danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #121
They would have abolished, it eventually, in a more rational manner; and, we would have simply been, "the Posterity" on that one.It worked for the Romans; why reinvent an inferior wheel.Our Second Amendment declares, well regulated militia are the answer. That is why.The unorganized militia is the problem. Wellness of regulation is the solution. Lowering our tax burden should be a result.
Thanks for letting us know, the right wing doesn't really care.
How is hiring more people going to lower the tax burden?
How can you claim using convicts as amateur cops is a solution?
How is using a volunteer militia to build roads and aqueducts going to be good for our nation? They are amateurs at it.
You want to pretend you care, and that is fine. But all you really care about is continuing this insane argument about the 2nd amendment. You don't care about a citizen's ability to defend himself against a criminal. You don't care about the economy. YOu don't care about having an effective law enforcement. You care about your argument, and that is it.
Bullshit. What the 2nd amendment says about the militia is this: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...".
What is does not say is that militia is necessary for the infrastructure to be built. There is no way that the founding fathers wanted the militia made up of convicted felons and acting as amateur cops.
And you didn't answer the question about how hiring more people lowers the tax burden.
So did slavery. How about adding that in while we are mimicing the Romans?