Well the "to the people" clause was added after the fact but yes that is what I am referring to more or less. My point is that the Constitution was about limiting the Federal Government and laying out precisely what it was allowed to do. I see how you could view this the other way though by saying it lays out what the State's can't do and restricts the states by (sorta)specifically saying what the Fed can.
This wasn't meant to be a debate on the Constitution though. It is a general and vague question on how people would feel about the State being the main governing force on almost every topic.
Oh, in that case a resounding NO.