Double, Double, Toil and Trouble....

[alang1216]

Personally, I admire the way you define anything you feel is bad as being "Leftist". Anyone able to cast characters as different as Stalin and Hitler as leftists is a talent. I'm not sure way Freud is in the mix but since you like to politicize science (e.g., Darwin) I'm not very surprised.

Wait.....you don't know that Stalin and Hitler were both allies and both Leftists???

How dumb can you be????

Don't you know that Hitler's party was the national SOCIALIST party????

The depth of your ignorance is truly amazing.

Hitler and Stalin had a pact on paper and then invaded each others countries. Is that your criteria, what the paper says trumps what actually happened? Got it.

Hitler was an ultra-nationalist, hardly the mark of the Left.

Using your logic, I must assume you think that North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, must be a democracy. You should come down from your ivy tower and join us in the real world.

I never said could cure you of being an idiot, I simply provide the facts and allow those with your educational septicity to prattle on.


Until June 22, 1941, they were allies, with Stalin providing the resources for Hitler's Blitzkrieg.


Don't forget......never read a book!!!

As usual you tell 1/2 truths.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Personally, I admire the way you define anything you feel is bad as being "Leftist". Anyone able to cast characters as different as Stalin and Hitler as leftists is a talent. I'm not sure way Freud is in the mix but since you like to politicize science (e.g., Darwin) I'm not very surprised.

Wait.....you don't know that Stalin and Hitler were both allies and both Leftists???

How dumb can you be????

Don't you know that Hitler's party was the national SOCIALIST party????

The depth of your ignorance is truly amazing.

Hitler and Stalin had a pact on paper and then invaded each others countries. Is that your criteria, what the paper says trumps what actually happened? Got it.

Hitler was an ultra-nationalist, hardly the mark of the Left.

Using your logic, I must assume you think that North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, must be a democracy. You should come down from your ivy tower and join us in the real world.

I never said could cure you of being an idiot, I simply provide the facts and allow those with your educational septicity to prattle on.


Until June 22, 1941, they were allies, with Stalin providing the resources for Hitler's Blitzkrieg.


Don't forget......never read a book!!!

As usual you tell 1/2 truths.

That makes it 1/2 more than what you have.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[PoliticalChic]

Darwin was a dweeb, with many errors in his evolution theory.(notice theory - a science that is given but not proven). Each layer of the crust we find more and more evidence of difference in the way man evolved and some today think, that Neanderthals still have their linage, when people like Darwin thought they went extinct. I know the Neanderthals are still around and in the Democrat party.

Darwin made an enormous contribution to science. The fact that later generations added depth and nuance to his theories (which you define incorrectly) does not take anything away from his accomplishments.

I see you, like PC, can't separate science from politics. No wonder you two are so poor at both.

Liar: no one added any proof to Darwin's thesis.

In fact, the evidence shows the very opposite of 'proof.'


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Poor, poor Darwin.



Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world."
Extrait de:

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

 

[alang1216]

That makes it 1/2 more than what you have.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Easy to say, harder to prove.

 

[alang1216]

Darwin was a dweeb, with many errors in his evolution theory.(notice theory - a science that is given but not proven). Each layer of the crust we find more and more evidence of difference in the way man evolved and some today think, that Neanderthals still have their linage, when people like Darwin thought they went extinct. I know the Neanderthals are still around and in the Democrat party.

Darwin made an enormous contribution to science. The fact that later generations added depth and nuance to his theories (which you define incorrectly) does not take anything away from his accomplishments.

I see you, like PC, can't separate science from politics. No wonder you two are so poor at both.

Liar: no one added any proof to Darwin's thesis.

In fact, the evidence shows the very opposite of 'proof.'


" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Poor, poor Darwin.



Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world."
Extrait de:

So you are going for a God-of-the-gaps argument? Good luck, to date, that has failed every time. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

 

[alang1216]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

So you attack evolution, economics, and psychology based on work done 150 years ago? Maybe you should update your library with a few more recent works. Maybe even something from THIS CENTURY?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

That makes it 1/2 more than what you have.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Easy to say, harder to prove.

I notice you're not denying it so that must mean if you start telling half the truth then PC would be telling the whole truth.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

So you attack evolution, economics, and psychology based on work done 150 years ago? Maybe you should update your library with a few more recent works. Maybe even something from THIS CENTURY?

I 'attacked' none of those.


I simply proved that Darwin's thesis is considered true for one reason only: it supports Marxism.


And, I showed that you are a liar.

This is the explanation for your lie in defense of Darwin.

"The deniers first deceive themselves that they are sincere in their adherence to falsehoods. Thus they cannot be faulted for acting on genuinely held views. But in truth, they have cultivated an ignorance of the facts, what Thomas Aquinas called ignorantia affectata. An ignorance so useful that one protects it at all costs, in order to continue using it in one’s own self interest. This ignorance is not exculpatory, but inculpatory. Forgive them not, for they know full well what they do.' RICHARD BADALAMENTE

 

[Damaged Eagle]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

So you attack evolution, economics, and psychology based on work done 150 years ago? Maybe you should update your library with a few more recent works. Maybe even something from THIS CENTURY?

THIS CENTURY??? Are you kidding?

This century all science appears to be based on the high alter of "scientific consensus" while they have their Witches Hammer to convict burn desenters at the stake... Yet I still see ice and polar bears up in the Arctic region and two some million people have not died as of this time which the scientific consensus models say should have already come about.

Even Siggy had more going for him in in scientific development and the study of the human mind than the idiots from this century.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Personally, I admire the way you define anything you feel is bad as being "Leftist". Anyone able to cast characters as different as Stalin and Hitler as leftists is a talent. I'm not sure way Freud is in the mix but since you like to politicize science (e.g., Darwin) I'm not very surprised.

Wait.....you don't know that Stalin and Hitler were both allies and both Leftists???

How dumb can you be????

Don't you know that Hitler's party was the national SOCIALIST party????

The depth of your ignorance is truly amazing.

Hitler and Stalin had a pact on paper and then invaded each others countries. Is that your criteria, what the paper says trumps what actually happened? Got it.

Hitler was an ultra-nationalist, hardly the mark of the Left.

Using your logic, I must assume you think that North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, must be a democracy. You should come down from your ivy tower and join us in the real world.

Liberals are too stupid to read what history was all about because if they knew history they wouldnt be stupid liberals.

The Road to Serfdom | Friedrich A. Hayek

The description below is written for the Definitive Edition of Road to Serfdom which is sold in the Mises Store and can be previewed here: Google Preview. Finally, here is an edition of Road to Serfdom that does justice to its monumental status in the history of liberty.

mises.org

 

[PoliticalChic]

Personally, I admire the way you define anything you feel is bad as being "Leftist". Anyone able to cast characters as different as Stalin and Hitler as leftists is a talent. I'm not sure way Freud is in the mix but since you like to politicize science (e.g., Darwin) I'm not very surprised.

Wait.....you don't know that Stalin and Hitler were both allies and both Leftists???

How dumb can you be????

Don't you know that Hitler's party was the national SOCIALIST party????

The depth of your ignorance is truly amazing.

Hitler and Stalin had a pact on paper and then invaded each others countries. Is that your criteria, what the paper says trumps what actually happened? Got it.

Hitler was an ultra-nationalist, hardly the mark of the Left.

Using your logic, I must assume you think that North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, must be a democracy. You should come down from your ivy tower and join us in the real world.

Liberals are too stupid to read what history was all about because if they knew history they wouldnt be stupid liberals.

The Road to Serfdom | Friedrich A. Hayek

The description below is written for the Definitive Edition of Road to Serfdom which is sold in the Mises Store and can be previewed here: Google Preview. Finally, here is an edition of Road to Serfdom that does justice to its monumental status in the history of liberty.

mises.org

It is quite a phenomenon.

They not only don't hesitate to parrot the party line.....but when the party reverses itself 180°-....they parrot the new line without a hesitation.

Orwell presaged it when war was either Eurasia or East Asia.....and back and forth.


Yet the dumbest of them still claim Bill Clinton isn't a rapist, even though their leaders have admitted it.
It's difficult to find good help these days.

 

[alang1216]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

So you attack evolution, economics, and psychology based on work done 150 years ago? Maybe you should update your library with a few more recent works. Maybe even something from THIS CENTURY?

View attachment 332749

THIS CENTURY??? Are you kidding?

This century all science appears to be based on the high alter of "scientific consensus" while they have their Witches Hammer to convict burn desenters at the stake... Yet I still see ice and polar bears up in the Arctic region and two some million people have not died as of this time which the scientific consensus models say should have already come about.

Even Siggy had more going for him in in scientific development and the study of the human mind than the idiots from this century.

*****CHUCKLE*****

I guess that is why science never comes up with anything useful and life is unchanged from the days of Darwin.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Valuable to the collectivists is Freud’s claim that people are not endowed with free will. The idea is that childhood experiences determine what we are and what we do.
Hence, the importance of government school to the totalitarians.


Here's what they don't want you to know:

“Freud was a charlatan, …He was a quack who routinely proscribed measuring to patients, then wrote fictional papers bragging about his phenomenal results. In one 1896 lecture, he claimed that by uncovering childhood sexual trauma he had healed some eighteen patients, he later admitted he hadn’t cured anyone.”
Ben Shapiro, “The Right Side Of History,” p. 166



Basing their ideas on science and reason.....is Freud 'science'?
Nope.....
Who says not?
He does.

“Freud's claims skirted falsifiability, the quality of being testable, a bedrock of the scientific method. Resistance to his lurid suggestions, he argued, meant only that he was onto something; heads I win, tails you really do want to fellate your father. He also conspired to excommunicate any analyst from the movement who dared to subject his ideas to critical scrutiny.

As Freud wrote to a close colleague, he was only "fantasizing, interpreting, and guessing" toward "bold but beautiful revelations." He claimed: "I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ad0011a4f70f


Three frauds and failures: Darwin, Marx, and Freud.

But, not of course, if you went to government school and never thought for yourself.

So you attack evolution, economics, and psychology based on work done 150 years ago? Maybe you should update your library with a few more recent works. Maybe even something from THIS CENTURY?

View attachment 332749

THIS CENTURY??? Are you kidding?

This century all science appears to be based on the high alter of "scientific consensus" while they have their Witches Hammer to convict burn desenters at the stake... Yet I still see ice and polar bears up in the Arctic region and two some million people have not died as of this time which the scientific consensus models say should have already come about.

Even Siggy had more going for him in in scientific development and the study of the human mind than the idiots from this century.

*****CHUCKLE*****

I guess that is why science never comes up with anything useful and life is unchanged from the days of Darwin.

It appears, after I exploded your lie about Darwin, you've thrown in the towel.

As usual, a day late and a dollar short.

 

[alang1216]

Personally, I admire the way you define anything you feel is bad as being "Leftist". Anyone able to cast characters as different as Stalin and Hitler as leftists is a talent. I'm not sure way Freud is in the mix but since you like to politicize science (e.g., Darwin) I'm not very surprised.

Wait.....you don't know that Stalin and Hitler were both allies and both Leftists???

How dumb can you be????

Don't you know that Hitler's party was the national SOCIALIST party????

The depth of your ignorance is truly amazing.

Hitler and Stalin had a pact on paper and then invaded each others countries. Is that your criteria, what the paper says trumps what actually happened? Got it.

Hitler was an ultra-nationalist, hardly the mark of the Left.

Using your logic, I must assume you think that North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, must be a democracy. You should come down from your ivy tower and join us in the real world.

Liberals are too stupid to read what history was all about because if they knew history they wouldnt be stupid liberals.

The Road to Serfdom | Friedrich A. Hayek

The description below is written for the Definitive Edition of Road to Serfdom which is sold in the Mises Store and can be previewed here: Google Preview. Finally, here is an edition of Road to Serfdom that does justice to its monumental status in the history of liberty.

mises.org

Alright Mr Historian, which libertarian society, past or present, would you want to live in?

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Seems that the great minds of the Left, the ‘three witches,’ Freud, Darwin, Marx, whose ideas support the mechanistic and materialistic views of mankind and his place in the universe, are nothing but liars and charlatans.


But they are useful toward this end, the totalitarian end:

"We can see that all elements of the socialist ideal--the abolition of private property, family, hierarchies; the hostility toward religion--could be regarded as a manifestation of one basic principle: the suppression of individuality.... All this is inspired by one principle--the destruction of individuality or, at least, its suppression to the point where it would cease to be a social force. "
Igor Shafarevich
The Socialist Phenomenon The Socialist Phenomenon by Igor Shafarevich



On the other side, "This is the great contribution of our Judeo-Christian foundation to Western civilization. The principles of justice are laid down in the Torah and the Gospels, and implemented through human actions memorialized in judicial codes.
The written laws and rules are codifications of the unwritten ones worked out over millennia as the result of human interactions and experience."
David Mamet




Where do we go, unmoored from the spiritual views that supported us for thousands of years, adrift and possible under the thumb of a party now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Does Western Civilization spiral down into the abyss, or is there a way back? Or is there a Phoenix-like chapter that ends the story?

Looking around us, it is difficult to be optimistic.

 

[alang1216]

It appears, after I exploded your lie about Darwin, you've thrown in the towel.

As usual, a day late and a dollar short.

You mean your deep and insightful boast: "I simply proved that Darwin's thesis is considered true for one reason only: it supports Marxism"?

You proved absolutely nothing. Darwin's thesis (descent from a common ancestor) is a scientific fact that you could not dispute. The best you were able to do was find gaps in the fossil record and make your wild claims (sans evidence).

If Marx used Darwin to support his economics that has little to do with Darwin. If you possessed any imagination and could do more than cut and paste (and insult) you could easily make the case that Darwin's work supported the free market with all the players competing for their economic survival.

 

[alang1216]

7. Seems that the great minds of the Left, the ‘three witches,’ Freud, Darwin, Marx, whose ideas support the mechanistic and materialistic views of mankind and his place in the universe, are nothing but liars and charlatans.


But they are useful toward this end, the totalitarian end:

"We can see that all elements of the socialist ideal--the abolition of private property, family, hierarchies; the hostility toward religion--could be regarded as a manifestation of one basic principle: the suppression of individuality.... All this is inspired by one principle--the destruction of individuality or, at least, its suppression to the point where it would cease to be a social force. "
Igor Shafarevich
The Socialist Phenomenon The Socialist Phenomenon by Igor Shafarevich



On the other side, "This is the great contribution of our Judeo-Christian foundation to Western civilization. The principles of justice are laid down in the Torah and the Gospels, and implemented through human actions memorialized in judicial codes.
The written laws and rules are codifications of the unwritten ones worked out over millennia as the result of human interactions and experience."
David Mamet




Where do we go, unmoored from the spiritual views that supported us for thousands of years, adrift and possible under the thumb of a party now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Does Western Civilization spiral down into the abyss, or is there a way back? Or is there a Phoenix-like chapter that ends the story?

Looking around us, it is difficult to be optimistic.

Western culture was born in ancient Greece and was passed to us via the Romans. Both those societies experimented with democracy and were pagan.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It appears, after I exploded your lie about Darwin, you've thrown in the towel.

As usual, a day late and a dollar short.

You mean your deep and insightful boast: "I simply proved that Darwin's thesis is considered true for one reason only: it supports Marxism"?

You proved absolutely nothing. Darwin's thesis (descent from a common ancestor) is a scientific fact that you could not dispute. The best you were able to do was find gaps in the fossil record and make your wild claims (sans evidence).

If Marx used Darwin to support his economics that has little to do with Darwin. If you possessed any imagination and could do more than cut and paste (and insult) you could easily make the case that Darwin's work supported the free market with all the players competing for their economic survival.

"Darwin's thesis (descent from a common ancestor) is a scientific fact that you could not dispute. "

Watch me:

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski

And I proved you a liar yet again.


NEXT!

 

[alang1216]

It appears, after I exploded your lie about Darwin, you've thrown in the towel.

As usual, a day late and a dollar short.

You mean your deep and insightful boast: "I simply proved that Darwin's thesis is considered true for one reason only: it supports Marxism"?

You proved absolutely nothing. Darwin's thesis (descent from a common ancestor) is a scientific fact that you could not dispute. The best you were able to do was find gaps in the fossil record and make your wild claims (sans evidence).

If Marx used Darwin to support his economics that has little to do with Darwin. If you possessed any imagination and could do more than cut and paste (and insult) you could easily make the case that Darwin's work supported the free market with all the players competing for their economic survival.

"Darwin's thesis (descent from a common ancestor) is a scientific fact that you could not dispute. "

Watch me:

"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski

And I proved you a liar yet again.


NEXT!

No you proved yourself a builder of Straw men: "The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."

So? We have never seen gravity, only the effects it has on mass. So too, evolution.