What sentences do you propose for cops in cases of illegally obtained evidence? Also, won't that put prosecutors in a major conflict of interest? Wouldn't they just tell the officer to go ahead and obtain evidence illegally and then just plea bargain the case away for a slap on the wrist?
You aren't operating in reality. The exclusionary rule is absolutely necessary to protect society from corrupt cops who think they are above the law. How can you possibly justify a conviction of lawbreaking based on evidence gathered by cops who were breaking the law?
acludem
You aren't operating in reality. The exclusionary rule is absolutely necessary to protect society from corrupt cops who think they are above the law. How can you possibly justify a conviction of lawbreaking based on evidence gathered by cops who were breaking the law?
acludem