Environmentalists Using "Greenmail"

Discussion in 'Environment' started by PoliticalChic, Jan 14, 2013.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,763
    Thanks Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +24,936
    1. Those nasty, atavistic right-wingers!
    Those darn conservatives!
    And, of course, Republicans!
    All of ‘em: standing in the way of altruistic, forward-looking, caring-for-the-earth (and, of course, the children), the good guys: environmentalists…you know, Obama voters.

    Ya' think?
    Are you sure…..?
    Read on.....



    2. “Besides the fact that federal grants and loans are distorting the market for renewable energy, we now have another reason to be concerned about the proposed solar and wind projects for the desert: Union groups are attempting to block projects unless they get hiring agreements with the developers.

    3. Observers are calling it “greenmail,” as these groups are using the lengthy, complicated environmental regulations that already make any sort of development difficult in order to challenge the approval of energy projects, but apparently only the projects that don’t have labor agreements.

    a. “Greenmail”—a spin on the term “blackmail” under environmental law—is one aspect of this top-down format that achieves union organizing objectives by persuading employers, rather than employees, to recognize a union as its employees’ exclusive representative.”
    http://www.winston.com/siteFiles/Publications/Greenmail.pdf




    4. … a challenge by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Unions to stop the approval of a solar project in Kramer Junction. Their representatives claimed their concerns were about water use for the project, a claim that nobody with half a brain believes.

    a. “…construction unions use CEQA to block permits for projects until the developers agree to force their contractors to sign project labor agreements (PLAs)…” California

    5. Brightsource, the company developing the massive Ivanpah solar project near the border to Nevada, did not face such environmental challenges. Coincidentally, they signed agreement with labor groups for the construction jobs, jobs that will actually be paid for with a $1.37 billion in guaranteed federal loans.

    6. …not only have the jobs already been promised non-competitively to a small group within a larger pool of potentially qualified candidates, we all get to pay for it.

    7. … these tactics are not new and not confined to energy projects. Walmart has to deal with environmental challenges to pretty much every single project they attempt to build….pointless environmental challenge…

    8. The irony that the people hurt most by these labor actions are other laborers is lost on these folks. They don’t grasp that if their actions keep causing projects to be canceled or delayed, this ultimately reduces demand for construction workers,…” 'Greenmail' a threat to energy projects | projects, energy, calling - Desert Dispatch





    9. ‘Three California unions criticize CURE for challenging construction projects on environmental grounds, then dropping objections after CURE's affiliate wins contracts to supply workers. CURE says it aims to protect people and the environment.

    10. ‘State Energy Commissioner Jeffrey Byron said …"It does strain credibility when you have an organization called CURE that is concerned with the desert tortoise and wildlife habitat and turns around and disappears when a project labor agreement is signed.” ‘Labor coalition's tactics on renewable energy projects are criticized - Los Angeles Times




    So….what have we learned?

    The 'environmental movement' can best be represented as a matryoshka doll, a Russian nesting/nested doll, refers to a set of wooden dolls of decreasing size placed one inside the other.

    But, rather than dolls....they are a series of SCAMS.

    Yup....convince simpletons that 'it's to save the planet (all hail mother-Gaia!)' you can tell people what bulbs and toilets they can have, take their lands, demand feather-bed union contracts, huge academic study grants....heck, the sky's the limit!

    And who are the 'bad guys'? Why traditional Americans who believe in individualism over the collective, and property rights over confiscation.….it is often the ‘environmentalists’ of one stripe or another who pretend pristine motives, but are merely using the simps that the environmentalism has fooled.


    ‘Save the earth’ is no different than convincing folks there's a Santa Clause….in reality, folks just want 'presents'.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,471
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,315
    Oh the shame of it all. Unions using the same tactics as corperations. What a terrible, terrible thing.
     
  3. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,763
    Thanks Received:
    15,641
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +24,936
    ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬ The irony!


    Leftists hide behind environmentalism to abridge the rights of individuals….and their very methods are co-opted and used against them!

    “… business, political, and community leaders in San Diego have essentially surrendered to the organizing agenda of union leaders. Unions and their lawyers have effectively exploited the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to block proposed projects…”
    Dayton Public Policy Institute, a project of Labor Issues Solutions, LLC » CEQA Greenmail Still Effective for Unions in San Diego: Just a Cost of Doing Business for Pragmatic Civic Leaders


    “…Nashville-based Gaylord Entertainment exposed and resisted the union environmental extortion in 2007 and 2008 against the proposed $1.2 billion Chula Vista Bayfront Hotel and Convention Center.” Ibid.

    And…

    “…This extortion that unions use on projects that do not agree to use union labor is astounding. The silence form (sic) developers and the press on this is equally astounding.”

    So, it’s extortion if used by unions?
    How is it not extortion when used by the ‘greennuts’?


    Here is he correct definition of environmentalism: “… suddenly buried under legal demands to ensure the project won't interfere with dozens of different species, face hostile testimony at public hearings, and are forced to conduct lengthy, barely relevant environmental studies.”
    Are Labor Unions 'Greenmailing' Solar Power Companies? : TreeHugger
     
  4. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
     
  5. waltky
    Offline

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,823
    Thanks Received:
    1,789
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,873
    Granny says, "Dat's right - dem lib'ral tree-huggers onna decline...
    [​IMG]
    Percentage of Americans Who Identify as 'Environmentalists' Down 36 Points Since 1991
    April 26, 2016 – A Gallup poll released on Friday shows that the number of Americans who identify as environmentalists has dropped 36 points, from 78 percent in 1991 to 42 percent in 2016. There has also been a decline in Americans expressing concern about environmental problems, such as pollution.

     

Share This Page