thereisnospoon
Gold Member
Oy vey!if we left things up to state blacks would still have not equal rights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oy vey!if we left things up to state blacks would still have not equal rights.
Look, we understand your position. You're not running for office and you're certainly not trying going ot convince everyone into agreeing with you. So again, once is enough.Standing in the middle of the room and repeatedly screaming your point of view does not make it a stronger one.
Once is enough.
Now, if there's nothing else you have to add, bugger off!
No, too many in the past have done so with tragic results.
We get it.
Because there is a point at which an open mind starts spilling all over the place. It is not a pretty sight.How can any sane American object to two adult humans marrying?
<blinking and blinking>
to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership ?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership ?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
It's perfectly fine with me if someone wishes to marry a farm animal. The only requirement being the animal must not be visibly unhappy with the arrangement.to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership ?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
Because there is a point at which an open mind starts spilling all over the place. It is not a pretty sight.How can any sane American object to two adult humans marrying?
<blinking and blinking>
Uh, "freedom", try this for size:
"Marriage is an institution called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape.
How can any sane American object to two adult humans marrying?
The word itself has deep religious meaning to many and that meaning includes the understanding that it involves one man and one woman.
I would hope that any law with the intent of equality for those currently excluded from this legal condition holds this sensibility and uses a different term to award the legal advantages of this arrangement to the communities who desire it.
Are you against gay sex. Allow them to marry and the sex will end.
It's perfectly fine with me if someone wishes to marry a farm animal. The only requirement being the animal must not be visibly unhappy with the arrangement.to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership ?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
Why should anyone be concerned about who (or what) other people wish to marry? As long as no harm is being done it's nobody's business.
Because there is a point at which an open mind starts spilling all over the place. It is not a pretty sight.
<blinking and blinking>
Uh, "freedom", try this for size:
"Marriage is an institution called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape.
That's bad form, and a terrible example of one who supports gay marriage.
Uh, "freedom", try this for size:
"Marriage is an institution called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape.
That's bad form, and a terrible example of one who supports gay marriage.
Quote from the Third Reich.
That's bad form, and a terrible example of one who supports gay marriage.
Quote from the Third Reich.
Not relevant in the debate today though. It's just playing the Hitler card.
That should be the criteria for denying any freedom of choice; will it do harm to society? We should not deny freedom of choice based on what we believe, but rather what we know. Incest leads to a high probability of congenital birth defects. Bestiality is non-consensual sex and is considered inhumane treatment of animals. But to deny a freedom of choice, because religious beliefs, fears, or hatred is just plain wrong.It's perfectly fine with me if someone wishes to marry a farm animal. The only requirement being the animal must not be visibly unhappy with the arrangement.to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership ?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
Why should anyone be concerned about who (or what) other people wish to marry? As long as no harm is being done it's nobody's business.
There is no ‘substitute’ for marriage, either one is married or he is not. If the state contrives some contractual entity with the exact-same provisions as marriage, then it is marriage, whatever the state might call it.
But the state may not play a semantic shell game, and attempt to appease same-sex couples with a cheap imitation of marriage law, a ‘separate but equal’ approach is as illegal as the denial of access to marriage law itself.
How can any sane American object to two adult humans marrying?
How can any sane American object to two adult humans marrying?
Well, the Big Book of Myths and Fairytales says it's bad so it must be bad.
It's perfectly fine with me if someone wishes to marry a farm animal. The only requirement being the animal must not be visibly unhappy with the arrangement.to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership…?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
Why should anyone be concerned about who (or what) other people wish to marry? As long as no harm is being done it's nobody's business.
to form a legally-recognized domestic partnership…?
simple poll... yeah or nay...
comments welcomed...
I voted no, Bill and I support same sex marriage. My explanation for that is there are some instances where I would not support a marriage between two people. Those would include incestuous relationships, a marriage involving a minor or a marriage that would constitute bigamy.
As with so many polls...there is no black and white answer...but shades of gray as well depending on the circumstances. Because you gave me only two choices and worded your poll as you did...you forced me into choosing something that doesn't represent my feelings on the subject well at all.