For someone who claims to be so smart you still havn't figured out that all of that has to be manufactured. Manufacturing causes pollution of some sort you poor delusional nincompoop!I just listed them, you poor blind retard.
That was the fact that you felt blazing over your poor little pinhead. Twit!
I called you a "poor blind retard" and you immediately confirm that judgement. LOLOL.
From my post that you just quoted but were apparently unable to comprehend (see: 'retard'):
What? Are you blind? We have developed a number of virtually pollution free sources of electricity. Hydroelectric power has been tapped for well over a century now and accounts for 16 percent of global electricity consumption. Geothermal electricity production began on a very limited scale about a century ago in Italy and is now producing power in 24 different countries. Iceland is planning to power their entire country on geothermal and hydroelectric power. Building any kind of power plant or system involves some kinds of 'pollution' during construction but once they are in place fossil fuel power plants continue to pollute at a very high rate whereas solar and wind power systems are virtually pollution free. We have developed these sources, we just haven't deployed them yet in sufficient quantities to supplant the older fossil fuel high pollution power plants. The process has begun though and is accelerating.Now if we could develop a truly pollution free source of electricty THEN e;lectric cars would be pollution reducing policy.
You are such a stupid shithead, walleyed. All power plants, or any other kind of heavy industry or manufacturing, involves some level of 'pollution' in their construction or component manufacturing so there is no net gain or loss on that end between using old or new style power systems but in the long term operation there are enormous differences between the nominal 'pollution', but more explicitly the 'carbon emissions', that these different kinds of power plants produce. Fossil fuel plants emit large quantities of a number of different kinds of environmental pollutants and massive amounts of CO2 every hour that they are in operation whereas solar, wind and other renewables generally emit almost no conventional 'pollution' and no CO2 for as long as they are in operation, probably decades.
Y'know, you'd see the world a lot clearer if you'd just pull your head out of your ass once in a while.
Even your own link says "virtually" which is not none, as you claim silly person. And, I would love to see an audit made on the claim of "virtually" none. The wind power windbags love to talk about how clean their energy is but conveniently forget to mention the huge amount of pollution that is created in the manufacturing process.
And here's a free econ lesson for you. Electric cars that cost 40k are not going to be sold en mass. The general public can't afford them. The general public can't affordsolar either. Especially when it is pointed out to them that the break even point is around 5 years after the system has died.
The same goes for windmills. None of those power sources will do what you claim they will at the present time. They all cost far more than ANY fossil fuel power source. They are also FAR more polluting than gas and oil powered electric plants.
Those too are facts. And bloody inconvenient ones for you and your ilk.