Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm reading a great biography of Hitler. He too, felt that the solution was racial separation.
what is this "racialist" thing? is that a new way for racists to complain about being called what they are?
just wondering.
I'm reading a great biography of Hitler. He too, felt that the solution was racial separation.
Pssst... you're going to have to do better than Argumentum Ad Hitlerum if you're going to debate me.
"You start out in 1954 by saying, ******, ******, ******. By 1968 you cant say ****** that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states rights and all that stuff. Youre getting so abstract now youre talking about cutting taxes, and all these things youre talking about are totally economic things and a by-product of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. Im not saying that. But Im saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me because obviously sitting around saying, We want to cut this, is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ******, ******. Lee Atwater, Republican strategist, 1981, describing the Southern Strategy
If we lived in a society in which there was no racism would we need to talk about it?
If we lived in a society in which there was no religion would we still talk about it?
If we lived in a society in which there was no class structure would we need to think about it?
If we lived in a society in which opportunity was level and fair would we think about it?
If we lived in a society in which your race, color, religion, class, didn't matter - we'd be in heaven if such a place exists.
I would propose unless we live in heaven we'll always think of these things because they are simply the way people are tuned. Consider that 300 years of racism is equivalent to one spoiled white boy not getting into the college of their choice one year and you realize humanity is a childish thinker.
On one side of our moral equivalency scale are slavery, broken families, lack of opportunity, discrimination, prison time for petty crime, on the other side is the white majority who have always been first, and still are, and somehow the scale is uneven, but it is not uneven in the way a moral universe would run, it is uneven because white power sees it as uneven. Opportunity is only white, connections are only white.
Is it any wonder many Black men want to be on the white side of this scale and so they join in the chorus that weighs the scale in that immoral way, because after all 300 and one are balanced on this particular scale of justice. Think Justice Thomas, Congressman West.
White affirmative action. Amazon.com: When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America (9780393328516): Ira Katznelson: Books
"We are all racist black, white, yellow and those of indeterminate colour accept it. Accept it as a fact. An innate biological response to people who are different. And having accepted it. Then get on with assessing your reactions, reassessing them and adopting modified behaviour it is not natural to love thy neighbour but it can become second nature you just gotta work at it. However if we blithely maintain our perfections and pay lip service to equality then the games a bogey and therell be fighting in the play-ground forever more." From McPherson's Rant
Google this if you want to learn: tim wise on white privilege
GRITtv: Tim Wise: Race and the Social Safety Net - YouTube
Now, Middy...I know you like to write almost as much as I do, but there is a single, simple question at hand:
ChrisCoates testified to the Civil Rights Commission that many of the lawyers in the Voting Section were opposed to bringing any civil rights cased against blacks in Mississippi until such time as blacks in the state achieved socioeconomic parity with whites. This is an essential question that must be answered: is this a fair outlook in the United States today, or is it a corruption of the voting rights law? Pajamas Media » Bombshell: Defying DOJ Instructions, Christopher Coates Will Testify Friday on New Black Panther Case
"This is an essential question that must be answered: is this a fair outlook in the United States today, or is it a corruption of the voting rights law? "
Only against whites? Ignore infractions committed by blacks? Yes or no?
If you say "no," we're on the same page.
I'm reading a great biography of Hitler. He too, felt that the solution was racial separation.
Pssst... you're going to have to do better than Argumentum Ad Hitlerum if you're going to debate me.
You can evoke Godwin's Law all you like. It won't help you. There's nothing to debate. Your ideology has been thrown on the ash heap of history.
It's "invoke", not evoke.
In any event, racial separatism isn't an "ideology", it's a state of nature. RACE-MIXING is an ideology. A deadly one, at that.
As for ash heap of history? Let's just say there's a phoenix arising from Israel... heh.
what is this "racialist" thing? is that a new way for racists to complain about being called what they are?
just wondering.