Discussion in 'Politics' started by manifold, Jun 25, 2010.
Just curious. For the extremos, any restrictions on a woman's right to choose are anti liberal.
seems conservatives are confused.....you can abort for some reasons but not other reasons....
so the fetus is responsible for the sins of the father...ie. rape, molestation...
why do people who believe in god and trust in god...suddenly have to abort a fetus that is a threat to the mother's health...should you not leave that up to your god?
Does that mean it's a crazy question because the answer is obviously yes or obviously no?
While not a liberal, I support a woman's choice to do whatever she deems necessary to her own body.
Gosh, I don't know why liberals wouldn't support it.
After all, what's wrong with breeching the baby so it's little legs come out first so only the head remains inside mommy, poking a hole in its skull with a scissors or something, and then sucking its little brains out? Oh, okay, maybe its little arms and legs kick and twitch a bit while the hole gets poked and as its brains start to disappear, but it's all over rather quickly. And the doctor doesn't feel a thing.
No, it means you are obsessed with other people's opinions.
Just asking a question.
Feel free not to answer it if you're ashamed of your opinion.
I don't believe in abortions after the first three months, unless it is for a medical reason. Is that clear enough for ya?
But really, why are you obsessed with this subject?
I wouldn't say they are supported. I would say that liberals support not making them illegal since they happen so rarely and circumstances that would lead to them in almost all cases would mean the mother has some serious mental issues or is being abused.
See how easy that was? Now why can't libertarians answer a simple question?
Separate names with a comma.