bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
Are you trying to say that FDR didn't spend enough money on the New Deal and he should have spent more as if we were at war?
No I am saying he spent far to fucking much.
Yet your argument seems to be that it took war time spending to end the depression and FDR didn't do that, he spent too little. So should FDR have spent more or spent less to end the depression? Or perhaps you are putting forth the proposition that presidents should not be involved in economic depressions?
The war didn't end the depression. All it did is allow FDR to send all the unemployed off to Europe to fight the Nazis.