Dutch authorities are corrupt ... Boeing Refuses to Cooperate With New Inquiry Into Deadly Crash

[Denizen]

Not only Dutch aviation safety authorities but Boeing and the NTSB are are corrupt.

It appears that if the investigation of the 2009 crash had not been corrupt the Boeing 737 Max crashes of 2018 and 2019 could have been prevented by identification of the cause of the crash in 2009 and proper remedial measures.

Why is there so much corruption around the Boeing 737 aircraft? What is being hidden from the public?

This corruption issue also destroys the credibility of Dutch Aviation Safety officials in the MH17 shootdown where they were the investigation agency.

Boeing Refuses to Cooperate With New Inquiry Into Deadly Crash

Boeing Refuses to Cooperate With New Inquiry Into Deadly Crash
Chris Hamby and Claire Moses 2 days ago

Boeing and American safety officials refused to cooperate on Thursday with a new inquiry by Dutch lawmakers into a deadly crash near Amsterdam in 2009 that had striking parallels with two more recent accidents involving the manufacturer’s 737 Max.

a group of people standing around a plane: Dutch lawmakers are reviewing an investigation into the 2009 crash of a Boeing 737 NG.

Members of the Dutch parliament wanted to question the Boeing chief executive, David Calhoun, about the company’s possible influence over the original Dutch investigation of the accident, which killed nine people on a Turkish Airlines flight. The National Transportation Safety Board also refused lawmakers’ request to participate.

The legislators initiated the review in the wake of a New York Times examination of evidence from the 2009 crash that found that Dutch safety authorities had either removed or played down some criticisms of Boeing in their accident report, after pushback from an American team that included the manufacturer and officials from the N.T.S.B. and the Federal Aviation Administration. ...

...
In both the Max accidents and the 2009 crash, which involved a 737 NG, Boeing’s design decisions allowed a single malfunctioning sensor to trigger a powerful computer command, even though the plane was equipped with two sensors. For both models, the company had determined that if a sensor failed, pilots would recognize the problem and recover the plane. But Boeing did not provide pilots with key information that could have helped them counteract the automation error.

After the 2009 crash, regulators required airlines to install a software update for the NG that allowed comparison of data from the two available sensors — much the same fix that Boeing has now proposed for the Max. In the case of the NG, Boeing had developed a software update before the 2009 accident, but it wasn’t compatible with all existing models, including the jet that crashed near Amsterdam. ...

 

[theHawk]

This your daily anti-Boeing post?

 

[Denizen]

This your daily anti-Boeing post?

Am I treading on your turf?