Well, that's fair. So basically, you propose that in order to make up for Jews' en-masse relocation to Palestine, we relocate Palestinians en-masse somewhere else, and 60 years later after a lot of bloodshed we relocate whoever they displaced somewhere else, and keep it going like that on and on?
Because surely you're not suggesting that any country is going to gladly jump at the opportunity of giving up a piece of land and placing 5 million people there, right? If it was that easy, you would've expected the United States or Western Europe (better yet, clear out Bavaria and give make it a Jewish homeland, that would've been fair) to give Jews a homeland in their own territory instead of outsourcing the problem to "somebody else." I mean, after all, Americans already have 50 states!! Europeans have 30 of them! Why should they have so many states, right?!
That was always the plan
Hertzel said wrote in 1895
Jewish settlement in Israel and the resettlement of Arabs outside the country.
'we shall have to spirit away the penniless population across the border'
A liberal zionist said,
The colonization of Palestine has to go into two directions. Jewish settlement in Eretz Israel and the resettlement of arabs in areas outside the country.
The rocks of Judea, obstacles that need to be cleared on a difficult path
Our country from the meditarian to the Jordan river and it is only our country. No one else has a right to it.
This is our country exclusively and so either you shut up, if you are a Palestinian and you live in one of the little islands we will give you, by sufferance not by right, or...get out
Jeff Halper on the Zionist attitude to Palestinians
The Zionist Story « P U L S E
Last edited: