Let me start with a good one from the Divine Sarah. The intellect behind this face said:
The intellect behind this face wants the US military to bomb Syria:
Jim Treacher over at the Daily Caller summed it up nicely:
Next
I’m as skeptical as Garth Kant over who done it in Syria. The Administration is blaming Bashar Assad but:
One of the key proofs the administration offers against Assad’s military is where the chemical weapons were launched from and where they landed:
Until proven otherwise, the rebels could just as easily have fired them from Assad-held territory. They’d be fools to launch them from their own territory.
Where did the rebels get chemical weapons? It does not take much imagination to answer that one assuming the dead shown in the video clips flooding the news were gassed. Barack Taqiyya & Company have been lying about everything for five years; so it’s going to take a boatload of solid evidence to prove they aren’t lying about who did it in Syria.
Even if real proof is forthcoming America should not take sides in a civil war. The time to act is after the winning side proves to be a military threat to this country.
And what ever happened to exit strategy? There was a time when Democrats insisted that an exit strategy was the primary component in sending the US military to foreign countries. Question: Where’s the exit strategy in Syria? Indeed, where is the exit strategy in Egypt, Libya, and so on? Of course, no military exit strategy is needed when there are no boots on the ground. The question should be: Where is the political exit strategy after the bombing stops? The Balkans tell us that the touchy-feely crowd never have a political exit strategy. In fact, after the bombing stopped in the Balkans US troops were sent to Bosnia:
To be fair to Clinton he had a strategy —— only it was an enter strategy. Those boots on the ground are still there contrary to Clinton telling the public the troops would be home by Christmas.
Bottom line on all of it: American Socialists/Communists are moving the US military towards responding to philosophical threats and away from defending the country. Their strategy was formulated in the Vietnam War era. Basically, UN-loving traitors like John Kerry said if Communist countries are not a military threat Communism cannot be a philosophical threat; ergo, we decide what constitutes a threat.
"So we’re bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I’m the idiot?” So, said Sarah Palin Friday evening.
Sarah Palin mocks Obama for his Syria bumbling
By Andrew Malcolm
Posted 08/30/2013 09:04 PM ET
Sarah Palin mocks Obama for his Syria bumbling - Investors.com
The intellect behind this face wants the US military to bomb Syria:
Jim Treacher over at the Daily Caller summed it up nicely:
We have to bomb Syria to find out what’s in it.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/30/pelosi-we-have-to-bomb-syria-to-find-out-wha
Next
I’m as skeptical as Garth Kant over who done it in Syria. The Administration is blaming Bashar Assad but:
. . . Kerry did not provide any actual evidence backing up those assertions.
XXXXX
. . . the document the State Department released does not show any actual evidence to support the administration’s accusation that Syria launched a chemical attack on its own people on Aug. 21.
One of the key proofs the administration offers against Assad’s military is where the chemical weapons were launched from and where they landed:
“We know rockets came only from regime-controlled areas, and went only to opposition-controlled or contested neighborhoods,” he added in a news conference from the State Department Friday, while making the administration’s case for a possible military strike on Syria.
Kerry: Assad is the gasser but 'proof' not revealed
Says U.S. credibility, interests on line
Published: 18 hours ago
GARTH KANT
Kerry: Assad is the gasser but ?proof? not revealed
Until proven otherwise, the rebels could just as easily have fired them from Assad-held territory. They’d be fools to launch them from their own territory.
Where did the rebels get chemical weapons? It does not take much imagination to answer that one assuming the dead shown in the video clips flooding the news were gassed. Barack Taqiyya & Company have been lying about everything for five years; so it’s going to take a boatload of solid evidence to prove they aren’t lying about who did it in Syria.
Even if real proof is forthcoming America should not take sides in a civil war. The time to act is after the winning side proves to be a military threat to this country.
And what ever happened to exit strategy? There was a time when Democrats insisted that an exit strategy was the primary component in sending the US military to foreign countries. Question: Where’s the exit strategy in Syria? Indeed, where is the exit strategy in Egypt, Libya, and so on? Of course, no military exit strategy is needed when there are no boots on the ground. The question should be: Where is the political exit strategy after the bombing stops? The Balkans tell us that the touchy-feely crowd never have a political exit strategy. In fact, after the bombing stopped in the Balkans US troops were sent to Bosnia:
Clinton Will Keep Troops in Bosnia
By John F. Harris
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 19, 1997; Page A01
washingtonpost.com: Clinton Will Keep Troops in Bosnia
To be fair to Clinton he had a strategy —— only it was an enter strategy. Those boots on the ground are still there contrary to Clinton telling the public the troops would be home by Christmas.
Bottom line on all of it: American Socialists/Communists are moving the US military towards responding to philosophical threats and away from defending the country. Their strategy was formulated in the Vietnam War era. Basically, UN-loving traitors like John Kerry said if Communist countries are not a military threat Communism cannot be a philosophical threat; ergo, we decide what constitutes a threat.
Last edited: