Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
That's ridiculous. You guys believe any old bullshit. Every right wing talking point becomes more and more outlandish.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
That's ridiculous. You guys believe any old bullshit. Every right wing talking point becomes more and more outlandish.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
That's ridiculous. You guys believe any old bullshit. Every right wing talking point becomes more and more outlandish.
If the EPA is effective and competent, how did the oil spill happen?
We depend on the EPA to enforce our environmental laws. Without the EPA, we just as well repeal our the laws which seems to be part of the right's vision of America.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
That's ridiculous. You guys believe any old bullshit. Every right wing talking point becomes more and more outlandish.
We depend on the EPA to enforce our environmental laws. Without the EPA, we just as well repeal our the laws which seems to be part of the right's vision of America.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
It was Nixon who created the EPA by executive order combining a number of branches of other agencies in order to reduce cost an improve effectiveness. Without the EPA, enforcement would fall back to a number of agencies increasing cost and reducing effectiveness.
We depend on the EPA to enforce our environmental laws. Without the EPA, we just as well repeal our the laws which seems to be part of the right's vision of America.Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
It was Nixon who created the EPA by executive order combining a number of branches of other agencies in order to reduce cost an improve effectiveness. Without the EPA, enforcement would fall back to a number of agencies increasing cost and reducing effectiveness.
Excuse me? Last time I heard there were individual State EPA's that are quite capable (more so in some cases) of protecting the environment and punishing businesses that fail to maintain and protect their local environment.
Did those all just vanish in your world? What world DO you live on anyway? Get with the program here buddy. The States are quite capable and don't need yet another incompetent and inefficient bureaucracy screwing up what they do best....which is protect their States. Bet you didn't know that the Federal EPA has many conflicting rules and regs that make it nearly impossible to know what their intent was.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
No, all states do not have an EPA. Most states have a several agencies with responsibility of enforcing state environmental laws. State agencies rely heavily on the EPA for support. In fact, many of these state agencies would virtually disappear without EPA funding.We depend on the EPA to enforce our environmental laws. Without the EPA, we just as well repeal our the laws which seems to be part of the right's vision of America.Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
It was Nixon who created the EPA by executive order combining a number of branches of other agencies in order to reduce cost an improve effectiveness. Without the EPA, enforcement would fall back to a number of agencies increasing cost and reducing effectiveness.
Excuse me? Last time I heard there were individual State EPA's that are quite capable (more so in some cases) of protecting the environment and punishing businesses that fail to maintain and protect their local environment.
Did those all just vanish in your world? What world DO you live on anyway? Get with the program here buddy. The States are quite capable and don't need yet another incompetent and inefficient bureaucracy screwing up what they do best....which is protect their States. Bet you didn't know that the Federal EPA has many conflicting rules and regs that make it nearly impossible to know what their intent was.
Yes, when the EPA is mainly interested in politics and not protecting the environment it is time for it to go. They have done some good things but lately they are an arm of a political organization and ignoring their own scientists reports on subjects they wish to control. Hence, they have to go.
You are rediculous. Post me a link of the EPA playing politics. You frigin Republicans come up with the strangest suff.
No, all states do not have an EPA. Most states have a several agencies with responsibility of enforcing state environmental laws. State agencies rely heavily on the EPA for support. In fact, many of these state agencies would virtually disappear without EPA funding.We depend on the EPA to enforce our environmental laws. Without the EPA, we just as well repeal our the laws which seems to be part of the right's vision of America.
It was Nixon who created the EPA by executive order combining a number of branches of other agencies in order to reduce cost an improve effectiveness. Without the EPA, enforcement would fall back to a number of agencies increasing cost and reducing effectiveness.
Excuse me? Last time I heard there were individual State EPA's that are quite capable (more so in some cases) of protecting the environment and punishing businesses that fail to maintain and protect their local environment.
Did those all just vanish in your world? What world DO you live on anyway? Get with the program here buddy. The States are quite capable and don't need yet another incompetent and inefficient bureaucracy screwing up what they do best....which is protect their States. Bet you didn't know that the Federal EPA has many conflicting rules and regs that make it nearly impossible to know what their intent was.
Our rivers, air, and wildlife are not restricted to state boundaries. Pollution in one state affects other states. Migrating wildlife knows nothing of state lines. Environmental protection is an interstate issue and thus requires federal laws.
Wish we could get an idea of what Obama thinks, but he wont say, and did not want to vote on it before he was president.
06/10/2008 Increasing Taxes on Profits, Rescinding Certain Tax Deductions, and Increasing Tax Incentives for Alternative Energy Programs for Oil Companies
S 3044 NV Cloture Not Invoked - Senate
(51 - 43)
Project Vote Smart - President Barack H. Obama, Jr. - Voting Record
That's ridiculous. You guys believe any old bullshit. Every right wing talking point becomes more and more outlandish.
If the EPA is effective and competent, how did the oil spill happen?
Since the pipeline is buried under the river and flooding is occurring it may very well have been caused by scouring of the river bed and exposing the pipeline either to debris or causing sediment under the pipeline to be removed and causing the pipeline to crumple or bend and causing cracks. A lot of oil was released suddenly which indicates a catastrophic failure which means a large hole had to appear quite suddenly. All of this speculation though and until the pipeline can be checked out the cause is unknown.