Farewell Sweden.....

So why has the US spent billions in EU countries, IF NOT for their own winnings, Most NATO countriesare obliged to buyYankie crap……...not forgetting that the USA must have its snottu nose in everybodies affairs……...true Sweden did sell iron ore to Germany and also to Great Britain as well as selling ball bearings thru SKF……..the worlds biggest manufacturer of ball bearings THEN and NOW……..perhaps you hadforgotten that the USA was inbed with Hitler in the late 30s and right up until Dec 1941, when Hitler pulled the chain on the USA, all the big boys were there Prescott Bush and long long list of Hitler lovers, the USAs history of cowardice……….41% in a newspaper poll, your should have seen how they loaded the questions……...but that still leave 59%………...who did not vote YES, and Russia and Sweden are on very good speaking terms, stop reading the US made up drivel
Yeah yeah yeah. Sure. Do you know how much it costs to maintain a force of almost 180,000 battle ready troops, fighter planes, bombers, and missile system in the heart of Europe to protect it for over 70 years? Take a wild guess, knucklehead. The reason Europeans were able to rebuild and are so advanced is because the US provided peace, security, and stability for over 70 years at no charge, and Europeans didn't have to spend half their budgets on the military, national defense, and wars.

Is that contribution listed in your stupid list? LOL.

Wow you sure are blowing you American made trumpet.........so why does the USA have armed military in 182 sovereign countries across the World..........OH an by the way, Sweden is not one of the 182, we can look afterorselvesand have done so for 200 yrs with joining in any armed conflicts, but we are prepared to cleanup after the Dirty slimy deeds done by the USA and her ""allies""
Yeah Sweden can sure take care of itself. It will the the Russians two days to conquer them. If it's raining make it three and in case of snow make it four. Ha ha ha.

Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
 
Yeah yeah yeah. Sure. Do you know how much it costs to maintain a force of almost 180,000 battle ready troops, fighter planes, bombers, and missile system in the heart of Europe to protect it for over 70 years? Take a wild guess, knucklehead. The reason Europeans were able to rebuild and are so advanced is because the US provided peace, security, and stability for over 70 years at no charge, and Europeans didn't have to spend half their budgets on the military, national defense, and wars.

Is that contribution listed in your stupid list? LOL.

Wow you sure are blowing you American made trumpet.........so why does the USA have armed military in 182 sovereign countries across the World..........OH an by the way, Sweden is not one of the 182, we can look afterorselvesand have done so for 200 yrs with joining in any armed conflicts, but we are prepared to cleanup after the Dirty slimy deeds done by the USA and her ""allies""
Yeah Sweden can sure take care of itself. It will the the Russians two days to conquer them. If it's raining make it three and in case of snow make it four. Ha ha ha.

Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
.....

and ROUDY is a nickname for a fucking twat
 
Yeah yeah yeah. Sure. Do you know how much it costs to maintain a force of almost 180,000 battle ready troops, fighter planes, bombers, and missile system in the heart of Europe to protect it for over 70 years? Take a wild guess, knucklehead. The reason Europeans were able to rebuild and are so advanced is because the US provided peace, security, and stability for over 70 years at no charge, and Europeans didn't have to spend half their budgets on the military, national defense, and wars.

Is that contribution listed in your stupid list? LOL.

Wow you sure are blowing you American made trumpet.........so why does the USA have armed military in 182 sovereign countries across the World..........OH an by the way, Sweden is not one of the 182, we can look afterorselvesand have done so for 200 yrs with joining in any armed conflicts, but we are prepared to cleanup after the Dirty slimy deeds done by the USA and her ""allies""
Yeah Sweden can sure take care of itself. It will the the Russians two days to conquer them. If it's raining make it three and in case of snow make it four. Ha ha ha.

Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
Bina in both Arabic and Farsi have to do with sight or vision, Muslim invader freeloader in Sweden.

What does Bina (Muslim Arabic Name) mean?
 
I wonder where that Mooslem invader ran off to? Well to be fair it can also be a European Latin name, but they got it from the previous Arabic Islamic invasions into Europe.

http://www.wordsense.eu/bina/
 
Wow you sure are blowing you American made trumpet.........so why does the USA have armed military in 182 sovereign countries across the World..........OH an by the way, Sweden is not one of the 182, we can look afterorselvesand have done so for 200 yrs with joining in any armed conflicts, but we are prepared to cleanup after the Dirty slimy deeds done by the USA and her ""allies""
Yeah Sweden can sure take care of itself. It will the the Russians two days to conquer them. If it's raining make it three and in case of snow make it four. Ha ha ha.

Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
Bina in both Arabic and Farsi have to do with sight or vision, Muslim invader freeloader in Sweden.

What does Bina (Muslim Arabic Name) mean?
Its the name of my pet toad, but then I Think of you, so I have changed it to Donald
 
Yeah Sweden can sure take care of itself. It will the the Russians two days to conquer them. If it's raining make it three and in case of snow make it four. Ha ha ha.

Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
Bina in both Arabic and Farsi have to do with sight or vision, Muslim invader freeloader in Sweden.

What does Bina (Muslim Arabic Name) mean?
Its the name of my pet toad, but then I Think of you, so I have changed it to Donald
Pet toad? Is that your lover? Ha ha.
 
Piss off Little yankie jerk
And the dirty little secret here is that "Bina" isn't even a Swedish name. It's middle eastern and Muslim. You must be one of the invaders.
So what does binabina mean, cleaver dickhead
Bina in both Arabic and Farsi have to do with sight or vision, Muslim invader freeloader in Sweden.

What does Bina (Muslim Arabic Name) mean?
Its the name of my pet toad, but then I Think of you, so I have changed it to Donald
Pet toad? Is that your lover? Ha ha.
And what is your lover a big fat pig, like Drumpf........bet you would like to hump him, they say he pays well
 
Swedens-walk-of-shame-hi-red.jpg

GENEVA, Feb. 13, 2017 — In a statement that has gone viral on Twitter and Facebook, UN Watch, a non-governmental human rights NGO in Geneva, expressed disappointment that Sweden’s self-declared “first feminist government in the world”sacrificed its principles and betrayed the rights of Iranian women as Trade Minister Ann Linde and other female members walked before Iranian President Rouhani on Saturday wearing Hijabs, Chadors, and long coats, in deference to Iran’s oppressive and unjust modesty laws which make the Hijab compulsory — despite Stockholm’s promise to promote “a gender equality perspective” internationally, and to adopt a “feminist foreign policy” in which “equality between women and men is a fundamental aim.”

In doing so, Sweden’s female leaders ignored the recent appeal by Iranian women’s right activist Masih Alinejad who urgedEuropeans female politicians “to stand for their own dignity” and to refuse to kowtow to the compulsory Hijab while visiting Iran.
https://www.unwatch.org/walk-shame-swedens-first-feminist-government-don-hijabs-iran/
remember when they said more women in govt was the answer
 
The Globalist Elites want their New World Order. They've been working on it for at least a hundred years. Destroying individual nations' cultures and sovereignty, is their most important objective. Sweden will now suffer violent chaos. The Globalist Elites need chaos. Because out of chaos, comes their New World Order.
 

Anyone know who that old Fascist is? He makes no attempt to be open minded.


Pat Condell, he's a whack job who hates all religions, he's just ranting about Muslims at the moment, as opposed to Christians a few years ago and Jewish people a few years before that. Just go to You tube and type in Pat Condell, you'll find hundreds of his rants about one thing or another
 
Sweden's Fatuous Feminists
They're tigresses when confronting Trump, but meek in the face of real misogyny.
February 17, 2017
Bruce Bawer
njh.jpeg


So here's twenty-first-century Western feminism in a nutshell. Earlier this month, after the White House released a photograph of Donald Trump signing a presidential order in the presence of several male appointees, Isabella Lovin, the Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, put out a picture of herself signing a climate-change law in the company of other top female officials. Plainly, the photo was meant as a defiant statement of proud womanhood in the face of the world's leading threat to female equality and dignity – the new man in the Oval Office. Indeed, the current Swedish government, in which the cabinet consists of twelve men and twelve women, has proclaimed itself to be “the world's first feminist government.” Buzzfeed's article about this triumphant moment carried the headline: “Did The Swedish Government Just Epically Troll Donald Trump With This All-Woman Photo?”

But what a difference a couple of weeks can make. The other day a four-man, eleven-woman Swedish delegation traveled to Tehran to ink a trade deal with the mullahs. Throughout the visit, the women, led by Trade Minister Ann Linde, wore hijabs, plus long, shapeless coats obviously selected for maximum “modesty.” One photograph, which shows the female members of the Swedish delegation striding past Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, is wonderfully illuminating: in their postures, in their facial expressions, these women's defiance in response to big, bad, evil Trump is nowhere in evidence. They're all wearing dark pants. The woman whose face we can see the best is the very picture of meekness and obeisance. The look on her face might well be that of a humble, pious, provincial nun about to be introduced to the Pope. Her right hand is on her chest, a signal that Rouhani need not worry that she might try to shake his hand. Another picture shows Linde herself clearly bowing to an Iranian official. The “world's first feminist government,” which “epically troll[ed]” Trump, thus effectively communicated to Iran – and the entire Muslim world – a message of submission that could hardly have been improved upon. UN Watch quite rightly dubbed it a “walk of shame.”

In Sweden, of course, every properly brought up man or woman knows that it's virtuous to thumb your nose at the U.S. president and equally virtuous to bow and scrape to terrorism-supporting imams. But a picture says a thousand words, and the images of those female officials sporting hijabs in Iran proved to be too much even for a lot of otherwise hardy Swedish stomachs. The leader of the Liberal Party worried aloud that the pictures would empower “conservative forces in our suburbs” (in other words, religious Muslims). Linde offered the “excuse” that the hijabs worn by her delegation were actually designed in Sweden. Get it? While signing a trade deal, they were modeling Swedish products intended for use by docile females! As Norway's document.no website commented: “We see the contours of a new Swedish export success: Feminist government facilitates the export of hijabs to Iran.” (By the way, it turns out that when a female Norway official, Ingvil Smines Tybring-Gjedde, was scheduled to visit Iran in December and was told she'd have to wear a hijab, she refused – and canceled the trip.)

...

Of course, after all these years, it's clear to everyone that the lesson Muslim freeloaders are learning isn't that Swedes are virtuous but that they're world-class saps. It should also be obvious to Swedes that all too many of the people they're helping have nothing but the deepest contempt for their country, and that, unless all this nonsense is stopped (and put into reverse) very dramatically and very fast, they'll bring about its downfall.

But it's hard for a true believer to give up on a religion. And I'm not talking about Islam. I'm talking about that lethal faith known as Swedish do-gooderism.

Sweden's Fatuous Feminists
 
It's the law in Iran that women should cover their hair, it seems you are advocating that Swedish politicians and diplomats should break the laws of the country they are trying to do business with? Anyone in business (including Donald Trump) will tell you that sometimes you have to do what's necessary to finalise a deal. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "feminism".
 
It's the law in Iran that women should cover their hair, it seems you are advocating that Swedish politicians and diplomats should break the laws of the country they are trying to do business with? Anyone in business (including Donald Trump) will tell you that sometimes you have to do what's necessary to finalise a deal. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "feminism".
If they stood on principle they would have sent surrogates. Instead they're hypocrites.
 
Sweden's Fatuous Feminists
They're tigresses when confronting Trump, but meek in the face of real misogyny.
February 17, 2017
Bruce Bawer
njh.jpeg


So here's twenty-first-century Western feminism in a nutshell. Earlier this month, after the White House released a photograph of Donald Trump signing a presidential order in the presence of several male appointees, Isabella Lovin, the Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, put out a picture of herself signing a climate-change law in the company of other top female officials. Plainly, the photo was meant as a defiant statement of proud womanhood in the face of the world's leading threat to female equality and dignity – the new man in the Oval Office. Indeed, the current Swedish government, in which the cabinet consists of twelve men and twelve women, has proclaimed itself to be “the world's first feminist government.” Buzzfeed's article about this triumphant moment carried the headline: “Did The Swedish Government Just Epically Troll Donald Trump With This All-Woman Photo?”

But what a difference a couple of weeks can make. The other day a four-man, eleven-woman Swedish delegation traveled to Tehran to ink a trade deal with the mullahs. Throughout the visit, the women, led by Trade Minister Ann Linde, wore hijabs, plus long, shapeless coats obviously selected for maximum “modesty.” One photograph, which shows the female members of the Swedish delegation striding past Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, is wonderfully illuminating: in their postures, in their facial expressions, these women's defiance in response to big, bad, evil Trump is nowhere in evidence. They're all wearing dark pants. The woman whose face we can see the best is the very picture of meekness and obeisance. The look on her face might well be that of a humble, pious, provincial nun about to be introduced to the Pope. Her right hand is on her chest, a signal that Rouhani need not worry that she might try to shake his hand. Another picture shows Linde herself clearly bowing to an Iranian official. The “world's first feminist government,” which “epically troll[ed]” Trump, thus effectively communicated to Iran – and the entire Muslim world – a message of submission that could hardly have been improved upon. UN Watch quite rightly dubbed it a “walk of shame.”

In Sweden, of course, every properly brought up man or woman knows that it's virtuous to thumb your nose at the U.S. president and equally virtuous to bow and scrape to terrorism-supporting imams. But a picture says a thousand words, and the images of those female officials sporting hijabs in Iran proved to be too much even for a lot of otherwise hardy Swedish stomachs. The leader of the Liberal Party worried aloud that the pictures would empower “conservative forces in our suburbs” (in other words, religious Muslims). Linde offered the “excuse” that the hijabs worn by her delegation were actually designed in Sweden. Get it? While signing a trade deal, they were modeling Swedish products intended for use by docile females! As Norway's document.no website commented: “We see the contours of a new Swedish export success: Feminist government facilitates the export of hijabs to Iran.” (By the way, it turns out that when a female Norway official, Ingvil Smines Tybring-Gjedde, was scheduled to visit Iran in December and was told she'd have to wear a hijab, she refused – and canceled the trip.)

...

Of course, after all these years, it's clear to everyone that the lesson Muslim freeloaders are learning isn't that Swedes are virtuous but that they're world-class saps. It should also be obvious to Swedes that all too many of the people they're helping have nothing but the deepest contempt for their country, and that, unless all this nonsense is stopped (and put into reverse) very dramatically and very fast, they'll bring about its downfall.

But it's hard for a true believer to give up on a religion. And I'm not talking about Islam. I'm talking about that lethal faith known as Swedish do-gooderism.

Sweden's Fatuous Feminists

Leftist Globalists are a weak confused bunch. They don't do what's right, they instead do what they feel is Politically Correct. It's very rare to see a Leftist Woman criticizing the Muslim World for its awful treatment of women. In other words, it's fashionable and PC to criticize a Donald Trump, but it's very difficult and not so PC to criticize Muslim treatment of women. Like i said, they're weak and confused.
 
It's the law in Iran that women should cover their hair, it seems you are advocating that Swedish politicians and diplomats should break the laws of the country they are trying to do business with? Anyone in business (including Donald Trump) will tell you that sometimes you have to do what's necessary to finalise a deal. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "feminism".
If they stood on principle they would have sent surrogates. Instead they're hypocrites.

They can't. They're cuckold Leftists. They won't stand up to awful Muslim treatment of women. They're weak and confused. It's much easier and PC for them to attack a Donald Trump. Cuckold Leftists have very little credibility.
 

Forum List

Back
Top