EPA To Dismantle Rule That Protects Drinking Water For 117 Million

[Reasonable]

Donald Trump's destruction of America continues.

The Clean Water Rule was introduced in 2015 to update a longstanding act passed during the advent of the EPA to clean up heavily polluted federal waterways ― one of which was so fouled with sewage, it burst into flames in the late 1960s.

The Environmental Protection Agency is set to undo yet another Obama-era environmental regulation after releasing a proposal on Tuesday meant to dismantle a rule protecting rivers and streams from pollution.

EPA To Dismantle Rule That Protects Drinking Water For 117 Million | HuffPost

 

[Reasonable]

Only sissies care about clean drinking water, right?

 

[TNHarley]

maybe because its arguably unconstitutional? But im sure you dont care about that. ANYTHING to bash trump over. Like yesterday how you acted like private-public partnerships are a new thing even though the 2 biggest left leaning states in the country LOVE it.
Dumbfuck

 

[martybegan]

Donald Trump's destruction of America continues.

The Clean Water Rule was introduced in 2015 to update a longstanding act passed during the advent of the EPA to clean up heavily polluted federal waterways ― one of which was so fouled with sewage, it burst into flames in the late 1960s.

The Environmental Protection Agency is set to undo yet another Obama-era environmental regulation after releasing a proposal on Tuesday meant to dismantle a rule protecting rivers and streams from pollution.

EPA To Dismantle Rule That Protects Drinking Water For 117 Million | HuffPost

So you mean there will be no rules at all protecting drinking water?

 

[martybegan]

Only sissies care about clean drinking water, right?

So that means drinking water is completely unregulated at the federal level? At the State level as well?

 

[Iceweasel]

Only sissies care about clean drinking water, right?

Right. We are all going to be poisoned so the evil ones can carry out their diabolical master plan.

 

[TNHarley]

Only sissies care about clean drinking water, right?

So that means drinking water is completely unregulated at the federal level? At the State level as well?

I bet this poor sap was upset about giving bear protection power back to the state of alaska as well.
Let the children enjoy their imaginations while they can.

 

[whitehall]

Does the EPA get to expand federal authority on it's own or was it another lame Obama edict? How many people drink out of "navigable waters"?

 

[Reasonable]

“We are taking significant action to return power to the states and provide regulatory certainty to our nation’s farmers and businesses,”

Yeah, the "regulatory certainty" that no matter how much you poison people, we (the EPA) will look then other way. "Return power to the states" just means that states can fight it out on their own when one poisons the drinking water for another state down stream. "Not our problem" according to Pruitt.

 

[jc456]

Donald Trump's destruction of America continues.

The Clean Water Rule was introduced in 2015 to update a longstanding act passed during the advent of the EPA to clean up heavily polluted federal waterways ― one of which was so fouled with sewage, it burst into flames in the late 1960s.

The Environmental Protection Agency is set to undo yet another Obama-era environmental regulation after releasing a proposal on Tuesday meant to dismantle a rule protecting rivers and streams from pollution.

EPA To Dismantle Rule That Protects Drinking Water For 117 Million | HuffPost

so it took from 1960 to 2015 to pass that rule? what the fk? why did it take obummer seven years?

 

[jc456]

“We are taking significant action to return power to the states and provide regulatory certainty to our nation’s farmers and businesses,”

Yeah, the "regulatory certainty" that no matter how much you poison people, we (the EPA) will look then other way. "Return power to the states" just means that states can fight it out on their own when one poisons the drinking water for another state down stream. "Not our problem" according to Pruitt.

so it took from 1960 to 2015 to pass that rule? what the fk? why did it take obummer seven years?

 

[Reasonable]

maybe because its arguably unconstitutional? But im sure you dont care about that. ANYTHING to bash trump over. Like yesterday how you acted like private-public partnerships are a new thing even though the 2 biggest left leaning states in the country LOVE it.
Dumbfuck

It's hilarious when a nitwit like you mentions the word " unconstitutional " but you don't give two shits about Trump violating the emolument clause of the constitution to further enrich himself.

 

[Reasonable]

The Natural Resources Defense Council on Tuesday lambasted the move, calling it a “big mistake.”Rhea Suh, the environmental nonprofit’s president, declared the Trump administration’s action a “reckless attack on our waters and health” and vowed to stand up to the president.

“This proposal strikes directly at public health,” Suh said in a statement. “It would strip out needed protections for the streams that feed drinking water sources for one in every three Americans. Clean water is too important for that. We’ll stand up to this reckless attack on our waters and health.”

 

[jc456]

maybe because its arguably unconstitutional? But im sure you dont care about that. ANYTHING to bash trump over. Like yesterday how you acted like private-public partnerships are a new thing even though the 2 biggest left leaning states in the country LOVE it.
Dumbfuck

It's hilarious when a nitwit like you mentions the word " unconstitutional " but you don't give two shits about Trump violating the emolument clause of the constitution to further enrich himself.

look up emolument clause and tell us who is exempt from it? jeopardy music

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

You only care about clean drinking water when a Republican is President and did not write a damn thing when the EPA under Obama failed to warn New Mexico about the toxic sludge coming down river.

Wastewater from Colorado Mine Reaches New Mexico

 

[Reasonable]

Unless I'm mistaken I think repeal of tbe rule will also save lots of money for golf course owners like Trump. Surprise, surprise.

 

[TNHarley]

maybe because its arguably unconstitutional? But im sure you dont care about that. ANYTHING to bash trump over. Like yesterday how you acted like private-public partnerships are a new thing even though the 2 biggest left leaning states in the country LOVE it.
Dumbfuck

It's hilarious when a nitwit like you mentions the word " unconstitutional " but you don't give two shits about Trump violating the emolument clause of the constitution to further enrich himself.

Elaborate and we will go fro there. If he is, he deserves punishment.
Go

 

[jc456]

The Natural Resources Defense Council on Tuesday lambasted the move, calling it a “big mistake.”Rhea Suh, the environmental nonprofit’s president, declared the Trump administration’s action a “reckless attack on our waters and health” and vowed to stand up to the president.

“This proposal strikes directly at public health,” Suh said in a statement. “It would strip out needed protections for the streams that feed drinking water sources for one in every three Americans. Clean water is too important for that. We’ll stand up to this reckless attack on our waters and health.”

of course they did. it's what libs do, spew all kinds of useless nonsense to try and get their way on something. it's all baseless and tasteless.

 

[Reasonable]

You only care about clean drinking water when a Republican is President and did not write a damn thing when the EPA under Obama failed to warn New Mexico about the toxic sludge coming down river.

Wastewater from Colorado Mine Reaches New Mexico

Can't address the current attack on our waterways. Can't criticize Trump so you must deflect.
Typical deplorable tactic.

 

[martybegan]

“We are taking significant action to return power to the states and provide regulatory certainty to our nation’s farmers and businesses,”

Yeah, the "regulatory certainty" that no matter how much you poison people, we (the EPA) will look then other way. "Return power to the states" just means that states can fight it out on their own when one poisons the drinking water for another state down stream. "Not our problem" according to Pruitt.

Well if the EPA didn't keep trying to expand its power via fiat maybe people would trust it more.

When you try to expand the definition of navigable water to include drainage ditches, requiring millions of more people to get complicated and really unnecessary permits at their own cost, why are you wondering people would be pissed?