Doesn't it seem like Obama and Romney are playing for the same team?

[4Horsemen]

The way the cards are stacked, other parties have no place to show themselves.

but don't you think Obama and Romney are using the same playbook?

 

[there4eyeM]

The way the cards are stacked, other parties have no place to show themselves.

but don't you think Obama and Romney are using the same playbook?

They are in the same club.

 

[GeoLaureate8]

Romney and Obama are both funded by Goldman Sachs. Both Romney and Obama are Bilderberg supported. They have different rhetoric about gay marriage, abortion, and entitlements. Thats it. They both like war, spending, and debt.

 

[MisterBeale]

If they're playing for the same team, y'all shouldn't have any trouble voting for Obama...right?

they shouldn't.

I'm writing in Ron Paul so I could care less.

You need to research a little bit more. You are wise, but not that wise sensai. Start with an investigation of the Volker fund. Usury is still immoral. Cornering the gold market in an attempt to control global finance is still a sinister agenda, and like the false Hegelian dialectic between the capitalists and communists or the liberals and the conservatives, another dialectic, an alternative one between the Keynesians and the Austrians is in play here.


Ron Paul’s Benefactor, Peter Thiel, on Bilderberg Steering Committee

May 30, 2012 by Keith Gardner

According to Politico, Peter Thiel has donated $2.6M to Ron Paul’s super PAC and has also donated $125K to Bilderberg. Not only is Peter Thiel a major contributor of Bilderberg, Peter Thiel is also elected to the steering committee of Bilderberg, according to official Bilderberg documentation. Bilderberg seems to own all the horses in the race, including Ron Paul.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s funding of Ludwig von Mises and Bilderberg’s funding of Ron Paul serves a purpose for the Rockefellers and the Bilderberg Group. The Austrian School of Economics and Ron Paul function as truth blockers, preventing libertarians from understanding the principle forms by which aristocrats plunder and enslave the toiling masses through the state-granted privileges of collecting land rents and collecting usury upon the money supply. Ron Paul and the Austrian School of Economics misdirects people into a false paradigm, disguising the fuedalism of classical conservatism with a thin layer of classical liberalism.

http://libertyrevival.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/ron-pauls-benefactor-peter-thiel-on-bilderberg-steering-committee/

If you look into Paul's portfolio holdings, you will see much of it is invested into gold. There are personal interests there, much as there are with the international bankers and their future designs on an international currency. Does it matter who wins? No, the greenback is doomed, he knows it, as does the banking cabal. The elites are set with their investments in precious metals, and anyone else who is paying attention. And were Paul and his minions to win, their system of credit would be good for the nation, perhaps, but especially good for those who are already holding all the chips.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4C3HMQmnyw]WWIII Is Coming Soon & Here's Why! - YouTube[/ame]

Are they on the same side? Oh yes. If Obama is successful at "pushing" the Syrian regime, then yes, Obama will win the election. If he is not, then Romney will be elected and it will lead to hot war. The Democratic administration is to be used by the Anglo-American covert intelligence establishment to achieve their goals, as Obama is one of their assets. So is the Salafi movement. If the Syria regime cannot be pushed over soon, expect Romney to be put into power and a hot war initiated soon after to achieve the elites' goals. Don't think for a moment that "voting" by the population has anything to do with who will be the next POTUS. Unless of course. . . people wake up and realize they are being yanked around and refuse a war. If everyone voted for Romney and then refused to go to war? Who knows. . . But only non-commissioned officers and enlisted men could do that.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/clean-debate-zone/249922-world-war-iii.html

 

[Moonglow]

Yes, I agree. You can see a movement in the investment area that indicates a change in the future for the ones in power.

 

[paulitician]

In the end, both Romney & Obama are Big Government Globalists. Their differences are slight. But Romney gets the edge because he is clearly much more knowledgeable on Business & Economic matters. And that's probably enough for him to win it. It's more of that old Socialism vs. Socialism Light dilemma. Romney is by no means a real Conservative. But he leans more that way than Obama does. It is what it is.

 

[Dot Com]

The way the cards are stacked, other parties have no place to show themselves.

ESPECIALLY in the debates. There's a good reason why the League of Women Voters abandoned hosting the debates.

 

[Murf76]

Good grief.

 

[Dissent]

Obamney! Yes they are the same when it comes down to things that matter.

 

[paulitician]

Obamney! Yes they are the same when it comes down to things that matter.

Yes, this Two Party-Rule system is really a One Party-Rule system. They agree on much more than they disagree on. They are very good at distracting the sheeple with trivial absurdities like 'Big Bird' though. When it comes down to awful injustices like the NDAA, they're on the same page for sure. But hey, it's all about Big Bird. What do the sheep know?

 

[4Horsemen]

Romney and Obama are both funded by Goldman Sachs. Both Romney and Obama are Bilderberg supported. They have different rhetoric about gay marriage, abortion, and entitlements. Thats it. They both like war, spending, and debt.

took the words right outta my mouth.

 

[4Horsemen]

If they're playing for the same team, y'all shouldn't have any trouble voting for Obama...right?

they shouldn't.

I'm writing in Ron Paul so I could care less.

You need to research a little bit more. You are wise, but not that wise sensai. Start with an investigation of the Volker fund. Usury is still immoral. Cornering the gold market in an attempt to control global finance is still a sinister agenda, and like the false Hegelian dialectic between the capitalists and communists or the liberals and the conservatives, another dialectic, an alternative one between the Keynesians and the Austrians is in play here.


Ron Paul’s Benefactor, Peter Thiel, on Bilderberg Steering Committee

May 30, 2012 by Keith Gardner

According to Politico, Peter Thiel has donated $2.6M to Ron Paul’s super PAC and has also donated $125K to Bilderberg. Not only is Peter Thiel a major contributor of Bilderberg, Peter Thiel is also elected to the steering committee of Bilderberg, according to official Bilderberg documentation. Bilderberg seems to own all the horses in the race, including Ron Paul.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s funding of Ludwig von Mises and Bilderberg’s funding of Ron Paul serves a purpose for the Rockefellers and the Bilderberg Group. The Austrian School of Economics and Ron Paul function as truth blockers, preventing libertarians from understanding the principle forms by which aristocrats plunder and enslave the toiling masses through the state-granted privileges of collecting land rents and collecting usury upon the money supply. Ron Paul and the Austrian School of Economics misdirects people into a false paradigm, disguising the fuedalism of classical conservatism with a thin layer of classical liberalism.

http://libertyrevival.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/ron-pauls-benefactor-peter-thiel-on-bilderberg-steering-committee/

If you look into Paul's portfolio holdings, you will see much of it is invested into gold. There are personal interests there, much as there are with the international bankers and their future designs on an international currency. Does it matter who wins? No, the greenback is doomed, he knows it, as does the banking cabal. The elites are set with their investments in precious metals, and anyone else who is paying attention. And were Paul and his minions to win, their system of credit would be good for the nation, perhaps, but especially good for those who are already holding all the chips.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4C3HMQmnyw]WWIII Is Coming Soon & Here's Why! - YouTube[/ame]

Are they on the same side? Oh yes. If Obama is successful at "pushing" the Syrian regime, then yes, Obama will win the election. If he is not, then Romney will be elected and it will lead to hot war. The Democratic administration is to be used by the Anglo-American covert intelligence establishment to achieve their goals, as Obama is one of their assets. So is the Salafi movement. If the Syria regime cannot be pushed over soon, expect Romney to be put into power and a hot war initiated soon after to achieve the elites' goals. Don't think for a moment that "voting" by the population has anything to do with who will be the next POTUS. Unless of course. . . people wake up and realize they are being yanked around and refuse a war. If everyone voted for Romney and then refused to go to war? Who knows. . . But only non-commissioned officers and enlisted men could do that.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/clean-debate-zone/249922-world-war-iii.html

I understand all of that. which is why I'm voting for Ron Paul .because in the end, our vote is useless so why not just pick a candidate and throw a dart. ??

 

[paulitician]

Romney and Obama are both funded by Goldman Sachs. Both Romney and Obama are Bilderberg supported. They have different rhetoric about gay marriage, abortion, and entitlements. Thats it. They both like war, spending, and debt.

took the words right outta my mouth.

Yes, but they differ on incredibly important issues like Big Bird. And that's all that matters. No but seriously, both are NWO Global Elite-supported puppets. They work for the same bosses. Just two Harvard boys having a good laugh at our expense.

 

[kwc57]

If they're playing for the same team, y'all shouldn't have any trouble voting for Obama...right?

they shouldn't.

I'm writing in Ron Paul so I could care less.

Obama appreciates your support!

 

[4Horsemen]

Romney and Obama are both funded by Goldman Sachs. Both Romney and Obama are Bilderberg supported. They have different rhetoric about gay marriage, abortion, and entitlements. Thats it. They both like war, spending, and debt.

took the words right outta my mouth.

Yes, but they differ on incredibly important issues like Big Bird. And that's all that matters. No but seriously, both are NWO Global Elite-supported puppets. They work for the same bosses. Just two Harvard boys having a good laugh at our expense.

Glad you have a sense of humor about this and you are 100% correct.

It's a Pep Rally on TV

 

[4Horsemen]

If they're playing for the same team, y'all shouldn't have any trouble voting for Obama...right?

they shouldn't.

I'm writing in Ron Paul so I could care less.

Obama appreciates your support!

You can have my Obamaphone, I got a Galaxy S II now.

 

[MisterBeale]

Obamney! Yes they are the same when it comes down to things that matter.

Don't you mean "Robamney," Choice of the elites?

 

[MisterBeale]

I understand all of that. which is why I'm voting for Ron Paul .because in the end, our vote is useless so why not just pick a candidate and throw a dart. ??

The major reason not to vote when the system is corrupt, and when you know it is corrupt, it legitimizes the rule of those who lord over the people.

Does this mean I am entirely opposed to representative republican institutionalized government? Not necessarily. If elections were fair, if all political advertising was strictly informational, and restricted to public funding, if all candidates running had a voice at publicly televised debates, if the electoral system for choosing those to represent us were abolished, etc., than maybe representational republican government may work as it once did, and as the founders intended. Until then, this system is a sham. Why else do you think the elites don't allow UN observers in. When we vote, as citizens, we are saying that we endorse this system, and if our candidate wins or loses, we still accept the legitimacy and right of those who win to rule over us. What. . . wait? Really?!!

Fuck no. I'm not voting. I don't accept that. I will not participate in a system I know will just lead to more human rights abuses. It will lead to more war abroad, and the stripping of more civil rights and liberties at home. Sure, I can say the guy I voted for didn't win, but by voting, I recognize the system as legitimate. It isn't, it doesn't have my blessing to carry on as it does. I am heartened to see the explosing of the Black Market, the selling of home made wares, food, consumer durables, the trade of labor, anything that is tax free as this system becomes more and more corrupt. People are waking up and saying, NO MORE. If less than 50% of the electorate voted, than when D.C. goes to war, who is really going to war, the American people, or corporate America, the MSM, the CFR, and the elites? It's not our government anymore, it's theirs. That is why there is as much propaganda to get people to vote as there is propaganda to have people to chose either the Coke or Pepsi candidate. Because if people don't support the corruption of the government, then when it goes to war the rest of the world will know, it isn't the American people going to war, it is their corrupt slave masters.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk]George Carlin Doesn't vote - YouTube[/ame]​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/6020204-post8.html

I ignore presidential polls that track only two candidates. You know that's when a particular polling organization is in the tank and corrupt, when they don't give you any other options. 43% of the electorate, would rather vote for anybody else, or nobody else, then participate. Really. For our MSM, it's all one big effort in mind control. Reading posts on this site, it's interesting to see who reads the most, and who gets their information from the TV and radio the most. lol Likewise who ego-identifies with party/candidates.

 

[Charles_Main]

I would hope they are playing for the same Team.

The American Team.

 

[Bigfoot]

I would like to see John Bolton as Secretary of State which is another good reason to vote Romney.