Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's a nice fairytale...sold by corp mouthpieces like you..........but f35 nowhere close to F22 in that regard...ergo you will be seen.....why do you think there is such a rush for high end fighters by US, Japan and others lately.....methinks the truth is ugly in regard to the slowboat you try so hard to sellFunny how Japan will probably only put them on their helo carriers and alrdy are working on a true fighter.......Slow and low...still equals dead in todays fighter combat arena......
ICU before UCMe means you are dead no matter how low and slow or high and fast you are.
Not chanting anything......all linked buddy......you believe in magic ,,,f35 always gets first shot and rides away into the sunset,,,,,,,no allowance for tactics or advances by our enemy....by the time this thing gets combat qualled its alrdy garbage......nice expensive targetsIt's incredible how you are still chanting this despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary during exercises and from pilots themselves. I mean, I get it that you were clueless a few years ago when this plane was still brand new, but to stubbornly stick to your same song and dance when it keeps on dominating other aircraft takes an impressive amount of self-delusion.Funny how Japan will probably only put them on their helo carriers and alrdy are working on a true fighter.......Slow and low...still equals dead in todays fighter combat arena......
You live in a bizarro world of oppossing fighters taking no drag/range/speed penalty for the ordance, fuel tanks, and targeting pods they carry and being able to find stealth fighters that you have hilariously claimed aren't even stealthy.
The inaccuracy of that article is almost funny, I'm curious if ManontheStreet even read it before posting it.I read the article and found too many mistakes in it. For instance, the F-35 doesn't have the capability of using the same Long Ranged Missiles that the F-22 can. Horse Feathers. It carries 4 of them internally. It carries the most recent Amraam. And can now carry the Aim-9X on short wing pylons. It probably won't carry the Aim-9X too often since it does take away some performance and stealth but it can do it. Your whole article is written by some moron that is using information from 2014 as a source. Or even earlier.
No you chant... you have a long history of doing fly-by posts to continue your weird anti-F-35 obsession yet NEVER sticking around to defend the flaws in your reasoning or the blogs you post. All you do is regurgitate and run, the most you ever manage to put together as a defense of your opinion is vague references to how you've answered that before years ago somewhere else in this thread, which we all know isn't true.Not chanting anything......all linked buddy......you believe in magic ,,,f35 always gets first shot and rides away into the sunset,,,,,,,no allowance for tactics or advances by our enemy....by the time this thing gets combat qualled its alrdy garbage......nice expensive targets
To believe this you must also believe that pilots from USAF, USMC, Norway, Japan, Israel, etc. are all lying, the thousands of people who participate in Red Flag are lying, and your blog authors who have never stepped foot in a modern fighter jet are gospel.no allowance for tactics or advances by our enemy
That's a nice fairytale...sold by corp mouthpieces like you..........but f35 nowhere close to F22 in that regard...ergo you will be seen.....why do you think there is such a rush for high end fighters by US, Japan and others lately.....methinks the truth is ugly in regard to the slowboat you try so hard to sellFunny how Japan will probably only put them on their helo carriers and alrdy are working on a true fighter.......Slow and low...still equals dead in todays fighter combat arena......
ICU before UCMe means you are dead no matter how low and slow or high and fast you are.
So they say.....and we have no idea what the scenarios wereThat's a nice fairytale...sold by corp mouthpieces like you..........but f35 nowhere close to F22 in that regard...ergo you will be seen.....why do you think there is such a rush for high end fighters by US, Japan and others lately.....methinks the truth is ugly in regard to the slowboat you try so hard to sellFunny how Japan will probably only put them on their helo carriers and alrdy are working on a true fighter.......Slow and low...still equals dead in todays fighter combat arena......
ICU before UCMe means you are dead no matter how low and slow or high and fast you are.
15 to 1 record. Not a bad record. Meanwhile, against the same ground installation, the A-10, F-16 and F-18 got slaughtered. Why? Because they are hard to see and hard to attack. Strealth is not invisible. It just makes it hard to see it. And the F-35 is hard to see. And it fires on the ground and air assets before it can be seen. Simple as that.
Boy that was hard to call wasn't it?Amazing how quick you 2 appear after months of a latent thread to spread your HS
Yep all those pilots, support staff, and analysts running the exercise for years are either lying or don't know what they're doing when they set up exercises to challenge aircraft.So they say.....and we have no idea what the scenarios were
An interesting (and feeble) way to maintain your crickets personae. Manonthestreet, the poster who can spam links but lacks the intellectual depth to actually discuss or defend any points brought forward. He doesn't read the posts, yet he quotes them to respond. Clearly you read them, but know you cannot support your bullshit regurgitations so you ignore everything inconvenient to your child like view of the world.I never read any of your posts.....tired of your you know more than anybody in the world routine.....all those linked stories,,,,,just all idiots......LLMMMAAOOO
That "article" is so funny in that every time you look another glaringly asinine mistake pops up.Why the F-35 Isn’t Good Enough for Japan
Tokyo looks to American and indigenous alternatives as a result of the joint strike fighter’s shortcomings.
Official combat debut, only six months after Israel declared IOC.
The F-35 just made its combat debut
Lockheed Martin’s F-35 has seen combat for the first time. The Israel Defense Forces announced on its Twitter account that the Israeli version of the aircraft, using its “Adir” moniker was used in operational missions. “The Adir planes are already operational and flying in operational missions,” the tweet said, quoting Israel Air Force head Maj. Gen. Amikam Norkin. “We are the first in the world to use the F-35 in operational activity.” The Israeli Air Force used the F-35 in two recent strikes in Syria, Norkin said, according to the news outlet Haaretz.
The fifth-generation fighter jet has been lauded as a “game-changer” by the Israeli military, not only for its offensive and stealth capabilities, but for its ability to connect its systems with other aircraft and form an information-sharing network.
WASHINGTON (Tribune News Service) — The Navy’s newest fighter jet, the stealthy F-35C, may not have the range it needs to strike enemy targets, the House Armed Services Committee said in a new report, raising troubling questions about whether the multibillion-dollar program is already outpaced by threats.
And critics say the Navy fighter — part of the Joint Strike Fighter initiative, the most expensive weapons program in history — may actually have been out of date years ago.
Navy’s top-dollar stealth fighter may not go the distance
Attack craft are never coming back.....Navy chose poorly. F14 Super could have been used as every bit as effective attack as F18....with much longer legs.....
No you couldn't,,,,dont lie......Navy cant count on Airforce......even if they brought attack craft back they have to be escorted and again your range limitation ends your F35 mission short.......how does it feel to have been a useful idiotAttack craft are never coming back.....Navy chose poorly. F14 Super could have been used as every bit as effective attack as F18....with much longer legs.....
Agreed. But they cut the procurement funds. You could buy 3 F-18s for what one F-14D cost. There just wansn't enough money to have both or enough F-14Ds to do the job. And the F-14 is a really big bird. Where you could park one F-14, you can park 2 F-18s. On a carrier, space is a premium. While I disagree with their decision, I can understand their logic at the time. Today, that logic is biting us in the ass. The A-12 was supposed to fill that role. But even the A-12 only had an 800 mile range which would not have been enough. Any fighter would have to have an excess of 1000 mile radius to counter the antiship weapons of the Russian and Chinese today. Pretty much, the Navy is going to have to be dependent on the Air Force in stopping these threats.
