Desperate Dems Try to Smear Moore, But O.K. With This...

[Bush92]

The real sick thing about this entire thread is how you Looney liberals, don't see a problem. With a half naked boy dancing in the middle of the street. While adults are cheering him on. I'd say they are all pedophiles and people on here are defending them. Get this through your head, the boy is half fucking naked, you all are sick individuals. The boy should be playing with his friends and having fun, not dancing in the street while grown ups are getting their jollies off on him.

Um, okay, the only thing that is exposed are his head and arms. That's "half-naked" by you?

Look, you aren't upset about how much skin is exposed, you are upset he's wearing a dress.

He’s 8 you sick bastard!

 

[jknowgood]

The boy shouldn't be exposed to that sexual perversion period. Should a boy be forced to see this

Was that at the same parade? Or did you just check into your usual stash of Pride Parade Porn?

How is it homophobes always seem to have pictures like this?

How can liberals sit in judgement of Roy Moore when they support perversion of children at gay pride parades? Democrats have no morality.

The more perversion the better.

 

[Bush92]

The real sick thing about this entire thread is how you Looney liberals, don't see a problem. With a half naked boy dancing in the middle of the street. While adults are cheering him on. I'd say they are all pedophiles and people on here are defending them. Get this through your head, the boy is half fucking naked, you all are sick individuals. The boy should be playing with his friends and having fun, not dancing in the street while grown ups are getting their jollies off on him.

Sure and go to a conservative beauty contest for six year olds and see the sexual exploitation

So your fine with an 8 year old boy dancing in a provocative manner (obviously coached) in public at a parade full of perverts?

 

[Bush92]

The boy shouldn't be exposed to that sexual perversion period. Should a boy be forced to see this

Was that at the same parade? Or did you just check into your usual stash of Pride Parade Porn?

How is it homophobes always seem to have pictures like this?

How can liberals sit in judgement of Roy Moore when they support perversion of children at gay pride parades? Democrats have no morality.

The more perversion the better.

That’s what liberal want. Complete breakdown of social values.

 

[Bush92]

The real sick thing about this entire thread is how you Looney liberals, don't see a problem. With a half naked boy dancing in the middle of the street. While adults are cheering him on. I'd say they are all pedophiles and people on here are defending them. Get this through your head, the boy is half fucking naked, you all are sick individuals. The boy should be playing with his friends and having fun, not dancing in the street while grown ups are getting their jollies off on him.

Um, okay, the only thing that is exposed are his head and arms. That's "half-naked" by you?

Look, you aren't upset about how much skin is exposed, you are upset he's wearing a dress.

The boy shouldn't be exposed to that sexual perversion period. Should a boy be forced to see thisView attachment 159629

They voted for Obama and Hillary!

 

[jknowgood]

Anyone who thinks this is normal, well you're an idiot.

Wearing a pussy hat. Lol

 

[Bush92]

Anyone who thinks this is normal, well you're an idiot.View attachment 159659
Wearing a pussy hat. Lol

Says much about their mentality.

 

[Bush92]

Democrats: gay pride parades, gender change in children, abortions...absolutely immoral people.

 

[ptbw forever]

The real sick thing about this entire thread is how you Looney liberals, don't see a problem. With a half naked boy dancing in the middle of the street. While adults are cheering him on. I'd say they are all pedophiles and people on here are defending them. Get this through your head, the boy is half fucking naked, you all are sick individuals. The boy should be playing with his friends and having fun, not dancing in the street while grown ups are getting their jollies off on him.

Um, okay, the only thing that is exposed are his head and arms. That's "half-naked" by you?

Look, you aren't upset about how much skin is exposed, you are upset he's wearing a dress.

He’s 8 you sick bastard!

If the kid was black there would be thousands of black activists accusing the parade organizers of racism and pedophillia and claiming that the white power structure is feminizing black males, and all the shitstains defending this would be nodding their heads.

 

[AntonToo]

Democrats: gay pride parades, gender change in children, abortions...absolutely immoral people.

...so Moore molesting a girl is ok?

What is your moral argument exactly?

 

[Bush92]

Democrats: gay pride parades, gender change in children, abortions...absolutely immoral people.

...so Moore molesting a girl is ok?

What is your moral argument exactly?

That Democrats have no morality. So how can they criticize Moore? Conservatives can, and if allegations are true he should step aside. But for right now, they are allegations with the victims coming forward at this particular time...seems strange to me. But, liberals cannot pass moral judgement on anyone...they have forfeited that right because of their support for perversion.

 

[jknowgood]

The real sick thing about this entire thread is how you Looney liberals, don't see a problem. With a half naked boy dancing in the middle of the street. While adults are cheering him on. I'd say they are all pedophiles and people on here are defending them. Get this through your head, the boy is half fucking naked, you all are sick individuals. The boy should be playing with his friends and having fun, not dancing in the street while grown ups are getting their jollies off on him.

Um, okay, the only thing that is exposed are his head and arms. That's "half-naked" by you?

Look, you aren't upset about how much skin is exposed, you are upset he's wearing a dress.

He’s 8 you sick bastard!

If the kid was black there would be thousands of black activists accusing the parade organizers of racism and pedophillia and claiming that the white power structure is feminizing black males, and all the shitstains defending this would be nodding their heads.

I don't know liberals love them queers, I believe more than blacks. Heck the blacks are even less on their radar than the Hispanics. Liberals know they own the black vote so they don't care about them anymore. We just had a black president and they are worse off now than before he was elected.

 

[ptbw forever]

Democrats: gay pride parades, gender change in children, abortions...absolutely immoral people.

Gender change in WHITE children.

The non-white transgenders are entirely created by the culture spawned by mass brainwashing impressionable white children.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Bullshit. If what these women say is true, Moore should spend time behind bars. If not, then they should.

But to dismiss it out of hand, is tacit approval of it, if he did it.

And if you want to talk about desperate and sick, how about Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler and his comments?
He said, "Even if you accept the Washington Post’s report as being completely true, it’s much ado about very little. "
Thats right, a fellow republican thinks a sitting judge kissing and fondling a 14 year old girl is "...much ado about very little".

Of course, Zeigler didn't stop there.
“He’s clean as a hound’s tooth,” Ziegler claimed, before relying on Scripture to defend Moore.

“Take the Bible. Zachariah and Elizabeth for instance. Zachariah was extremely old to marry Elizabeth and they became the parents of John the Baptist,” Ziegler says choosing his words carefully before invoking Christ. “Also take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.”

“There’s just nothing immoral or illegal here,” Ziegler concluded. “Maybe just a little bit unusual.”

1. More was not a sitting judge at the time this was said to have happened.

2. The lying little whore has zero proof to support her accusations.

3. Why wait till it is most convenient for the Democrats to try to dry up funding for Moore among donors without him having any time to disprove the slander? Oh, wait, because it is all a pack of lies, and smear from the usual suspects who accuse the GOP of being KKK every election and of wanting to run down little minority children while flying a Confederate Battle Flag.

Seriously, if you think these charges have any merit at all you are an idiot.

Jim....did Moore have a penchant for very young girls when he was in his 30's?

Why does it matter whether Moore was a judge or a prosecutor or asst prosecutor or an intern to a judge or what ever??? Did he work at the courthouse?

The issue is whether he was 32 and she was 14...isn't it?

Why are you calling her a whore?

If we are going to go with unsubstantiated rumor.... It's not the Democrats doing this, it's McConnell from what I heard....

The woman is a REPUBLICAN and voted for Trump.

Lol, prove she voted for Trump, lol.

This woman is an obvious smear operative being played by the Dems and that makes her a whore.

Anyone that will lie for cash is a whore and a slanderer.

 

[AntonToo]

Democrats: gay pride parades, gender change in children, abortions...absolutely immoral people.

...so Moore molesting a girl is ok?

What is your moral argument exactly?

That Democrats have no morality. So how can they criticize Moore? Conservatives can, and if allegations are true he should step aside. But for right now, they are allegations with the victims coming forward at this particular time...seems strange to me. But, liberals cannot pass moral judgement on anyone...they have forfeited that right because of their support for perversion.

You say you have morality, yet have no reservations about Moore’s molesting that girl and are instead deflecting to rants about them pesky Democrats.

Doesn’t add up.

 

[ClosedCaption]

How does that justify what Creepy Moore did?

What did he do?

What did Weinstein or Spacy do?

Technically nothing until convicted, but Hollywood has known all about it for years, by admission.

And the Washington post quoted 30 different people to confirm Moore.

So The Washington Post has a conviction with evidence. Make me laugh again.

No, I said they quoted 30 different people.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Liberals are making false claims

Let the Alabama police sort it out, there's no statute of limitation on raping 14 y.o. in Alabama…

Moore is not accused of rape at all.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Bullshit. If what these women say is true, Moore should spend time behind bars. If not, then they should.

But to dismiss it out of hand, is tacit approval of it, if he did it.

And if you want to talk about desperate and sick, how about Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler and his comments?
He said, "Even if you accept the Washington Post’s report as being completely true, it’s much ado about very little. "
Thats right, a fellow republican thinks a sitting judge kissing and fondling a 14 year old girl is "...much ado about very little".

Of course, Zeigler didn't stop there.
“He’s clean as a hound’s tooth,” Ziegler claimed, before relying on Scripture to defend Moore.

“Take the Bible. Zachariah and Elizabeth for instance. Zachariah was extremely old to marry Elizabeth and they became the parents of John the Baptist,” Ziegler says choosing his words carefully before invoking Christ. “Also take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.”

“There’s just nothing immoral or illegal here,” Ziegler concluded. “Maybe just a little bit unusual.”

Moore is accused of no inappropriate conduct as a sitting judge.

 

[JoeB131]

How can liberals sit in judgement of Roy Moore when they support perversion of children at gay pride parades? Democrats have no morality.

Yawn, guy.... sorry, some kids are gay. You know which ones are going to grow up to be gay before they hit puberty.

 

[JoeB131]

Moore is accused of no inappropriate conduct as a sitting judge.

Which is relevent, how, exactly?

Keep in mind, you want to crucify Roman Polanski for what he did 40 years ago, but not what Moore did 40 years ago.