Don't forget the democrats created the KKK

[The T]

You have proof?

Welcome to the Ku Klux Klan: Knights Party

Bringing a Message of Hope and Deliverance to White Christian America! A Message of Love NOT Hate!
PO Box 2222, Harrison, AR 72601
870-427-3414


Click here for the main Knights Party, USA website

America, Our Nation is Under Judgement from God!
"There is a race war against whites. But our people - my white brothers and sisters - will stay committed to a non-violent resolution. That resolution must consist of solidarity in white communities around the world. The hatred for our children and their future is growing and is being fueled every single day. Stay firm in your convictions. Keep loving your heritage and keep witnessing to others that there is a better way than a war torn, violent, wicked, socialist, new world order. That way is the Christian way - law and order - love of family - love of nation. These are the principles of western Christian civilization. There is a war to destroy these things. Pray that our people see the error of their ways and regain a sense of loyalty. Repent America! Be faithful my fellow believers. "

National Director of The Knights, Pastor Thomas Robb

Nothing about Republicans there.

These IDIOTS forget just WHOM started the KKK...

Nathan Bedford Forrest...a Confederate...

Nathan Bedford Forrest (July 13, 1821 – October 29, 1877) was a lieutenant general in the Confederate Army during the American Civil War. He is remembered both as a self-educated, innovative cavalry leader during the war and as a leading southern advocate in the postwar years. He served as the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, a secret vigilante organization which launched a reign of terrorism against blacks and Republicans during Reconstruction in the South.[1]

_____________________________

Rut-Roh Gracie Against Republicans too? So that must've made him what?

A. Crazy

B.Resentful

C. DEMOCRAT

D. ALL the ABOVE...

SOURCE

 

[Care4all]

Provide actual proof of that Statement. Or admit you made it up.

david duke wanted to run for office on the republican ticket....is all i know....but couldn't due to some plea agreement to not run for office ......on some tax case the gvt had against him in 2002, i believe?

the KKK does not and would NEVER support a black president or his party, so i would guess that at this time, the KKK would be supporters of the republican ticket....it's just an educated guess on my part though....

Because a single person chooses to run on a ticket does not, in fact proof anything about an entire party, not of its make up nor provides evidence a ludicrous claim is true. Unless you or Ravi or some other person can provide empirical data proving the claim, stop making it.

then stop those on the right from saying the democrats today are the KKK members, SINCE you say it can't be determined....or rather, show the ''evidence'' that the kkk today is made up of democrats....prove it....or tell your cohorts saying such, to prove it.... what's good for the goose, is good for the gander, no?

btw, the KKK of today, are bible thumpers....seems unlikely they are democratic Bible thumpers....

Ku Klux Klan LLC. - FAQ page
Ku Klux Klan LLC. -Know Your Rights -

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVzJ2RIlUwE]YouTube - American Heritage- KKK Lynching (killing) Republicans D9-P2-10:00[/ame]

 

[The T]

What???

Geez our public schools suck...

Let’s bury this “three-fifths of a person” nonsense. The people who spout this idiocy are either lying or grossly ignorant. With the Times, I’ll take lying; with Fox News Channel, I’ll assume ignorance. Just how hard is it to read the Constitution to see what it really says? If that leaves you still confused, allow me to help you out here with a little history lesson about the Three-fifths Compromise reached at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. You’ll see that there is no evidence to support oft-repeated claims by so many liberals and race pimps that the Constitution is racist.

In 1787, delegates from 13 colonies were meeting in Philadelphia trying to hammer out a document to form a new union — The United States of America. Different colonies, though, had different goals. The Northern colonies were determined to end slavery. Southern colonies felt slavery was necessary for their economic survival. The issue came to a head during discussions on how the populations of the various states would be counted to determine representation in the newly formed House of Representatives. Convention delegates opposed to slavery (generally from the North) wanted to count only the free inhabitants of each state. Southern delegates wanted every slave counted. Why? Because the higher population numbers would give them more members in the House.

A compromise was reached. For the purpose of congressional apportionment, Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the new Constitution provided that the state populations would be determined by the number of free persons in each state and adding “three fifths of all other persons.” In other words, for every 100 slaves in the state, 60 people would be added to its population count. Indentured slaves were counted as free persons and “Indians not taxed” were left out of the tally entirely. There was NO mention of race and NO suggestion that anyone counted as three-fifths of a human being. There were, by the way, black slave owners who were counted and white slaves who were not. But let’s not cause too much stress for delicate minds...

SOURCE

____________________

WHY would Non-slave States capitulate in giving Southern States MORE power in the electorate by counting people whom were NOT free by BODY COUNT? Free to Vote? Have Freedom of their own accord?

Especially when we were a YOUNG country and had just WON our independence from a CROWN that practiced Slavery, and did NOT accord slaves freedom but to acheive political goals?

We fought for FREEDOM...were the SLAVES free to vote at that time?

*NO* they were not.

AS the Constitution was worded for apportionment of Electors?

WHY give States that held SLAVES that were denied FREEDOM more of a say?

*LOGIC* The 3/5ths agreemmnet settled the deal...and was later carried to it's fruition in the CIVIL WAR.

Its somewhat valid.. That 3/5ths thing was waaaaay before the Civil War...

That was a colonial thing.

I don't want to get into that now because its irrelevant.

It's as relevant TODAY as it was then. Don't delude yerself. PAY attention.

 

[Modbert]

I remember when trolling use to be an artform.

 

[The T]

You have proof?

Welcome to the Ku Klux Klan: Knights Party

Bringing a Message of Hope and Deliverance to White Christian America! A Message of Love NOT Hate!
PO Box 2222, Harrison, AR 72601
870-427-3414


Click here for the main Knights Party, USA website

America, Our Nation is Under Judgement from God!
"There is a race war against whites. But our people - my white brothers and sisters - will stay committed to a non-violent resolution. That resolution must consist of solidarity in white communities around the world. The hatred for our children and their future is growing and is being fueled every single day. Stay firm in your convictions. Keep loving your heritage and keep witnessing to others that there is a better way than a war torn, violent, wicked, socialist, new world order. That way is the Christian way - law and order - love of family - love of nation. These are the principles of western Christian civilization. There is a war to destroy these things. Pray that our people see the error of their ways and regain a sense of loyalty. Repent America! Be faithful my fellow believers. "

National Director of The Knights, Pastor Thomas Robb

Nothing about Republicans there.

Nothing at all. ON the mark.

 

[The T]

I remember when trolling use to be an artform.

You should since YOU are a leader in this regard.

Thanks for acknowledging what WE already KNOW.

Good Form ClodBert.

 

[Modbert]

You should since YOU are a leader in this regard.

Thanks for acknowledging what WE already KNOW.

Good Form ClodBert.

Wouldn't waste my time trolling here. It'd be like kicking water uphill. However, this thread is blatant trolling. That or the OP is a complete and utter moron. Or a combination of the two.

 

[whitehall]

Okay, I won't.

I also won't forget that most current members of the KKK are either Republicans or vote for Republicans.

A running joke in law enforcement for years was that there were more federal agents in the KKK than there were members. Informing on (democrat) fellow members of the KKK during the 50's and 60's was a cottage industry in the rural south. Take a look at the profoundly racist cartoons depicting George Bush's Secretary of State Dr. Condie Rice as a slave mammy and understand that racism is alive and well in the democrat party as well as elitist liberal media outlets.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Yeah... and you are sorely in need of them.

What sources and citations do you have that validates your assertion on the Civil War??

Have you read " A People's History of The United States" By Howard Zinn....

Of course not... he was a "pinko/commie/socialist/bastard".

However... to this day... they use it in most of our universities as a supplemental history. One that shows "the other side" of our great nation. Not as a mainstream... but as a supplement. To show that:

A. Things were never as rosy as we think.
B. That those people who suffered with nothing actually did matter.

and finally

C. That powerful people with selfish goals are just as fucked up as totalitarian governments.

The truth is.. the Civil War was fought because rich white people in one geographic area did not want to relinquish their meal ticket.... Slavery, and Rich white people in another geographic area felt "above" the idea of slavery(conveniently... their growing seasons were much shorter).

The cause of the Civil War wasn't as much about slavery as it was about power. But slavery was the catalyst.

Howard Zinn...

The Civil War was NOT about slavery... Slavery just happened to be a convenient excuse.

Hell, the south was printing their own money...

The notion that every white family in the south had slaves is fucking retarded...

What do you think? white people didn't work in the south???

 

[del]

best thread ever

 

[Political Junky]

Lyndon B. Johnson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Civil Rights
Johnson signed the revised and stronger bill into law on July 2, 1964.[46] Legend has it that, as he put down his pen, Johnson told an aide, "We have lost the South for a generation", anticipating a coming backlash from Southern whites against Johnson's Democratic Party.[47]

 

[Modbert]

best thread ever

 

[The T]

Welcome to the Ku Klux Klan: Knights Party

Bringing a Message of Hope and Deliverance to White Christian America! A Message of Love NOT Hate!
PO Box 2222, Harrison, AR 72601
870-427-3414


Click here for the main Knights Party, USA website

America, Our Nation is Under Judgement from God!
"There is a race war against whites. But our people - my white brothers and sisters - will stay committed to a non-violent resolution. That resolution must consist of solidarity in white communities around the world. The hatred for our children and their future is growing and is being fueled every single day. Stay firm in your convictions. Keep loving your heritage and keep witnessing to others that there is a better way than a war torn, violent, wicked, socialist, new world order. That way is the Christian way - law and order - love of family - love of nation. These are the principles of western Christian civilization. There is a war to destroy these things. Pray that our people see the error of their ways and regain a sense of loyalty. Repent America! Be faithful my fellow believers. "

National Director of The Knights, Pastor Thomas Robb

Nothing about Republicans there.

These IDIOTS forget just WHOM started the KKK...

Nathan Bedford Forrest...a Confederate...

Nathan Bedford Forrest (July 13, 1821 – October 29, 1877) was a lieutenant general in the Confederate Army during the American Civil War. He is remembered both as a self-educated, innovative cavalry leader during the war and as a leading southern advocate in the postwar years. He served as the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, a secret vigilante organization which launched a reign of terrorism against blacks and Republicans during Reconstruction in the South.[1]

_____________________________

Rut-Roh Gracie Against Republicans too? So that must've made him what?

A. Crazy

B.Resentful

C. DEMOCRAT

D. ALL the ABOVE...

SOURCE

I should have entered E...RASCIST...but *THAT is a GIVEN*

 

[Mr.Nick]

Let’s bury this “three-fifths of a person” nonsense. The people who spout this idiocy are either lying or grossly ignorant. With the Times, I’ll take lying; with Fox News Channel, I’ll assume ignorance. Just how hard is it to read the Constitution to see what it really says? If that leaves you still confused, allow me to help you out here with a little history lesson about the Three-fifths Compromise reached at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. You’ll see that there is no evidence to support oft-repeated claims by so many liberals and race pimps that the Constitution is racist.

In 1787, delegates from 13 colonies were meeting in Philadelphia trying to hammer out a document to form a new union — The United States of America. Different colonies, though, had different goals. The Northern colonies were determined to end slavery. Southern colonies felt slavery was necessary for their economic survival. The issue came to a head during discussions on how the populations of the various states would be counted to determine representation in the newly formed House of Representatives. Convention delegates opposed to slavery (generally from the North) wanted to count only the free inhabitants of each state. Southern delegates wanted every slave counted. Why? Because the higher population numbers would give them more members in the House.

A compromise was reached. For the purpose of congressional apportionment, Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the new Constitution provided that the state populations would be determined by the number of free persons in each state and adding “three fifths of all other persons.” In other words, for every 100 slaves in the state, 60 people would be added to its population count. Indentured slaves were counted as free persons and “Indians not taxed” were left out of the tally entirely. There was NO mention of race and NO suggestion that anyone counted as three-fifths of a human being. There were, by the way, black slave owners who were counted and white slaves who were not. But let’s not cause too much stress for delicate minds...

SOURCE

____________________

WHY would Non-slave States capitulate in giving Southern States MORE power in the electorate by counting people whom were NOT free by BODY COUNT? Free to Vote? Have Freedom of their own accord?

Especially when we were a YOUNG country and had just WON our independence from a CROWN that practiced Slavery, and did NOT accord slaves freedom but to acheive political goals?

We fought for FREEDOM...were the SLAVES free to vote at that time?

*NO* they were not.

AS the Constitution was worded for apportionment of Electors?

WHY give States that held SLAVES that were denied FREEDOM more of a say?

*LOGIC* The 3/5ths agreemmnet settled the deal...and was later carried to it's fruition in the CIVIL WAR.

Its somewhat valid.. That 3/5ths thing was waaaaay before the Civil War...

That was a colonial thing.

I don't want to get into that now because its irrelevant.

It's as relevant TODAY as it was then. Don't delude yerself. PAY attention.

Whom is only worth 3/5ths of a person today???

 

[The T]

Its somewhat valid.. That 3/5ths thing was waaaaay before the Civil War...

That was a colonial thing.

I don't want to get into that now because its irrelevant.

It's as relevant TODAY as it was then. Don't delude yerself. PAY attention.

Whom is only worth 3/5ths of a person today???

NO *AMERICAN* By Birth...or those that come here LEGALLY that aspire to LIVE the DREAM oft disregarded by the locals that refuse to KNOW what they were BORN into...

Enough of an answer for you?

 

[Mr.Nick]

It's as relevant TODAY as it was then. Don't delude yerself. PAY attention.

Whom is only worth 3/5ths of a person today???

NO *AMERICAN* By Birth...or those that come here LEGALLY that aspire to LIVE the DREAM oft disregarded by the locals that refuse to KNOW what they were BORN into...

Enough of an answer for you?

You fucking serious?

You cant be exploited if you have a choice...

 

[The T]

Whom is only worth 3/5ths of a person today???

NO *AMERICAN* By Birth...or those that come here LEGALLY that aspire to LIVE the DREAM oft disregarded by the locals that refuse to KNOW what they were BORN into...

Enough of an answer for you?

You fucking serious?

You cant be exploited if you have a choice...

Then WHY do so many *AMERICANS* choose to by those that they vote for with NO THOUGHT?

 

[The T]

NO *AMERICAN* By Birth...or those that come here LEGALLY that aspire to LIVE the DREAM oft disregarded by the locals that refuse to KNOW what they were BORN into...

Enough of an answer for you?

You fucking serious?

You cant be exploited if you have a choice...

Then WHY do so many *AMERICANS* choose to by those that they vote for with NO THOUGHT?

or is it *THIS*??

*DISCLAIMER*

Here I go again...'CULT OF PERSONALITY'

DEAL with it...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0]YouTube - Living Colour - Cult Of Personality[/ame]

 

[Mr.Nick]

NO *AMERICAN* By Birth...or those that come here LEGALLY that aspire to LIVE the DREAM oft disregarded by the locals that refuse to KNOW what they were BORN into...

Enough of an answer for you?

You fucking serious?

You cant be exploited if you have a choice...

Then WHY do so many *AMERICANS* choose to by those that they vote for with NO THOUGHT?

Being an idiot is the idiots problem....