Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
which is as high as the rate ever got during the great republican depression ithat started in 1929. By comparison, the ue rate never got higher than 10% in the us during the great republican recession of 2008.
Now, now, now step. Only if you keep your head in the bat shit crazy con web sites (which you do) would you believe that either the great republican depression of 1929 or great republican recession of 2008 were anything but republican creations. Saying otherwise wakes you look like what you are: a partisan hack.which is as high as the rate ever got during the great republican depression ithat started in 1929. By comparison, the ue rate never got higher than 10% in the us during the great republican recession of 2008.
This is the type of shit that lets a sane person know who they are dealing with. Anyone that actually believes with any sincerity, that these depressions were the results of republicans, is a hyper-partisan hack.
So, Remedial, Dotcom, Krugman and Derp2three, you guys, and all of those just like you are peas in the same hack pod. If we're all lucky, you'll suffocate in your hyper=partisan, moronic, pod. Now that is hoping!
Actually, I do not so much blame one party entirely for causing recessions. I do, however, blame them for not stopping the recession before it is out of control. Thus, yes indeed, I do blame the repubs for the great depression as they watched the ue rate go from about 3% in early 1929 to over 23% by March of 1933. And I do have a problem with what went on in 2007 and 2008 and prior. And yup, that was primarily a repub recession. As economists in general agree. Sorry you are having kittens. I know how much you want to make it a dem problem.Again, any moron who insists that the US depressions in the last 100 years are due to either party in particular, is a hack. An ignorant hack that strips themselves of any economic debate merits for using hyper-partisan politics to try and explain a complex economic event.
That's why you're insane, and like a mushroom. You live in the dark and feed on shit.
By the way, do you know a sane person, dipshit???which is as high as the rate ever got during the great republican depression ithat started in 1929. By comparison, the ue rate never got higher than 10% in the us during the great republican recession of 2008.
This is the type of shit that lets a sane person know who they are dealing with. Anyone that actually believes with any sincerity, that these depressions were the results of republicans, is a hyper-partisan hack.
So, Remedial, Dotcom, Krugman and Derp2three, you guys, and all of those just like you are peas in the same hack pod. If we're all lucky, you'll suffocate in your hyper=partisan, moronic, pod. Now that is hoping!
Thus, yes indeed, I do blame the repubs for the great depression
Thus, yes indeed, I do blame the repubs for the great depression
of course thats 100% idiotic since Hoover was a liberal. Ever heard of Hoover Dam? Also, causes of depression were only discovered by Friedman decades later. The causes of course were liberal interference with the self correcting free market. Sorry to rock your world.
Thus, yes indeed, I do blame the repubs for the great depression
of course thats 100% idiotic since Hoover was a liberal. Ever heard of Hoover Dam? Also, causes of depression were only discovered by Friedman decades later. The causes of course were liberal interference with the self correcting free market. Sorry to rock your world.
Are you really going tp follow up a partisan hack with partisan shit? Mushrooms. They seem to be a plentiful group.
He says republicans caused it, you say liberals caused it. That's all bullshit, both parties are stuffed with Statists. THAT is the problem.
He says republicans caused it, you say liberals caused it. That's all bullshit, both parties are stuffed with Statists. THAT is the problem.
well Republicans are as freedom oriented as the voters will allow. Newt went too far with BBA's and govt shut downs and the voters rebelled. Now they do what they can. Cruz and paul give us great hope.
He says republicans caused it, you say liberals caused it. That's all bullshit, both parties are stuffed with Statists. THAT is the problem.
well Republicans are as freedom oriented as the voters will allow. Newt went too far with BBA's and govt shut downs and the voters rebelled. Now they do what they can. Cruz and paul give us great hope.
You're just like that which you claim to be wrong.
I have been reading some stuff mainly about Rothbard, which has got me to thinking. Is there any interest in a somewhat technical and nerdy discussion of the "Austrian School" and should it be here or in the CDZ? My first choice would be to put it here. What say you?
I have been reading some stuff mainly about Rothbard, which has got me to thinking. Is there any interest in a somewhat technical and nerdy discussion of the "Austrian School" and should it be here or in the CDZ? My first choice would be to put it here. What say you?
I'm a big fan of both Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises.
Fire away.
Speaking of IQ, ed thinks 100 is brilliant. And ed believes in combined IQ. Add that of Bribart and ed and you may get 100. Next.I have been reading some stuff mainly about Rothbard, which has got me to thinking. Is there any interest in a somewhat technical and nerdy discussion of the "Austrian School" and should it be here or in the CDZ? My first choice would be to put it here. What say you?
I'm a big fan of both Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises.
Fire away.
oldfart lacks the IQ to debate ideology. when he says technical and nerdy he means it.
Speaking of IQ, ed thinks 100 is brilliant. And ed believes in combined IQ. Add that of Bribart and ed and you may get 100. Next.I'm a big fan of both Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises.
Fire away.
oldfart lacks the IQ to debate ideology. when he says technical and nerdy he means it.
