Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AVATAR 4321 said,
"BTW Romney has done more for the poor than Barack Obama ever will. And he didnt need to use government to do it"
All I could do is laugh at this comment.
Sokar,
It is kind of sad that you use pictures of celebrities to express yourself. I am sure you can't be that macho if you need to use another man's photo. Also, I don't look at all like the woman in the other photo.
Sokar,
It is kind of sad that you use pictures of celebrities to express yourself. I am sure you can't be that macho if you need to use another man's photo. Also, I don't look at all like the woman in the other photo.
Freud once said, "A definition of sanity is ones ability to deal with reality." Unfortunately political realities consist of lies, deception, manipulation, as well as altruism, & public service. Given a chance to choose, and not liking the choices, really isn't an excuse to do nothing. In politics compromise is often the only way to get things done.
AVATAR 4321 said,
"BTW Romney has done more for the poor than Barack Obama ever will. And he didnt need to use government to do it"
All I could do is laugh at this comment.
Doesnt change the fact that it's true.
AVATAR 4321 said,
"BTW Romney has done more for the poor than Barack Obama ever will. And he didnt need to use government to do it"
All I could do is laugh at this comment.
Doesnt change the fact that it's true.
If Romney can be accused of anything, it's being a Dudley Do-Right.
I would bet if I had to that we will have a very low voter turnout for the GE as well. Obama has lost a huge sum of his base and Mitt never really had a base. It's two subpar politicians looking to use the winning of the Presidential seta as a way to say "see, people do like me." Neither are leaders, neither have good ideas and in fact neither is really that different from each other based on past polices.
I'd say the only thing Mitt has going for him is that if he wins there will be a initial boost in the economy and outlook, just as there was under Obama, because that is what happens when a new president steps into office no matter what. I just wonder if Mitt will squander it faster than Bush or Obama did.
We had RECORD LOW turnout for this years primary. If this is indicative of what the general election voter turnout, not good. Twenty percent of this countries people will choose the political leaders for the whole population. Personally I feel that Obama has done a great job. He entered office in the middle of a historical crisis. Middle and lower class families are in for more severe hardships at the hands of Romney and his cohorts if he wins. Women's rights both financially & personally will get trampled. Children's needs (education, health, and well being) slashed with budget cuts. GET OUT & VOTE! Romney does not care about the needs of poor and middle class. He actually believes that corporations are people. Unless you WANT to be governed by people who care more about corporate profits and tax breaks for the wealthy, than you & yours. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD ON ELECTION DAY!
3 hours ago via mobile · Like
Oh I plan to go out and vote for Romney.
BTW Romney has done more for the poor than Barack Obama ever will. And he didnt need to use government to do it.
I would bet if I had to that we will have a very low voter turnout for the GE as well. Obama has lost a huge sum of his base and Mitt never really had a base. It's two subpar politicians looking to use the winning of the Presidential seta as a way to say "see, people do like me." Neither are leaders, neither have good ideas and in fact neither is really that different from each other based on past polices.
I'd say the only thing Mitt has going for him is that if he wins there will be a initial boost in the economy and outlook, just as there was under Obama, because that is what happens when a new president steps into office no matter what. I just wonder if Mitt will squander it faster than Bush or Obama did.
Id have to double check, but I am pretty sure that the economy and outlook got worse, not better, when it was apparant that Obama was going to win.