FBI caves, will let Comer’s full committee see Biden bribery document

Bill Barr's DOJ found nothing, and it comes from a Giuliani source, so it's likely all made up. :)

It had nothing to do with Guiliani. Do try to keep up.

Not so, according to an individual familiar with the investigation who told The Federalist that the CHS and the FD-1023 summary of his statement were both “unrelated to Rudy Giuliani” and “not derived” from any information Giuliani provided. This corroborates the House Oversight Committee’s representation that the June 30, 2020, FD-1023 “stands on its own” and was not part of the documents Giuliani provided the FBI in January 2020.

In fact, according to the House Oversight Committee, the FD-1023 in question “contains information from the FBI’s confidential human source dating back to another FD-1023 generated in 2017,” which completely removes Giuliani from the mix.
 
The committee needs to release the document to the public ASAP after they look at it. There's no sense in keeping it from us. Wray covering for Biden needs to end.


Eleven hours before the House Oversight Committee would assemble to vote on holding FBI Director Wray in Contempt of Congress, the FBI agreed to permit members of the Oversight Committee to review an unclassified informant file that allegedly links President Joe Biden to a $5 million bribery scheme.

Wednesday evening, Comer canceled the 9 a.m. Thursday vote to hold Wray in contempt. In exchange, the FBI finally agreed to allow the members to review the document, a demand on which Comer insisted from nearly the beginning of the negotiations.



How do we know the FBI won’t create a new, whitewashed document? They had a lot of time to do that while Wray refused to turn over the evidence.
 
It had nothing to do with Guiliani. Do try to keep up.

Not so, according to an individual familiar with the investigation who told The Federalist that the CHS and the FD-1023 summary of his statement were both “unrelated to Rudy Giuliani” and “not derived” from any information Giuliani provided. This corroborates the House Oversight Committee’s representation that the June 30, 2020, FD-1023 “stands on its own” and was not part of the documents Giuliani provided the FBI in January 2020.

In fact, according to the House Oversight Committee, the FD-1023 in question “contains information from the FBI’s confidential human source dating back to another FD-1023 generated in 2017,” which completely removes Giuliani from the mix.
So what did the Delaware office who Barr sent the FD 1023 find out? It's been 3 years??
 
How do we know the FBI won’t create a new, whitewashed document? They had a lot of time to do that while Wray refused to turn over the evidence.
Comer and Grassley had already seen it. They know everything that is in the form already, before viewing the form from the FBI....

Did they get it from the whistle blower directly???

The whistle blower was told by a foreign national that he paid Joe Biden $5 million for influence on policies.

The whistle blower reported this accusation claim from the foreign national recorded on a FD 1023, to the FBI.

The whistle blower was not a witness, he relayed what the foreign national claimed.
 
Biden and Trump busted at the same time would be a dream come true.
 
The gestapo on the march.

"The FBI’s attempt to ban Twitter accounts at the request of Ukrainian intelligence is among the most overt requests for censorship revealed to date in the Twitter Files, a cache of leaked communications from the social media giant."

 
I thought Comer had already seen the document.
May have been a redacted document.

1686236242832.jpeg
 
The committee needs to release the document to the public ASAP after they look at it. There's no sense in keeping it from us. Wray covering for Biden needs to end.


Eleven hours before the House Oversight Committee would assemble to vote on holding FBI Director Wray in Contempt of Congress, the FBI agreed to permit members of the Oversight Committee to review an unclassified informant file that allegedly links President Joe Biden to a $5 million bribery scheme.

Wednesday evening, Comer canceled the 9 a.m. Thursday vote to hold Wray in contempt. In exchange, the FBI finally agreed to allow the members to review the document, a demand on which Comer insisted from nearly the beginning of the negotiations.




I love how the mega cult calls, every slight concession a “major victory”.

Comer got nothing. He gets to see a document that has been discredited by Bill Barr, and John Durham, in the entire Trump justice department.

The FBI has had this document for years. They thoroughly investigated it and found it was of no value. Even colour admits. He doesn’t care if the document is true or not, he just wants to discredit Joe Biden.

And you wonder why no Democrat has ever been arrested on charges that Republicans have created out of thin air
 
The gestapo on the march.

"The FBI’s attempt to ban Twitter accounts at the request of Ukrainian intelligence is among the most overt requests for censorship revealed to date in the Twitter Files, a cache of leaked communications from the social media giant."


I see you’ve completely given up using real sources and gone directly to fake news for all of your posts.
 
The committee needs to release the document to the public ASAP after they look at it. There's no sense in keeping it from us. Wray covering for Biden needs to end.


Eleven hours before the House Oversight Committee would assemble to vote on holding FBI Director Wray in Contempt of Congress, the FBI agreed to permit members of the Oversight Committee to review an unclassified informant file that allegedly links President Joe Biden to a $5 million bribery scheme.

Wednesday evening, Comer canceled the 9 a.m. Thursday vote to hold Wray in contempt. In exchange, the FBI finally agreed to allow the members to review the document, a demand on which Comer insisted from nearly the beginning of the negotiations.



You know they have to go to the FBI to see the documents....like the FBI wanted all along, right?
 
The FBI doesn't get to disregard a congressional subpoena. When the DOJ ignores the congressional oversight committee we might as well be a Banana Republic.
 
I ask all kinds of questions, and then I’ll look for the answers from credible sources, not from the lying. Mega cult, billionaire owned media, which supports all of Trump’s lies and bullshit.
Like DailyKos and McSweeney's, amirite? :D

Yeah, that was a warning shot over the bow of the S.S. DragonCanuck
 
The gestapo on the march.

"The FBI’s attempt to ban Twitter accounts at the request of Ukrainian intelligence is among the most overt requests for censorship revealed to date in the Twitter Files, a cache of leaked communications from the social media giant."

I see you’ve completely given up using real sources and gone directly to fake news for all of your posts.

On this SEPARATE issue concerning the FBI alerting Twitter about the Ukrainian state security request to censor a long list of news sources on the U.S. internet supposedly providing Russian “disinformation,” in this case Twitter formally responded appropriately (under its old management) and there is no information provided here of Twitter “buckling” under FBI “pressure.”

The FBI was not acting like “the Gestapo” here. The Gestapo didn’t “ask.” (Here the FBI didn’t even go so far as asking.) If the FBI were like the Gestapo it could not have been politely responded to and dismissed as Twitter did, and Aaron Mate and RT would not still be available on our internet.

Not saying the FBI was right in even passing on this info, but it is hardly surprising they did so. Also, Mate is not a “fake news source” as Dragonlady says, but a Russian sympathetic “anti-imperialist” whose positions may be offensive to her (and sometimes to me) but are absolutely legitimately protected under the First Amendment. Russian state sources are a somewhat different matter, but also must be heard and allowed — Twitter was wise to simply label them as such.

We must understand that the Ukrainians have shut down all alternative information sources during their war emergency. We must absolutely not follow their example here. That would be like letting the tail wag the dog and the dog bite its master.

Here again is Aaron Mate’s Substack article. It shows the relevant correspondence. Note even it prominently admits …

“Twitter declined to censor journalists targeted by Ukraine”


 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top