Fiona Hill Pushes Back on Theory of Ukraine Election Interference Former national-security official

[Defiant1]

She (Hill) was awesome!

Awesome!... then you believe her when she said the Steele Dosier was a rabbit hole to no where.
Then you also agree that she believes the President was duped by those out to create harm on him/

Glad to see you have turned around.
It's funny, because all you see is CNN's version of her testimony...therefore you don't know she was actually quite helpful for the President on several levels.

She was awesome. Read her testimony. No she wasn't, she believed tramp believes the lies, propaganda, and the conspiracy theories.

Uh huh... she also believed, and put in her testimony, that "many members" of the impeachment panel (obviously talking about republicans) don't even believe that Russia tried to influence the election." Only crap, she forgot or didn't know... that Nunes led an investigation and found overwhelming evidence Russia was putting lots of effort into effecting the election...in fact the report states this in the FIRST sentence. OOPS
She also claimed that BOTH ambassadors met with Guiliani...when neither one did...in fact one of them never met Giulliani in person in his life! OOPS
I can go on.
That is the trouble when you only hear one side of the story.

What tramp did doesn't have anything to do with the Steele Dossier, and Nunes is not to be believed in any way , shape or form. I suspect you are the one who hears one side of the story and believes only one side.

The Senate put out a Russian report on interference in the election and they wanted Tramp.

Yes, we know.
Election "interference" has become the new tar baby. Like racism, sexual "harassment", and domestic "abuse"
No one wants to speak the truth. There was no hacking of voting machines. No votes were changed.

Somehow people in other countries using their right to express themselves on the internet is a threat to the most powerful country on the planet.

 

[Litwin]

She (Hill) was awesome!

only an idiot or a traitor - spy can believe that Ukraine, not "Russia", interfered in the 2016 elections. so who is Mr. trump?



"Fiona Hill Pushes Back on Theory of Ukraine Election Interference
Former national-security official, U.S. diplomat round out two weeks of public impeaching hearings"

Fiona Hill rebukes conspiracy theory – and emerges as a heroine for our times

Litwin,

I have to disagree with you..

They are not idiots... They are be deliberately deceptive...

This is simply put the personal & party above national security.

Now have we seen this done anywhere before.. So that is why Republicans don't think Trump did anything wrong, they are exhibiting the same morals right in front of us.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

She (Hill) was awesome!

Awesome!... then you believe her when she said the Steele Dosier was a rabbit hole to no where.
Then you also agree that she believes the President was duped by those out to create harm on him/

Glad to see you have turned around.
It's funny, because all you see is CNN's version of her testimony...therefore you don't know she was actually quite helpful for the President on several levels.

She was awesome. Read her testimony. No she wasn't, she believed tramp believes the lies, propaganda, and the conspiracy theories.

Uh huh... she also believed, and put in her testimony, that "many members" of the impeachment panel (obviously talking about republicans) don't even believe that Russia tried to influence the election." Only crap, she forgot or didn't know... that Nunes led an investigation and found overwhelming evidence Russia was putting lots of effort into effecting the election...in fact the report states this in the FIRST sentence. OOPS
She also claimed that BOTH ambassadors met with Guiliani...when neither one did...in fact one of them never met Giulliani in person in his life! OOPS
I can go on.
That is the trouble when you only hear one side of the story.

What tramp did doesn't have anything to do with the Steele Dossier, and Nunes is not to be believed in any way , shape or form. I suspect you are the one who hears one side of the story and believes only one side.

The Senate put out a Russian report on interference in the election and they wanted Tramp.

And there you go again, blowing right past the facts of what someone says only to throw it rhetorical talking points you heard on MSM.
FACT - Hill said she believed the President was being duped by some members of his own administration. (in the context of the investigation)
FACT - Hill said the Steele Dosier was a rabbit hole to no where, and was surprised to see it was one of the foundational elements to start the investigation.
FACT - Hill testified that both Ukraine ambassadors met with Guiliani on Ukraine demands... that is not true. Neither one did, in fact one has never seen Giuliani in person ever.
FACT - Hill testified that Ambassador Volker told Sondland about quid pro quo coming from the President. Didn't happen, Volker testified he had no such conversation with Sondland, and Sondland also testified the conversation didn't take place.

These are facts CNN, NYT, ABC, CBS, MSNBC HuffPost...etc. etc. etc. - are not revealing. Therefore you blow right past them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

only an idiot or a traitor - spy can believe that Ukraine, not "Russia", interfered in the 2016 elections. so who is Mr. trump?



"Fiona Hill Pushes Back on Theory of Ukraine Election Interference
Former national-security official, U.S. diplomat round out two weeks of public impeaching hearings"

Fiona Hill rebukes conspiracy theory – and emerges as a heroine for our times

Litwin,

I have to disagree with you..

They are not idiots... They are be deliberately deceptive...

This is simply put the personal & party above national security.

Now have we seen this done anywhere before.. So that is why Republicans don't think Trump did anything wrong, they are exhibiting the same morals right in front of us.

I agree with your assessment. Obama spied on Trump and turned US Intel agencies into his personal Stasi Waffen SS Secret Police and our Progressive Useful Idiots don't care a bit

 

[Penelope]

She (Hill) was awesome!

Awesome!... then you believe her when she said the Steele Dosier was a rabbit hole to no where.
Then you also agree that she believes the President was duped by those out to create harm on him/

Glad to see you have turned around.
It's funny, because all you see is CNN's version of her testimony...therefore you don't know she was actually quite helpful for the President on several levels.

She was awesome. Read her testimony. No she wasn't, she believed tramp believes the lies, propaganda, and the conspiracy theories.

Uh huh... she also believed, and put in her testimony, that "many members" of the impeachment panel (obviously talking about republicans) don't even believe that Russia tried to influence the election." Only crap, she forgot or didn't know... that Nunes led an investigation and found overwhelming evidence Russia was putting lots of effort into effecting the election...in fact the report states this in the FIRST sentence. OOPS
She also claimed that BOTH ambassadors met with Guiliani...when neither one did...in fact one of them never met Giulliani in person in his life! OOPS
I can go on.
That is the trouble when you only hear one side of the story.

What tramp did doesn't have anything to do with the Steele Dossier, and Nunes is not to be believed in any way , shape or form. I suspect you are the one who hears one side of the story and believes only one side.

The Senate put out a Russian report on interference in the election and they wanted Tramp.

And there you go again, blowing right past the facts of what someone says only to throw it rhetorical talking points you heard on MSM.
FACT - Hill said she believed the President was being duped by some members of his own administration. (in the context of the investigation)
FACT - Hill said the Steele Dosier was a rabbit hole to no where, and was surprised to see it was one of the foundational elements to start the investigation.
FACT - Hill testified that both Ukraine ambassadors met with Guiliani on Ukraine demands... that is not true. Neither one did, in fact one has never seen Giuliani in person ever.
FACT - Hill testified that Ambassador Volker told Sondland about quid pro quo coming from the President. Didn't happen, Volker testified he had no such conversation with Sondland, and Sondland also testified the conversation didn't take place.

These are facts CNN, NYT, ABC, CBS, MSNBC HuffPost...etc. etc. etc. - are not revealing. Therefore you blow right past them.

You can't have it both ways, she was either credible or not at all.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

You can't have it both ways, she was either credible or not at all.

Hey pot meet kettle.
Same goes for you bub. You are the one who said "I love her!"...how awesome her testimony was... I never said that.
I said she helped the President on several levels...and how there were large holes in her testimony is THE key level.