FBI: Hillary Crime - 'Gross Negligence Provision'; Obama, Like with Holder, To the Rescue?!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,087
2,645
Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

FBI is now focused on whether there were violations of an Espionage Act subsection pertaining to "gross negligence" in the safekeeping of national defense information.

Considering, at the very least, her highly classified server was found in the BATHROOM of a small IT company that did not have the security clearance or adequate safe guards to store and maintain TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information, saying Hillary is guilty of 'gross negligence' in safeguarding such highly classified information is not unlu undeniable but is also being extremely kind.

"Under 18 USC 793 subsection F, the information does not have to be classified to count as a violation. The intelligence source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitivity of the ongoing probe, said the subsection requires the "lawful possession" of national defense information by a security clearance holder who "through gross negligence," such as the use of an unsecure computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper, secure location.

Subsection F also requires the clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer. "A failure to do so "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."


Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

(Of course no charges have been filed or will be for a while, if they will be, because the investigation is still on-going.)

The last sentence is especially important to note because HERE is Hillary's 'out'. Out of the many charges that could be filed, such as several counts of Felony Perjury, which have been proven, I believe on the charge of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act will be filed, and Hillary will walk away in the end with a FINE, no prison term. As a result; however, the law demands her security clearance be STRIPPED. Hard to be President when you have no security clearance because you have been proven to be incapable of being entrusted with classified material.


Hillary's 'unethical / criminal' career began by being booted from the Watergate Legal Team for unethical behavior. Bill Clinton was charged with Contempt of Court and had his license to practice law stripped in the 1st-ever case of a sitting President being taken to court (for sexual harassment). Now Hillary is on the verge, possibly, of ending her political career much the way it 'started'....

...but not if President Barak Obama has anything to say about it!

Obamaā€™s Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
- http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/u...ton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0

Once again, before knowing any of the details, Obama is wading into the middle of an issue....

"Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintonā€™s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.

ā€œI donā€™t think it posed a national security problem,ā€ Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSā€™s ā€œ60 Minutes.ā€ He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: ā€œThis is not a situation in which Americaā€™s national security was endangered.ā€


Nice OPINION, but unless Barry has access to the FBI's files and investigation notes he is spewing nothing more than OPINION, and once again NOT based on any FACTS of the case. Unlike most other times when he has said he could not comment on on-going investigations, Obama could not help but interject himself into THIS issue.

"Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintonā€™s email setup had in fact put any of the nationā€™s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.

Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing."


The WH has since offered a retraction / clarification of Obama's comments, insisting he was not trying to influence the investigation.


 
FOX news is going all out to try to twist the situation and is comparing her to a man who specifically took government emails and sent them to the Press.....

laughable!!! :lol::lol::lol:
 
FOX news is going all out ....

They reported what the FBI said.....

So you don't think leaving a Computer Server containing highly Classified TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information in the BATHROOM of a small IT company run out of an apartment whose employees do NOT have the legally required security clearances or the legally required security precautions / measures to store, handle, and maintain such highly classified material is not, at the least, 'gross negligence'?!
 
Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

FBI is now focused on whether there were violations of an Espionage Act subsection pertaining to "gross negligence" in the safekeeping of national defense information.

Considering, at the very least, her highly classified server was found in the BATHROOM of a small IT company that did not have the security clearance or adequate safe guards to store and maintain TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information, saying Hillary is guilty of 'gross negligence' in safeguarding such highly classified information is not unlu undeniable but is also being extremely kind.

"Under 18 USC 793 subsection F, the information does not have to be classified to count as a violation. The intelligence source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitivity of the ongoing probe, said the subsection requires the "lawful possession" of national defense information by a security clearance holder who "through gross negligence," such as the use of an unsecure computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper, secure location.

Subsection F also requires the clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer. "A failure to do so "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."


Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

(Of course no charges have been filed or will be for a while, if they will be, because the investigation is still on-going.)

The last sentence is especially important to note because HERE is Hillary's 'out'. Out of the many charges that could be filed, such as several counts of Felony Perjury, which have been proven, I believe on the charge of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act will be filed, and Hillary will walk away in the end with a FINE, no prison term. As a result; however, the law demands her security clearance be STRIPPED. Hard to be President when you have no security clearance because you have been proven to be incapable of being entrusted with classified material.


Hillary's 'unethical / criminal' career began by being booted from the Watergate Legal Team for unethical behavior. Bill Clinton was charged with Contempt of Court and had his license to practice law stripped in the 1st-ever case of a sitting President being taken to court (for sexual harassment). Now Hillary is on the verge, possibly, of ending her political career much the way it 'started'....

...but not if President Barak Obama has anything to say about it!

Obamaā€™s Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
- http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/u...ton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0

Once again, before knowing any of the details, Obama is wading into the middle of an issue....

"Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintonā€™s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.


ā€œI donā€™t think it posed a national security problem,ā€ Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSā€™s ā€œ60 Minutes.ā€ He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: ā€œThis is not a situation in which Americaā€™s national security was endangered.ā€

Nice OPINION, but unless Barry has access to the FBI's files and investigation notes he is spewing nothing more than OPINION, and once again NOT based on any FACTS of the case. Unlike most other times when he has said he could not comment on on-going investigations, Obama could not help but interject himself into THIS issue.

"Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintonā€™s email setup had in fact put any of the nationā€™s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing."

The WH has since offered a retraction / clarification of Obama's comments, insisting he was not trying to influence the investigation.

Any rank and file government employee who did far less than Hillary would have lost his job, his security clearance, and have been fined and jailed. If Hillary gets away with this, every lawyer who represents a government employee in any future prosecution will have ample case history to argue for his client's acquittal.
 
I see some are waking up to the fact that the elite are treated quite differently under the law than average citizens, government is corrupt told you so.
 
Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

FBI is now focused on whether there were violations of an Espionage Act subsection pertaining to "gross negligence" in the safekeeping of national defense information.

Considering, at the very least, her highly classified server was found in the BATHROOM of a small IT company that did not have the security clearance or adequate safe guards to store and maintain TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information, saying Hillary is guilty of 'gross negligence' in safeguarding such highly classified information is not unlu undeniable but is also being extremely kind.

"Under 18 USC 793 subsection F, the information does not have to be classified to count as a violation. The intelligence source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitivity of the ongoing probe, said the subsection requires the "lawful possession" of national defense information by a security clearance holder who "through gross negligence," such as the use of an unsecure computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper, secure location.

Subsection F also requires the clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer. "A failure to do so "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."


Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

(Of course no charges have been filed or will be for a while, if they will be, because the investigation is still on-going.)

The last sentence is especially important to note because HERE is Hillary's 'out'. Out of the many charges that could be filed, such as several counts of Felony Perjury, which have been proven, I believe on the charge of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act will be filed, and Hillary will walk away in the end with a FINE, no prison term. As a result; however, the law demands her security clearance be STRIPPED. Hard to be President when you have no security clearance because you have been proven to be incapable of being entrusted with classified material.


Hillary's 'unethical / criminal' career began by being booted from the Watergate Legal Team for unethical behavior. Bill Clinton was charged with Contempt of Court and had his license to practice law stripped in the 1st-ever case of a sitting President being taken to court (for sexual harassment). Now Hillary is on the verge, possibly, of ending her political career much the way it 'started'....

...but not if President Barak Obama has anything to say about it!

Obamaā€™s Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
- http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/u...ton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0

Once again, before knowing any of the details, Obama is wading into the middle of an issue....

"Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintonā€™s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.


ā€œI donā€™t think it posed a national security problem,ā€ Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSā€™s ā€œ60 Minutes.ā€ He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: ā€œThis is not a situation in which Americaā€™s national security was endangered.ā€

Nice OPINION, but unless Barry has access to the FBI's files and investigation notes he is spewing nothing more than OPINION, and once again NOT based on any FACTS of the case. Unlike most other times when he has said he could not comment on on-going investigations, Obama could not help but interject himself into THIS issue.

"Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintonā€™s email setup had in fact put any of the nationā€™s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing."

The WH has since offered a retraction / clarification of Obama's comments, insisting he was not trying to influence the investigation.

Any rank and file government employee who did far less than Hillary would have lost his job, his security clearance, and have been fined and jailed. If Hillary gets away with this, every lawyer who represents a government employee in any future prosecution will have ample case history to argue for his client's acquittal.

Gee, too bad Jeb Bush did the exact same thing.
 
Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

FBI is now focused on whether there were violations of an Espionage Act subsection pertaining to "gross negligence" in the safekeeping of national defense information.

Considering, at the very least, her highly classified server was found in the BATHROOM of a small IT company that did not have the security clearance or adequate safe guards to store and maintain TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information, saying Hillary is guilty of 'gross negligence' in safeguarding such highly classified information is not unlu undeniable but is also being extremely kind.

"Under 18 USC 793 subsection F, the information does not have to be classified to count as a violation. The intelligence source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitivity of the ongoing probe, said the subsection requires the "lawful possession" of national defense information by a security clearance holder who "through gross negligence," such as the use of an unsecure computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper, secure location.

Subsection F also requires the clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer. "A failure to do so "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."


Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

(Of course no charges have been filed or will be for a while, if they will be, because the investigation is still on-going.)

The last sentence is especially important to note because HERE is Hillary's 'out'. Out of the many charges that could be filed, such as several counts of Felony Perjury, which have been proven, I believe on the charge of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act will be filed, and Hillary will walk away in the end with a FINE, no prison term. As a result; however, the law demands her security clearance be STRIPPED. Hard to be President when you have no security clearance because you have been proven to be incapable of being entrusted with classified material.


Hillary's 'unethical / criminal' career began by being booted from the Watergate Legal Team for unethical behavior. Bill Clinton was charged with Contempt of Court and had his license to practice law stripped in the 1st-ever case of a sitting President being taken to court (for sexual harassment). Now Hillary is on the verge, possibly, of ending her political career much the way it 'started'....

...but not if President Barak Obama has anything to say about it!

Obamaā€™s Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
- http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/u...ton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0

Once again, before knowing any of the details, Obama is wading into the middle of an issue....

"Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintonā€™s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.


ā€œI donā€™t think it posed a national security problem,ā€ Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSā€™s ā€œ60 Minutes.ā€ He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: ā€œThis is not a situation in which Americaā€™s national security was endangered.ā€

Nice OPINION, but unless Barry has access to the FBI's files and investigation notes he is spewing nothing more than OPINION, and once again NOT based on any FACTS of the case. Unlike most other times when he has said he could not comment on on-going investigations, Obama could not help but interject himself into THIS issue.

"Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintonā€™s email setup had in fact put any of the nationā€™s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing."

The WH has since offered a retraction / clarification of Obama's comments, insisting he was not trying to influence the investigation.

Any rank and file government employee who did far less than Hillary would have lost his job, his security clearance, and have been fined and jailed. If Hillary gets away with this, every lawyer who represents a government employee in any future prosecution will have ample case history to argue for his client's acquittal.

Gee, too bad Jeb Bush did the exact same thing.

I must have missed the "Jeb Bush is Secretary of State" era...
 
Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

FBI is now focused on whether there were violations of an Espionage Act subsection pertaining to "gross negligence" in the safekeeping of national defense information.

Considering, at the very least, her highly classified server was found in the BATHROOM of a small IT company that did not have the security clearance or adequate safe guards to store and maintain TOP SECRET TS/SI/TK information, saying Hillary is guilty of 'gross negligence' in safeguarding such highly classified information is not unlu undeniable but is also being extremely kind.

"Under 18 USC 793 subsection F, the information does not have to be classified to count as a violation. The intelligence source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitivity of the ongoing probe, said the subsection requires the "lawful possession" of national defense information by a security clearance holder who "through gross negligence," such as the use of an unsecure computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper, secure location.

Subsection F also requires the clearance holder "to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer. "A failure to do so "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."


Source: FBI probe of Clinton email focused on ā€˜gross negligenceā€™ provision

(Of course no charges have been filed or will be for a while, if they will be, because the investigation is still on-going.)

The last sentence is especially important to note because HERE is Hillary's 'out'. Out of the many charges that could be filed, such as several counts of Felony Perjury, which have been proven, I believe on the charge of 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act will be filed, and Hillary will walk away in the end with a FINE, no prison term. As a result; however, the law demands her security clearance be STRIPPED. Hard to be President when you have no security clearance because you have been proven to be incapable of being entrusted with classified material.


Hillary's 'unethical / criminal' career began by being booted from the Watergate Legal Team for unethical behavior. Bill Clinton was charged with Contempt of Court and had his license to practice law stripped in the 1st-ever case of a sitting President being taken to court (for sexual harassment). Now Hillary is on the verge, possibly, of ending her political career much the way it 'started'....

...but not if President Barak Obama has anything to say about it!

Obamaā€™s Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
- http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/u...ton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0

Once again, before knowing any of the details, Obama is wading into the middle of an issue....

"Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintonā€™s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.


ā€œI donā€™t think it posed a national security problem,ā€ Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSā€™s ā€œ60 Minutes.ā€ He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: ā€œThis is not a situation in which Americaā€™s national security was endangered.ā€

Nice OPINION, but unless Barry has access to the FBI's files and investigation notes he is spewing nothing more than OPINION, and once again NOT based on any FACTS of the case. Unlike most other times when he has said he could not comment on on-going investigations, Obama could not help but interject himself into THIS issue.

"Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintonā€™s email setup had in fact put any of the nationā€™s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing."

The WH has since offered a retraction / clarification of Obama's comments, insisting he was not trying to influence the investigation.

Any rank and file government employee who did far less than Hillary would have lost his job, his security clearance, and have been fined and jailed. If Hillary gets away with this, every lawyer who represents a government employee in any future prosecution will have ample case history to argue for his client's acquittal.

Gee, too bad Jeb Bush did the exact same thing.

News to me that Jeb Bush ever held a position in the federal government.
 

Forum List

Back
Top