Don't try to argue with me...

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by dmp, May 18, 2005.

  1. dmp
    Offline

    dmp Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    13,088
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Ratings:
    +741
    Found this gem online...sorry if you've read it.


    I argue very well. Ask any of my remaining friends. I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent. People know this, and steer clear of me at parties. Often, as a sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me. You too can win arguments. Simply follow these rules:


    * Drink Liquor.
    Suppose you're at a party and some hotshot intellectual is expounding on the economy of Peru, a subject you know nothing about. If you're drinking some health-fanatic drink like grapefruit juice, you'll hang back, afraid to display your ignorance, while the hotshot enthralls your date. But if you drink several large martinis, you'll discover you have STRONG VIEWS about the Peruvian economy. You'll be a WEALTH of information. You'll argue forcefully, offering searing insights and possibly upsetting furniture. People will be impressed. Some may leave the room.


    * Make things up.
    Suppose, in the Peruvian economy argument, you are trying to prove Peruvians are underpaid, a position you base solely on the fact that YOU are underpaid, and you're damned if you're going to let a bunch of Peruvians be better off. DON'T say: "I think Peruvians are underpaid." Say: "The average Peruvian's salary in 1981 dollars adjusted for the revised tax base is $1,452.81 per annum, which is $836.07 before the mean gross poverty level."


    NOTE: Always make up exact figures.
    If an opponent asks you where you got your information, make THAT up, too. Say: "This information comes from Dr. Hovel T. Moon's study for the Buford Commission published May 9, 1982. Didn't you read it?" Say this in the same tone of voice you would use to say "You left your soiled underwear in my bath house."


    * Use meaningless but weightly-sounding words and phrases.
    Memorize this list:

    Let me put it this way

    In terms of

    Vis-a-vis

    Per se

    As it were

    Qua

    So to speak

    You should also memorize some Latin abbreviations such as "Q.E.D.," "e.g.," and "i.e." These are all short for "I speak Latin, and you do not."

    Here's how to use these words and phrases. Suppose you want to say: "Peruvians would like to order appetizers more often, but they don't have enough money."

    You never win arguments talking like that. But you WILL win if you say: "Let me put it this way. In terms of appetizers vis-a-vis Peruvians qua Peruvians, they would like to order them more often, so to speak, but they do not have enough money per se, as it were. Q.E.D."

    Only a fool would challenge that statement.


    * Use snappy and irrelevant comebacks.
    You need an arsenal of all-purpose irrelevent phrases to fire back at your opponents when they make valid points. The best are:


    You're begging the question.

    You're being defensive.

    Don't compare apples and oranges.

    What are your parameters?

    This last one is especially valuable. Nobody, other than mathematicians, has the vaguest idea what "parameters" means.

    Here's how to use your comebacks:

    You say: "As Abraham Lincoln said in 1873..."
    Your opponents says: "Lincoln died in 1865."
    You say: "You're begging the question."

    OR

    You say: "Liberians, like most Asians..."
    Your opponents says: "Liberia is in Africa."
    You say: "You're being defensive."


    * Compare your opponent to Adolf Hitler.
    This is your heavy artillery, for when your opponent is obviously right and you are spectacularly wrong. Bring Hitler up subtly. Say: "That sounds suspiciously like something Adolf Hitler might say" or "You certainly do remind me of Adolf Hitler."

    So that's it: you now know how to out-argue anybody. Do not try to pull any of this on people who generally carry weapons.


    :D
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    This would be funny if it didn't happen so often on this board!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    I was about to say the same thing.
     
  4. no1tovote4
    Offline

    no1tovote4 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,294
    Thanks Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +616

    You're begging the question. i.e. sine qua non. QED.
     

Share This Page