This one has my crystal ball torn between a good and a bad decision:
On the negative side the Nifty Nine will come down on the side of the United Nations. In short: The entire issue is about the United Nations dictating this country’s immigration policy. Upholding President Trump travel ban flies in the face of United Nations authority.
NOTE: Four and a half justices already serve the United Nations. Justice Kennedy is the half. I fear that in the case of knocking down Trump’s executive order half makes five:
Clerks & Presidents
On the plus side five out of nine could rule that only AMERICANS are protected by the Rights in the Constitution. Imagine what a ruling like that would do to the terrorists, illegal alien criminals, and parasite refugees the United Nations dumps in all of our courts. Considering the decisions the SCOTUS handed down in recent decades I do not see an AMERICANS ONLY ruling in the cards, but it does open up all sorts of possibilities.
p.s. Justice Kennedy got the seat that Judge Bork should have filled. I find it interesting that Kennedy is the exact opposite of this:
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Supreme Court took the rare step on Friday of expediting consideration of a major case, rapidly accelerating the schedule for reviewing the Fourth Circuit’s blocking of President Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order.
Supreme Court Expedites Trump’s Petition on Executive Order Case
by Ken Klukowski
3 Jun 2017
Supreme Court Expedites Trump’s Petition on Executive Order Case - Breitbart
by Ken Klukowski
3 Jun 2017
Supreme Court Expedites Trump’s Petition on Executive Order Case - Breitbart
On the negative side the Nifty Nine will come down on the side of the United Nations. In short: The entire issue is about the United Nations dictating this country’s immigration policy. Upholding President Trump travel ban flies in the face of United Nations authority.
NOTE: Four and a half justices already serve the United Nations. Justice Kennedy is the half. I fear that in the case of knocking down Trump’s executive order half makes five:
If Kennedy is a swing vote he always swings towards international law.
Ginsburg has no use for the US Constitution she rules on:
Ginsburg has no use for the US Constitution she rules on:
Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg teach international law in Salzburg, Austria. What are the odds they will vote to uphold a un-ratified United Nations Treaty as well as vote to legitimate a United Nations Tribunal?
Kagan and Sotomayor are in the sewer rat’s pocket. So how would you like to see Justice Breyer the swing vote defending the US Constitution!
Kagan and Sotomayor are in the sewer rat’s pocket. So how would you like to see Justice Breyer the swing vote defending the US Constitution!
Clerks & Presidents
On the plus side five out of nine could rule that only AMERICANS are protected by the Rights in the Constitution. Imagine what a ruling like that would do to the terrorists, illegal alien criminals, and parasite refugees the United Nations dumps in all of our courts. Considering the decisions the SCOTUS handed down in recent decades I do not see an AMERICANS ONLY ruling in the cards, but it does open up all sorts of possibilities.
p.s. Justice Kennedy got the seat that Judge Bork should have filled. I find it interesting that Kennedy is the exact opposite of this:
International law is not law but politics, ... there is no such law, and the pretense that it exists is a harmful fantasy. Robert Bork