Sure looks like they want this stuff kept hidden.
I thought he was saving the country from the commies. They should be proud of it.
I thought he was saving the country from the commies. They should be proud of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a moot point since it's already well established that executive privilege can't be used to hide evidence of a crime.
It's a moot point since it's already well established that executive privilege can't be used to hide evidence of a crime.
A former president has the right to continued executive privilege to communications/document that were created/made while he was president.
Trump wants call logs, aide's notes hidden from Jan. 6 panel
ZEKE MILLER
Sat, October 30, 2021, 4:07 AM
Former President Donald Trump is trying to block documents including call logs, drafts of remarks and speeches and handwritten notes from his chief of staff relating to the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection from being released to the committee investigating the riot, the National Archives revealed in a court filing early Saturday.
Trump has sued to prevent the National Archives from transmitting those documents, and thousands more, to the House committee investigating the attack. President Joe Biden declined to assert executive privilege on most of Trump's records after determining that doing so is “not in the best interests of the United States.”
It seems former President Trump seeks to use this privilege to cover up the events before, during and after the events on Jan 6th, 2021.
Hold on here my2cents because it’s good to keep ALL individuals responsible for their own actions, at least that’s the playbook most follow. I might be reading you wrong so I apologize if that’s the case. Are you saying that Trump was responsible for the loyalty of his white house staff and bodyguards? Now, if you’re saying that some Secret Service staff did feel personally connected to Trump above the country, evidence is needed to support that claim. I am not claiming that it’s not possible for a person to develop a strong loyalty to a president. I am sure that’s happened with many administrations.Throughout his presidency Trump had problem with many who served at the pleasure of the president. The problem was most profound with those that understood their service was to be directed to their employer, the American government. Trump's current stance suffers from the same delusion that these folks were his personal servants.
Is there a lucid response in that empty alt-right brain of yours Captain Cherry Picker?Wow….how do you dress and feed yourself being as stupid as you are?
Does a former President have the right of Executive Privilege?
Looks like
Probably with
cross your fingers
hope as hard as you'd like.
Then there should be no issue with giving the documents to the committee.The fact is that they don't have a smoking gun to connect the dots.
They are looking for a smoking gun. Again, a person has to prove he's innocent
with these people.
It's as good as an admission of guilt by Trump.
First of all you have to have evidence that a "crime" has occurred, Crep! Since the FBI investigated this and found no evidence that the Trump White House was involved in a plot to break into Congress or incite a riot...what "crime" is it that you want executive privilege waived for? You don't get to waive that to go looking for a crime...that's not the way it works!It's a moot point since it's already well established that executive privilege can't be used to hide evidence of a crime.
Bullshit, it doesn't work like that. A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Then there should be no issue with giving the documents to the committee.
End of story.
Then there should be no issue with giving the documents to the committee.
Bullshit, it doesn't work like that. A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Not the other way around. Seems your ilk is trying to find a crime where they have no evidence.
Where did you go wrong, Jack?
Warning of bad behaviour that I will not tolerate.Guilt of what, moron?
Democrats should invest in boat companies because they sure do go on a lot of fishing expeditions. "We don't have any proof of anything illegal but if we look and dig enough we're certainly we will find it."
Final warning!Doesn't work that way you fucking liberals.
Warning of bad behaviour that I will not tolerate.
Evidence of the alleged criminal behaviour by Trump.
Final warning!
WTF? Evidence of what? ALLEDGED CRIMINAL BEHAVOR????Warning of bad behaviour that I will not tolerate.
Evidence of the alleged criminal behaviour by Trump.
Final warning!
the purpose of an investigation is to gather evidence.Bullshit, it doesn't work like that. A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Not the other way around. Seems your ilk is trying to find a crime where they have no evidence.
Where did you go wrong, Jack?