:...you just don't get it.
CSM said:I dunno about that. I advocate, approve and helped in the past execute physical violence against those who attacke two inanimate objects on 9/11. I am all grown up and my last psyc eval says I am not unhinged either.
Utopian ideals are great in books and on college campuses but are not worth crap in the real world.
BaronVonBigmeat said:The attacks on 9/11 were against other people's property. If someone wants to crash their own airplane into their own building (away from other buildings), they should be able to.
And utopian ideals are what this country was founded on.
Funny, still strikes me as unique...BaronVonBigmeat said:Eh, maybe that's not the right word, I just meant that founding a nation with no monarch, free press, freedom of religion, a decentralized government, etc. probably seemed fairly utopian to some at the time.
GotZoom said:A very sad commentary.
You don't see how the flag is a symbol of everything...our country...the people who fought and died for our country, and the ideas that are our country.
When you say the flag is nothing but a piece of cloth...you just don't get it.
Sad. Very sad.
onthefence said:Trust me, I get it. Am I wrong for seeing the United States as something more than a flag? I don't think so. Seeing the red, white, and blue flying over sports stadiums and government buildings makes me proud and seeing Old Glory draped over the coffins of my brethren brings me to tears. The flag is a piece of cloth. Don't tell me I don't get it. You don't get it. If you need a piece of cloth to represent your ideals, then you have none of your own. I love the flag. A direct quote from my post before. "I would personally defend the flag if I were ever to see it burned. I have shed blood in protection in the most holy of symbols that represents this great nation, but unfortunatly, that blood was shed in defense of that assholes right to burn the flag as well."
I get it and I love, but it doesn't define me. If you don't like my opinion, that's fine. Just don't tell me that I don't get it, when it is obvious that you don't either.
BaronVonBigmeat said:Who gets to decide which forums are proper and which aren't? Should we ban flag burning, but allow Koran and Bible burning? Those are "acting" too. Surely burning a bible is more offensive than burning a flag? What about cross burning?
You're arguing a literalist argument for the sake of argument, outside the context of the intent of my statement, and/or the law.
It appears you are more concerned with your individual right to scratch your ass in public than appropriate public decorum. A proper forum would be a setting where an individual/group of individuals can voice their grievances to the appropriate officials in a reasonable manner. Burning the symbol of this Nation is NOT voicing a grievance in a reasonble manner.
I do not advocate the desecration of anything solely for the sake of sensationalism/getting some attention.
I agree that a sidewalk is not a proper forum for flag burning, mainly due to the fire code. It should be restricted to private property. Of course if I had my way, there wouldn't be much of any public property, and private road and sidewalk owners would decide if they want to allow protestors and flag burners, but that's a different thread.
Should peaceful-but-subversive propaganda be allowed?
Would I personally allow it? No. Is it allowed by law in this Nation? Yes.
The constitution isn't a document which lays out a list of what you may do, or a document which states that the government may do as it pleases except for X, Y, and Z. It's a document of enumerated powers, where the federal government is allowed a short list of things which it may do, and nothing more. And deciding what constitutes acceptable expression is not on that list. Granted, this principle has been increasingly ignored for 70+ years, but that's what it actually says.
Nuc said:Maybe this should be the case, but SCOTUS has spoken on this issue and it's not likely to change, so isn't it a bit of wasted energy to get wound up about it? I personally have never seen anybody burning the flag. It's not really a big deal, in fact most of us would never encounter it if not for the media blowing it up.
onthefence said:I don't think the issue is respsecting your opinions. The pattern I have seen is you not respecting anyone else's opinion.
onthefence said:Flag Burning is a civil liberty. It is meant to get the attention of whomever the protester is petitioning. Am I for flag burning? Its not a black and white, for or agianst issue. I would personally defend the flag if I were ever to see it burned. I have shed blood in protection in the most holy of symbols that represents this great nation, but unfortunatly, that blood was shed in defense of that assholes right to burn the flag as well.