edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!Can you provide any data which backs up your claims?
The financial statements of public companies are required to account for all exec compensation, including expensing of stock options. Please provide something that shows how including expensee stock options would cause private sector pay to exceed public employees (otherwise, you are just blowing a lot of hot air).
Off topic a bit but a good question regardless.
Can you name one government executive that did not want to be a government executive but was forced to take that job despite no stock options and bonuses?
And again we see how CON$ try to change the subject once their web of deceit has been exposed.I already did in this very thread, read some of the past posts here. I provided a link that showed that an executive at Lehman got an average of $60 million per year since 2000, name one gov executive who gets that kind of compensation!!!
How much in pork do our Congress people get to spread around? How much is the value of their taxpayer funded travel and staffs?
But that is not what I asked. How much of the corporation's employee compensation expense was devoted to executives - and how much to rank and file employees?
At the end of the day, the pay for a private sector company is a privately negotiated arrangement. If you don't like how a company pays its execs, don't buy its product or service.
These questions have nothing to do with the fact that private sector pay can include bonuses and stock options that gov jobs do not and any comparison between the two that does not include all forms of pay is dishonest.