Ex-Pfizer Top Scientist Files Crimes Against Humanity Charges in Hague, Against Bill Gates, Boris Johnson, Klaus Schwab, Fauci..

Are we bond by the ICC? No, we do not have to listen legally. Should we? Hell yes, in this case.
  • Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression
  • The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum
  • According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute
  • The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects
  • The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court
 
Crimes against humanity are easy peasy when you have the Democrat Party behind you.
 
Since it is all a propaganda piece, no, they will not be charged.
None of you are talking about the actual content of the ICC, so we know that you don't know what you're talking about. There's clearly more to it than propaganda for we who are more educated in the topic.
 
I mean the whole thing, it's a lie. Give me this story not on some alt-right conspiracy site, and then I'll believe you.

Seems pretty obvious to me.
They are making over $30 billion each on fake mRNA vaccines that Australia proves do not work, since they have a 93% vax rate, with no effect.
Combine that with the covid coming out of Wuhan lab that deliberately enhanced gain of function, and was paid for by these defendants, is seems pretty open and shut.
 
What is alt right about the violations of the code? Does a crime have to be reported by a source you like to be real?


No one is talking about the code here, we are talking about your bullshit article. The place you got the article from is shit.


The ICC has acknowledged that it has received a complaint, but hasn't assessed its merit yet. Don't you think, that if it had any truth to it, that it would be reviewed immediately? These people have been the boogeyman for simpletons who buy into anything they see on a non-mainstream website.
 
Seems pretty obvious to me.
They are making over $30 billion each on fake mRNA vaccines that Australia proves do not work, since they have a 93% vax rate, with no effect.
Combine that with the covid coming out of Wuhan lab that deliberately enhanced gain of function, and was paid for by these defendants, is seems pretty open and shut.


That's not what the OP is talking about here. Fauci MAY get in trouble for his gain of function stuff, but the rest of it? Impossible to prove that they were intentionally made to not work.
 
Yes, it is, this is laughable insanity from a crazy idiot trying to get himself some attention.

Yes, that goes for your post, too.

What part?
Isn't it true Wuhan was paid to enhance gain of function?
Isn't it true these companies are making billions of mRNA injections that do not work?
Isn't it true we could prevented 95% of the deaths if we had ended the epidemic as quickly as possible, instead of "flattening the cure"?
 
No one is talking about the code here, we are talking about your bullshit article. The place you got the article from is shit.


The ICC has acknowledged that it has received a complaint, but hasn't assessed its merit yet. Don't you think, that if it had any truth to it, that it would be reviewed immediately? These people have been the boogeyman for simpletons who buy into anything they see on a non-mainstream website.
:banghead:
 
No one is talking about the code here, we are talking about your bullshit article. The place you got the article from is shit.


The ICC has acknowledged that it has received a complaint, but hasn't assessed its merit yet. Don't you think, that if it had any truth to it, that it would be reviewed immediately? These people have been the boogeyman for simpletons who buy into anything they see on a non-mainstream website.

No, I would assume the ICC would keep it low key until it had some verified data of its own, so that it did not get sued.
 

Forum List

Back
Top