Don't make a Mistake...

[Redfish]

LOL, you run with that kid.

Oh, no you go ahead and share where Mueller spent a single day in court trying someone. Go ahead. I'm all ears.

You're all something but it isn't brains. The things he passed off were a distraction from his real objective. Using your logic Rump is "exonerated" because Mueller didn't "pass off" anything concerning Rump.

No... because

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

I really do think some of you people are mentally retarded.

<YAWN!>

How does that stop him from saying whether Trump is guilty of obstruction?

Because it isn't his job to do that. Congress is the only people who can do anything about it... basic civics.

congress doesnt prosecute people, DOJ or local state or city prosecutors do that. Mueller's charge was to investigate and determine if any prosecutable crimes had been committed, he found none. Its over.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion.

Actually it does if the obstruction was meant to conceal facts concerning collusion.

yes, but Mueller found none of that. If he did indictments would have been issued. but you are correct that its not over, Clinton, Comey, Lynch, McCabe, Strzok, Page, and possibly Barry himself are now the subjects of the investigation that they started.

yes, but Mueller found none of that. If he did indictments would have been issued.

That's not what Mueller concluded. He concluded , and said so very clearly, that a sitting president cannot be indicted under DOJ rules, dope.

yes, that has been the rule since 1776. Mueller found no crimes that Trump or anyone in his campaign could be indicted for before or after he leaves office. Sorry, dude, but you lefties lost again.

It's been the rule since 1973.
Mueller didn't say that at all. Read the report, dope.

 

[gipper]

A 300 page report that vindicated the President isn't good enough? If there was no crime there can't be any obstruction. The crazy left is desperate because Hillary and Hussein and radical elements of the FBI might be in the hot seat.

Yes and if they are in the hot seat, what are they going to do about it?

It is very unlikely that BO, Hill, and gang are going to go quietly. I suspect if the Justice Department actually does start prosecuting, the gang is going to burn it all down, along with lots of help from their friends in the MSM and billionaire class.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. That the fundamental principle of the American legal system, dumb fuck. Do you actually believe Trump has to prove his innocence? You're dumber than I ever imagined.

Holy shit are you dumb.

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

Irrelevant. Mueller could have stated that the evidence strongly indicates Trump is guilty of obstruction but he will not try to indict Trump while he is in office, but recommends the Justice Department indict him once he leaves office if he believed there was evidence to support such a statement. Obviously Mueller didn't believe there was evidence to support an indictment even after Trump left office.

No, that wasn't Mueller's job and since Comey's fiasco before the election, they agreed that his investigation would not be handled that way. He would investigate and turn over the evidence.

Now you're just making things up.

Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, has marshaled prosecutors, F.B.I. agents and other lawyers to investigate Russia’s 2016 election interference and whether any Trump associates conspired. The team has secured indictments against dozens of people and three companies, one trial conviction and a handful of guilty pleas in the highest-profile political inquiry in a generation.

Robert Mueller and His Prosecutors: Who They Are and What They’ve Done

Clearly, Mueller's team did conclude some people were guilty of crimes and prosecuted them. He could have done the same thing by stating that the evidence indicated Trump was guilty of obstruction but he was delaying an indictment until Trump was out of office, but he knew the evidence was not strong enough for an indictment.

No. Mueller at no point said he would make a decision on whether Trump was guilty or not. Feel free to show where he said he would. Fact is, he didn't want to make the same mistake Comey did in making the investigation political. You obviously haven't read his letter to Barr despite me posting it here for you. He quite clearly says Barr did not accurately summarize the results of the investigation. Then there is a full paragraph about what Mueller was expecting:

"Accordingly, the enclosed documents are in a form that can be released to the public consistent with legal requirements and Department policies. I am requesting that you provide these materials to Congress and authorize their public release at this time."

Read Robert Mueller’s Private Letter to William Barr Objecting to His Summary of Special Counsel’s Investigation

Mueller was a prosecutor and that's what prosecutors do. He made the decision on the collusion hoax the Democrats were pushing and he should have made a decision on obstruction, but he decided to politicize the issue, a serious ethical infraction, by suggesting he was leaving the decision on obstruction Congress, something he had no legitimate right to do.

 

[toomuchtime_]

And YET Mueller was clear on the fact he was NOT reporting to Congress under the law NOTHING he wrote had to be delivered to CONGRESS. A Law the democrats created.

That's not what he said at all. He had the report written specifically so that the overview of the report was already redacted and could be turned over without Barr making his own.

It literally says in his letter to Barr to give it to Congress. It is in the second paragraph.

It was improper, unprofessional and perhaps even unethical for Mueller to attempt to control the political aspects of the release of the report. Mueller's job ended when he turned in his report to the AG, and unless asked by the AG, he has no further role in determining what happens to the report. Notice that Mueller has not contradicted anything Barr has said and only comments on the political impact, in his opinion, of the way the report was released. This is just one more bizarre act by Mueller who seems to have a very grandiose notion of his place in history.

That's not true whatsoever. He literally said in the letters to Barr that Barr did not give a true representation of the findings of the report.

Wrong. He didn't say that.

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations. See Department of Justice, Press Release (May 17, 2017)."

Read Robert Mueller’s Private Letter to William Barr Objecting to His Summary of Special Counsel’s Investigation

He didn't?

Yet Mueller didn't contradict anything Barr said, so what specifically didn't he like about the way Barr handled it? No one knows.

 

[Redfish]

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion.

Actually it does if the obstruction was meant to conceal facts concerning collusion.

yes, but Mueller found none of that. If he did indictments would have been issued. but you are correct that its not over, Clinton, Comey, Lynch, McCabe, Strzok, Page, and possibly Barry himself are now the subjects of the investigation that they started.

yes, but Mueller found none of that. If he did indictments would have been issued.

That's not what Mueller concluded. He concluded , and said so very clearly, that a sitting president cannot be indicted under DOJ rules, dope.

yes, that has been the rule since 1776. Mueller found no crimes that Trump or anyone in his campaign could be indicted for before or after he leaves office. Sorry, dude, but you lefties lost again.

It's been the rule since 1973.
Mueller didn't say that at all. Read the report, dope.

did Mueller issue or refer any indictments? No
did he find any collusion by the trump campaign with Russia? No
did he find any indictable obstruction by anyone? No

If he had found evidence of any crimes he would have outlined them and referred them for prosecution. He didn't.

as much as you libs were hoping that Mueller would find a way to remove Trump, he didn't.

Trump will be president for another 6 years, not one of the democrat clown show members has a chance in 2020. The economy is booming, unemployment is at record lows, the market is up------------and all the dems have is socialism and illegals, and of course, infanticide.