Federal judge orders Donald Trump to hand over 8 yrs of his personal & company tax returns

[Billiejeens]

What happened to Mueller's comments that Trump couldn't be investigated for supposed crimes

Didn't happen. Mueller said he couldn't be charged with any crimes he may have committed until he was out of office.

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

False

 

[Billiejeens]

What happened to Mueller's comments that Trump couldn't be investigated for supposed crimes

Didn't happen. Mueller said he couldn't be charged with any crimes he may have committed until he was out of office.

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

Which was a lie. He could comment on anything he uncovered evidence of. Nothing prevented him from saying "We have ample evidence Trump committed crime "X", but we have no authority to indict". He didn't because he found no evidence of a crime.

That was the hack Muehler's way of throwing the Dimwingers a bone.

It's not a lie. It's what he said, in writing. He was very verbose about his reasoning behind his decision to not make any recommendation. The evidence Mueller published speaks for itself. The evidence the Corrupt Administration is withholding from the oversight committees will eventually be released.

Blind suits you.
Maybe deaf and dumb.

 

[WEATHER53]

Local chump judges overplaying their hand again.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

No, he didn't. This is what he said:

Post #66, right before yours. I even underlined the vital bit so you couldn't miss or ignore it.

Actually read #62 which clarifies the underlined point even further. Mueller was asked specifically if he didn't charge Trump with a crime due to DOJ policies regarding indicting a sitting president and he absolutely refused to give that as a reason.

Try reading what has already been specifically posted on this issue. You seem like you won't pay attention to anything
that spoils your preconceived narrative but there it is anyway.

 

[wamose]

What happened to Mueller's comments that Trump couldn't be investigated for supposed crimes

Didn't happen. Mueller said he couldn't be charged with any crimes he may have committed until he was out of office.

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

Which was a lie. He could comment on anything he uncovered evidence of. Nothing prevented him from saying "We have ample evidence Trump committed crime "X", but we have no authority to indict". He didn't because he found no evidence of a crime.

That was the hack Muehler's way of throwing the Dimwingers a bone.

It's not a lie. It's what he said, in writing. He was very verbose about his reasoning behind his decision to not make any recommendation. The evidence Mueller published speaks for itself. The evidence the Corrupt Administration is withholding from the oversight committees will eventually be released.

Democrats have an uncanny knack of misinterpreting the written word. We saw it with the Russia affair and now we're seeing it with Ukraine. Why don't Democrats stop fighting against our country and start doing their job? They're hurting everyone with these BS investigations.

 

[LuckyDuck]

A federal judge in New York has ruled President Donald must turn over eight years of tax returns and comply with a subpoena in the latest legal turn that could ultimately provide information about the president's finances.
Federal judge orders Donald Trump to hand over eight years of his personal and company tax returns | Daily Mail Online



Blowback needs to eat these leftist c....ts alive ggawd dam pigs hope you eat your ownn chit over this to you idiots.

I don't know what the Democrats hope to achieve once obtaining Trumps tax returns. Good example: Filthy rich Leona Helmsley, she claimed that only "little people pay taxes." Result: Massive tax penalties and prison time. If Trump was dodging his taxes, the IRS would have done to him, the same they did to Helmsley. At most, because of legal loopholes for the wealthy, he may have been able to avoid paying his taxes. Not a crime.

 

[BlindBoo]

Didn't happen. Mueller said he couldn't be charged with any crimes he may have committed until he was out of office.

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

Which was a lie. He could comment on anything he uncovered evidence of. Nothing prevented him from saying "We have ample evidence Trump committed crime "X", but we have no authority to indict". He didn't because he found no evidence of a crime.

That was the hack Muehler's way of throwing the Dimwingers a bone.

It's not a lie. It's what he said, in writing. He was very verbose about his reasoning behind his decision to not make any recommendation. The evidence Mueller published speaks for itself. The evidence the Corrupt Administration is withholding from the oversight committees will eventually be released.

Democrats have an uncanny knack of misinterpreting the written word. We saw it with the Russia affair and now we're seeing it with Ukraine. Why don't Democrats stop fighting against our country and start doing their job? They're hurting everyone with these BS investigations.

Written words are precise. The report is damning to the so called President. Time for patriotic Republicans to get on board and right the ship.

 

[Billiejeens]

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

Which was a lie. He could comment on anything he uncovered evidence of. Nothing prevented him from saying "We have ample evidence Trump committed crime "X", but we have no authority to indict". He didn't because he found no evidence of a crime.

That was the hack Muehler's way of throwing the Dimwingers a bone.

It's not a lie. It's what he said, in writing. He was very verbose about his reasoning behind his decision to not make any recommendation. The evidence Mueller published speaks for itself. The evidence the Corrupt Administration is withholding from the oversight committees will eventually be released.

Democrats have an uncanny knack of misinterpreting the written word. We saw it with the Russia affair and now we're seeing it with Ukraine. Why don't Democrats stop fighting against our country and start doing their job? They're hurting everyone with these BS investigations.

Written words are precise. The report is damning to the so called President. Time for patriotic Republicans to get on board and right the ship.

The words are precise, you ficking retard.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Jesus! Hiding behind the Mueller report again? I can see desperately clinging to a raft if you are out in the middle of the ocean.
But clinging to a report that cannot and does not charge Trump with a single crime? That is real desperation.

 

[Billiejeens]

A federal judge in New York has ruled President Donald must turn over eight years of tax returns and comply with a subpoena in the latest legal turn that could ultimately provide information about the president's finances.
Federal judge orders Donald Trump to hand over eight years of his personal and company tax returns | Daily Mail Online



Blowback needs to eat these leftist c....ts alive ggawd dam pigs hope you eat your ownn chit over this to you idiots.

I don't know what the Democrats hope to achieve once obtaining Trumps tax returns. Good example: Filthy rich Leona Helmsley, she claimed that only "little people pay taxes." Result: Massive tax penalties and prison time. If Trump was dodging his taxes, the IRS would have done to him, the same they did to Helmsley. At most, because of legal loopholes for the wealthy, he may have been able to avoid paying his taxes. Not a crime.

No one is looking for actual crimes.
No one thinks there are actual crimes
The left simply wants to destroy the country

 

[wamose]

Mueller said that he hadnt committed any crimes

No, he said he couldn't comment on any crimes he may have committed.

Which was a lie. He could comment on anything he uncovered evidence of. Nothing prevented him from saying "We have ample evidence Trump committed crime "X", but we have no authority to indict". He didn't because he found no evidence of a crime.

That was the hack Muehler's way of throwing the Dimwingers a bone.

It's not a lie. It's what he said, in writing. He was very verbose about his reasoning behind his decision to not make any recommendation. The evidence Mueller published speaks for itself. The evidence the Corrupt Administration is withholding from the oversight committees will eventually be released.

Democrats have an uncanny knack of misinterpreting the written word. We saw it with the Russia affair and now we're seeing it with Ukraine. Why don't Democrats stop fighting against our country and start doing their job? They're hurting everyone with these BS investigations.

Written words are precise. The report is damning to the so called President. Time for patriotic Republicans to get on board and right the ship.

You are blind, Boo. You're just not picking it up. Viva Trump.

 

[Zorro!]

A Star Is Born in the Battle Over Trump’s Tax Returns.

A star is born. The big news in appeals court ruling in the House’s subpoena for President Trump’s tax records is not that the court supports it, though that’s no small thing. It’s the dissent by the newly minted appeals judge on the D.C. Circuit, Neomi Rao. She reckons that the way House is going after Mr. Trump violates the constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder.

Brava, your honor. The chief editorial writer of the Sun has been singing this song since Senator Biden and his Judiciary Committee colleagues launched their attack on Justice-to-be Clarence Thomas. The prohibition on bills of attainder, in which a legislature condemns an individual, are flatly prohibited, both to the state and federal governments. They’re as un-American as titles of nobility.

Judge Rao cuts through the House’s humbug about how this investigation is being made pursuant to the legislative power — as if what the House wants is better laws regulating the president. If that had been its interest, of course, the House would have been trying for generations to pass laws cramping our presidents. The judge gets that the claims to a legislative purpose are gossamer.

The judge quotes a memorandum by the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Elijah Cummings, a major figure in Congress. The memo, Judge Rao noted, said the committee was investigating “whether the President may have engaged in illegal conduct” and notes that this information would inform “its review of multiple laws and legislative proposals under our jurisdiction.”

What the judge sees in that is the committee announcing “two distinct investigations” — “one to explore allegations of illegal conduct by the President; and another to review multiple laws and legislative proposals within the Committee’s jurisdiction. Yet, she notes, the committee “justifies both inquiries under the legislative power,” and, she adds, the court’s majority accepts that framework.

She, however, does not. Congress’s legislative powers, she notes, are “limited and enumerated.” In America, “legislative power does not include the exercise of judicial power to determine the guilt or innocence of individuals.”

The full opinion is here.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oops! Now Trump has lost his appeal to keep his tax returns from the House

Trump: "We'll win," he said. "You know how many cases I've lost and then we win?"

Uh.... Lemme guess... All.of 'em, right?