FDA Forced to Retract Statements Saying Ivermectin Does Not Work Against COVID

[munkle]

So when do the apologies come for all those elderly people who died but didn't have to.

‘Blood on Its Hands’: FDA Will Remove Anti-ivermectin Social Media, Website Posts Under Lawsuit Settlement Agreement

The FDA, which denied any wrongdoing, said it will remove content warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 within 21 days. Plaintiffs called the settlement a big win for patients and the patient-physician relationship.

childrenshealthdefense.org

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.

Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””

Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock

A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:

“Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies. 61 studies from 55 independent teams in 25 different countries show statistically significant improvements.

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 85% [77‑90%] lower risk for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results for higher quality studies, primary outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”

 

[boevans]

The settlement does not sat ivermectin works against Covid 19, only that the agency exceeded it statutory authority to tell the professional field what it must do,

 

[rampart]

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

to be clear : ivermectin is not tested or approved to treat covid or mudh else ourside of intestinal parasites.

some doofus winning a case for "free speech" does NOT make a drug effective.

my brother works for a sprawling state wide hospital system , in a red state, that has several wards for covid patients but NO COViD VACCINE WARDS.

a problem this great certainly calls for study. how much has congress appropriated for research into these deadly vaccine side effects?

 

[WEATHER53]

So much of this we stated right from the start and were censored, deleted and threatened.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So when do the apologies come for all those elderly people who died but didn't have to.

‘Blood on Its Hands’: FDA Will Remove Anti-ivermectin Social Media, Website Posts Under Lawsuit Settlement Agreement

The FDA, which denied any wrongdoing, said it will remove content warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 within 21 days. Plaintiffs called the settlement a big win for patients and the patient-physician relationship.

childrenshealthdefense.org

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.

Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””

Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock

A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:

“Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies. 61 studies from 55 independent teams in 25 different countries show statistically significant improvements.

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 85% [77‑90%] lower risk for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results for higher quality studies, primary outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”

No. They were forced to retract their website information that said doctors couldn't prescribe it and they had to apologize for and retract their website information mocking the doctors who sued them.
The settlement was an admission that the FDA overstepped its bounds. Not an admission that the drug works....because it doesn't.
Ivermectin has been found to not be effective in treating COVID-19.

 

[candycorn]

If the OP told the truth, we’d all die from shock.

 

[Jarlaxle]

No. They were forced to retract their website information that said doctors couldn't prescribe it and they had to apologize for and retract their website information mocking the doctors who sued them.
The settlement was an admission that the FDA overstepped its bounds. Not an admission that the drug works....because it doesn't.
Ivermectin has been found to not be effective in treating COVID-19.

You're lying.

 

[progressive hunter]

to be clear : ivermectin is not tested or approved to treat covid or mudh else ourside of intestinal parasites.

some doofus winning a case for "free speech" does NOT make a drug effective.

my brother works for a sprawling state wide hospital system , in a red state, that has several wards for covid patients but NO COViD VACCINE WARDS.

a problem this great certainly calls for study. how much has congress appropriated for research into these deadly vaccine side effects?

just because it hasnt been tested or approved doesnt mean it doesnt help,,

its a safe drug and people should be allowed to try anything they want,, more so when the option is death,,

 

[The Irish Ram]

Ivermectin is one of the most widely used drugs in the world and is so successful it won a Nobel Prize. It is no more a horse drug than tetracycline is a fish drug. It is just happens to work well on them too. But the really big news about Ivermectin is the 100% cancer remission studies that are being conducted!

Ivermectin, as an old anti-parasite drug, can suppress almost completely the growth of various human cancers, including ovarian cancer.

Studies demonstrated that ivermectin, in addition to the classic antiparasitic function, has an antitumor action, in different types of tumors.

 

[rampart]

The settlement does not sat ivermectin works against Covid 19, only that the agency exceeded it statutory authority to tell the professional field what it must do,

wish i'd read yours first. i kind if went too far,

 

[The Irish Ram]

And you can buy it, made in America.

Anti-Parasite drug Ivermectin shows promise against cancer | Ultimate in Integrative Holistic Cancer Therapy, Houston, Texas

A common anti-parasitic drug known as Ivermectin was recently found to have anti-cancer properties. Is it effective? What does the research say? Let’s explore. What is Ivermectin Used For? Ivermectin is commonly used as an anti-parasitic drug used to treat strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis...

i2b.us

 

[WEATHER53]

Lib loons slandered it and derided us for using horse deworming paste
They were and still are Absolutely Wedded to the Hoax

 

[Moonglow]

And you can buy it, made in America.

My horse refuses to take it.

 

[Moonglow]

Lib loons slandered it and derided us for using horse deworming paste
They were and still are Absolutely Wedded to the Hoax

I am sure the suppository form was the most used.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You're lying.

There's no lie in the truth.
Ivermectin is not effective in treating COVID-19.
It is effective in treating water and food borne parasites...which is what it's been approved for

But, you are free to deworm yourself. And your doctor can prescribe it for you if they believe it will help your COVID symptoms.

 

[Jarlaxle]

There's no lie in the truth.
Ivermectin is not effective in treating COVID-19.
It is effective in treating water and food borne parasites...which is what it's been approved for

But, you are free to deworm yourself. And your doctor can prescribe it for you if they believe it will help your COVID symptoms.

You.
Are.
Lying.

 

[progressive hunter]

There's no lie in the truth.
Ivermectin is not effective in treating COVID-19.
It is effective in treating water and food borne parasites...which is what it's been approved for

But, you are free to deworm yourself. And your doctor can prescribe it for you if they believe it will help your COVID symptoms.

beings that a virus is nothing more than a form of parasite whats your qualifications to back up you saying it is not effective against covid??

 

[WEATHER53]

I am sure the suppository form was the most used.

You are one of the top 10 liars about the Covid hoax and were a Huge Advocate for imprisonment of those who did not share your pitiful fears

 

[progressive hunter]

There's no lie in the truth.
Ivermectin is not effective in treating COVID-19.
It is effective in treating water and food borne parasites...which is what it's been approved for

But, you are free to deworm yourself. And your doctor can prescribe it for you if they believe it will help your COVID symptoms.

Viruses are small obligate intracellular parasites, which by definition contain either a RNA or DNA genome surrounded by a protective, virus-coded protein coat. Viruses may be viewed as mobile genetic elements, most probably of cellular origin and characterized by a long co-evolution of virus and host.

Structure and Classification of Viruses - PubMed

Viruses are small obligate intracellular parasites, which by definition contain either a RNA or DNA genome surrounded by a protective, virus-coded protein coat. Viruses may be viewed as mobile genetic elements, most probably of cellular origin and characterized by a long co-evolution of virus...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Orangecat]

So when do the apologies come for all those elderly people who died but didn't have to.

‘Blood on Its Hands’: FDA Will Remove Anti-ivermectin Social Media, Website Posts Under Lawsuit Settlement Agreement

The FDA, which denied any wrongdoing, said it will remove content warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 within 21 days. Plaintiffs called the settlement a big win for patients and the patient-physician relationship.

childrenshealthdefense.org

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.

Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””

Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock

A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:

“Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies. 61 studies from 55 independent teams in 25 different countries show statistically significant improvements.

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 85% [77‑90%] lower risk for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results for higher quality studies, primary outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”

Crickets from all the fuck-knuckle useful idiots who mindlessly bleated “horse paste”.