C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
And rape or incest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
Really? A woman who becomes pregnant due to rape or incest can't make a decision to abort for five months?Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
And rape or incest.
You should read the bill.Well, then I guess the woman should make a decision to abort BEFORE 20 weeks.
Oh, the burden!
Much of what he bolded has nothing to do with 20 weeks, and everything to do with making it as difficult as possible for an abortion to happen. Ever.
This bill pertains to abortions AFTER 20 weeks.
Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
OK. That certainly is possible.You should read the bill.Much of what he bolded has nothing to do with 20 weeks, and everything to do with making it as difficult as possible for an abortion to happen. Ever.
This bill pertains to abortions AFTER 20 weeks.
Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
I've already read the bill twice. Obviously we are having a difference in perception.
OK. That certainly is possible.You should read the bill.
This bill pertains to abortions AFTER 20 weeks.
Frankly, I think the only thing the bill needed to say was NO abortions after 20 weeks except in the event that the mother's life is in danger.
I've already read the bill twice. Obviously we are having a difference in perception.
What parts of the bill apply to abortions before 20 weeks? (Other than requiring the venues for the procedure to be in line with other medical day procedure facilities.)
Well, as I said in another thread, I have zero issues with venues where medical day procedures are performed being required to be in line with other venues doing medical prcedures.OK. That certainly is possible.I've already read the bill twice. Obviously we are having a difference in perception.
What parts of the bill apply to abortions before 20 weeks? (Other than requiring the venues for the procedure to be in line with other medical day procedure facilities.)
That right there is huge. That right there is enough to prevent many clinics from continuing operations.
I mean look at South Dakota.