Mr. P
VIP Member
I have to agree with an earlier post ...... the argument for ESC is not good, and any promise of hope has been the result of adult stem cell/cord blood research. Based on the article, if adult stem cell/cord blood has been successful; albeit, at a minimal level, but DOES hold promise, and ESC has all the inherent defects as listed, why the smoke and mirrors to sell us the latter when the former holds the most promise?
And WHAT exactly have we learned from space? We can recreate the environment of space right here, and save ourselves a lot of money in the process. Oh, but then, we DID beat the Russians to the Moon.
Seems to me most people in this argument lean heavily on emotion and not very much on the facts.
Do both, ASC and ESC.
What have we learned from space? You're not serious. Its not what weve learned from space necessarily, its what has been discovered along the way in the space program that has been of benefit.