beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 45,071
- 16,766
- 2,250
. If the obstruction was created out of a bogus case where nothing could be proven in the original intent of the case, and the ones being accused were then set up in order to try and get anything on them, then the charge of obstruction fails because there was nothing to obstruct unless was proven otherwise. No cullusion, then no obstruction. Donald Trump fired Comey not to obstruct justice in an investigation, because the case against the Trump team hasn't been proven, and won't be proven because it was all a conspiracy theory conjured up by the butt hurt libs who wanted Hillary in that office at all cost.If that is true.....then per Comey, no one should ever be prosecuted for that.....or at least that was the thinking for not prosecuting Hillary per the letter of the law.no one would be prosecuted while sitting as president, they would need to be impeached first.... and then the new sitting president, Pence, would probably pardon him, so he would not ever see a court room....again, idiotic and false.... bordering on delusional.
It's perfectly true. When has anyone ever been prosocuted for obstruction of justice because they fired someone? The answer is never.
The short answer is that no one has ever been prosecuted for obstruction of justice because they fired someone.
the first article of impeachment issued against Richard Nixon and the reason he resigned was for the Saturday night massacre and the obstruction of justice that represented.
one more time with feeling... you can fire someone for any reason or no reason but not for an illegal reason. obstruction is an illegal reason.
and you probably shouldn't take anything he says as true...