Charles_Main
AR15 Owner
The problem here is that the Supreme Court issue the only decision in its history, to my knowledge, that they specifically said had no value as precedent. The reason for this was that they made a determination which superceded a state's highest court on an election law issue. Big no no. S. Ct never did that before. And I can guarantee it won't ever do that again.
Is that theft? Dunno. But I can tell you that Bush v Gore is an embarrassment as a decision.
Yeah, I was not defending the 2000 election, I was simply pointing out that in 04 Bush won by a larger majority than anyone in a long time, and still people cried foul. Also I was pointing out that Clinton never got even 50% of the vote yet many liberals seem totally unaware of this, or unwilling to admit it.