Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
A Blue Book Question in a survey course on Western Civilization, usually taken by Freshman:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does the end make liberals cry like little bitches?
That's impossible to determine without knowing either the means or the results.A Blue Book Question in a survey course on Western Civilization, usually taken by Freshman:
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
The policy was supposed to be a ‘deterrent’ to immigration, and it has had no such effect.
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
The policy was supposed to be a ‘deterrent’ to immigration, and it has had no such effect.
Using children in this matter is abusive and immoral; for the fiscal conservative, a huge cost of taxpayer money with no cost-benefit.
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
The policy was supposed to be a ‘deterrent’ to immigration, and it has had no such effect.
The question is based on the morality of the Means. If the means are immoral, the end cannot be justified
As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.
The policy was supposed to be a ‘deterrent’ to immigration, and it has had no such effect.
Using children in this matter is abusive and immoral; for the fiscal conservative, a huge cost of taxpayer money with no cost-benefit.
What is your solution to morally and inexpensively cut off the flow of illegal aliens and their children across our border?
As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.
In this case, the failed, unwarranted Trump policy of separating children from their families hasn’t worked, given the fact there has been no decrease in the number of immigrants coming to the United States.
The policy was supposed to be a ‘deterrent’ to immigration, and it has had no such effect.
Using children in this matter is abusive and immoral; for the fiscal conservative, a huge cost of taxpayer money with no cost-benefit.
What is your solution to morally and inexpensively cut off the flow of illegal aliens and their children across our border?
I have no magic solution to mitigate what Trump, Sessions and Nielsen have done, since Trump has alienated Mexico, slandered the Mexican and Central American governments and people, other than to vote my conscience and hope other people have one. Clearly you don't.
We need an effective and fully funded Dept of State, to fix diplomatically what Trump has destroyed. A Congress to function within the traditional values of our nation, and not those of a banana republic or worse, and a W. H. functioning with no drama and no chaos, but with a consistent goal of establishing win-win solutions.
As pointed out, the question was asked in a survey course in world history, and most would understand the Ends and Means are those designed by Kings, Tsars, Generals, etc., and within the scope of this thread, the Press Conference with the Sec. of Homeland Security today.
Is the Means, taking baby's and young children from the arms of their parents, justified. And, what are Ends, i.e. not only the agenda of Trump, Sessions and Nielsen, but the impact on these innocent children and on the perception of the people all over the world of America.