Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...

[get_involved]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

 

[Ed Spacer]

Not going to happen. Thank the Bush admin for appointing judges that are tearing the commie dems case apart to bits.lawyer for WH really stumbled.
go to DRUDGE REPORT 2012®

 

[bitterlyclingin]

[Is Donald Verilli that bad a lawyer, or are the cases his bosses, Obama and Holder, are asking him to argue that ridiculiously contemptible? The Big "O" has no intention of enforcing this nations immigration laws because he wants to dilute out those people that hold this nation's heritage, traditions, founders, and its Constitution with some respect. It is especially so because Mr Obama has absolutely no respect himself for any one of them, his ego the size of Michael Moore's @ss.]

"At that time, the local bar was buzzing about a lawyer who had a really bad day in court: he was kicked to death by a moose in the parking lot of the federal courthouse in Anchorage. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli didn’t have that bad a day today in the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that Arizona’s immigration law is invalid by virtue of federal pre-emption, but he was kicked about a good bit by the justices.

On Twitter, Byron York asked: “Question for legal types: Is Donald Verrilli bad at his job or just burdened by having to defend the indefensible?” You can read the entire argument here and draw your own conclusions, but in my opinion, the problem was not with Verrilli but rather with the quality of the arguments that he was required to make by his client, the Obama administration.

Justice Sotomayor was commenting here on an extraordinary aspect of the Obama administration’s position, to the effect that it is OK if individual Arizona law enforcement officers decide to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, but if the state directs them all to cooperate, it is somehow unconstitutional. The Obama administration literally argued that for a state to engage in “systematic cooperation” with the federal government on immigration is unlawful. We can’t blame Mr. Verrilli for his inability to sell that bizarre argument. We do blame Barack Obama and Eric Holder for trying to assert it.

Of course, what is going on here is that the Obama administration doesn’t want to enforce the immigration laws that Congress has enacted. The essence of its position in the Arizona case is that the federal government has the right to decide not to enforce the law, and if it so decides, then no state has the power, under the Constitution, to do anything that would tend to enforce those federal laws. So if the Obama administration decides that it will gain political advantage by ignoring federal laws against illegal immigration, states like Arizona just have to take the consequences without complaining

That proposition–the real essence of the Obama administration’s case–is not one that can survive the light of day. Thus, near the end of Verrilli’s argument, Justice Kennedy cut to the chase:

JUSTICE KENNEDY: So you’re saying the government has a legitimate interest in not enforcing its laws?

GENERAL VERRILLI: No. We have a legitimate interest in enforcing the law, of course, but it needs to be — but these — this Court has said over and over again, has recognized that the — the balance of interest that has to be achieved in enforcing the — the immigration laws is exceedingly delicate and complex, and it involves consideration of foreign relations, it involves humanitarian concerns, and it also involves public order and public –

That answer was incoherent, obviously, but not because Verrilli is a fool; rather, because the Obama administration’s position is indefensible."

A Bad Day In Court for the Obama Administration | Power Line

 

[jillian]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

good for chuck... it won't pass because the repubs will block it.

but that's ok... it reminds hispanic voters what the right thinks of them... you know, while they try to use rubio to bridge a 70 point gap. *shrug*

 

[Conservative]

The Obama administration literally argued that for a state to engage in “systematic cooperation” with the federal government on immigration is unlawful.

BEST part of that post

 

[Conservative]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

good for chuck... it won't pass because the repubs will block it.

but that's ok... it reminds hispanic voters what the right thinks of them... you know, while they try to use rubio to bridge a 70 point gap. *shrug*

No, it reminds LEGAL Hispanic voters what the right thinks of ILLEGAL immigrants who come here and take jobs from LEGAL immigrants and citizens.

 

[jillian]

The Obama administration literally argued that for a state to engage in “systematic cooperation” with the federal government on immigration is unlawful.

BEST part of that post

actually, it doesn't make any sense.

but whatever.

 

[Conservative]

The Obama administration literally argued that for a state to engage in “systematic cooperation” with the federal government on immigration is unlawful.

BEST part of that post

actually, it doesn't make any sense.

but whatever.

you are correct... the Obama administration, telling AZ they cannot have a policy that enforces a federal law, doesn't make sense. Glad we agree on that.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Actually, the hispanics are starting to see how the dems are exploiting them...just like they segregate and isolate every other group for exploitation. But then again, Chuck refers to us all as the serfs, little chatter people.

 

[saveliberty]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

good for chuck... it won't pass because the repubs will block it.

but that's ok... it reminds hispanic voters what the right thinks of them... you know, while they try to use rubio to bridge a 70 point gap. *shrug*

According to the left, Hispanics are leaving the US en masse. How they going to vote? Make up your mind. Either they are leaving or staying.

 

[Katzndogz]

Like Chuck Schumer from New York can understand Arizona.

 

[Claudette]

On would think all Americans would be happy to see the illegals leave the country.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

next they'll be wailing to the UN for help......oh wait......BO already did that....

 

[asaratis]

For Obama and the lefties, enforcing the existing immigration laws would mean fewer votes and fewer welfare recipients...can't have that! No sir!

Obama is a goddamned Marxist. He doesn't care if we open all borders wide open and stop checking papers at all international airports.

 

[AmericanFirst]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

The left hates to lose even when they know they are wrong. Idiots.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Like Chuck Schumer from New York can understand Arizona.

Schmucky schumer doesn't understand America!!!

 

[AmericanFirst]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

good for chuck... it won't pass because the repubs will block it.

but that's ok... it reminds hispanic voters what the right thinks of them... you know, while they try to use rubio to bridge a 70 point gap. *shrug*

It reminds true Americans that the left loves illegal votes and socialism. Idiots.

 

[Clementine]

"And now, New York Senator Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, and the Democrats are threatening to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate the Arizona law if it is upheld by the highest court in the land.

Well, Chucky, go for it."


Dems Vow to Kill AZ Immigration Law?...GO FOR IT. - San Francisco Immigration | Examiner.com

So, Dems don't respect the Supreme Court when it doesn't support them? I thought the court was deciding whether it was constitutional for Arizona and other states to protect their borders. If they deem that it is, how on earth can the Dems legislate against the constitution? Will they ignore the court if health care is shot down?

This is pretty arrogant to say they'll do what they want regardless of whether it is constitutional or not.

 

[Navy1960]

I thought you would like to know what " The Arizona Hispanic Republicans" are saying about this.

… In other words, Rubio opposes offering the youngsters, many of whom are already graduate and post graduate students, the kind of status that would allow them to eventually sponsor immediate family members, much like Rubio’s parents in Cuba were sponsored by his auntie in Florida back in 1956, before Fidel Castro came to power. … The concept of keeping citizenship out of reach for legalized immigrants it’s actually the brainchild of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) a research organization that is part of the same lobbying group that pushed the “attrition thru enforcement” concept and the legal push behind the local and state anti immigration laws such as SB1070, the Arizona Law, that will soon be argued in front of the Supreme Court. CIS, FAIR and the Immigration Reform Law Institute are all part of the same network of organizations in Washington that want to limit not illegal, but LEGAL immigration

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-deportation/2012/04/24/gIQAe6lheT_story.html

Here is the thing, hispanics represent 29.2% of the population here in Arizona and it's growing fast. The stated goal of one the authors of the SB-1070 is not some high minded goal of stopping illegal immigration but rather to more like this. “on track to change the demographic makeup of the entire country. You know, what they call ‘minority-majority,’ ” said Micheal Hethmon. I'll let that statement stand on its own merits, the bills other author who is an associate with Mr. Hethmon is a man by the name of Kris Kobach whos now an advisor to the Romney campaign on immigration issues. So if this bill is upheld, and the court sides with the state of Arizona they what they will in short do, is move that group of voters even more into President Obama's side and even more away from the Republican side. If it is overturned then the Republican party can use that as an issue for immigration reform in the campagin.

As to Arizona itself, this state runs on illegal labor, sadly while some will yell to anyone who will listen about how bad a problem it is, they are the first one's at Home Depot every mornings picking them up to do yard work or paint the house, etc. Most of the the new home construction here in Arizona, the labor for that was done, by you guessed it illegal workers. So while it's good to talk about what we will or won't do the reality of the situation is much different and to simply say , your going to deport 11 million people or they are going to deport themselves is just not going to happen. It might make some people happy in the voting booth, but I venture to guess most in Arizona are not willing to pay 5 times what they pay now for some of the cheap labor they have been used to for the last 100 plus years.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

1070 dupes a law already on the books, already being enforced in ALL states. What do you knee jerkers think that cop is doing when he takes your drivers license back to his squad car? Ask any law enforcement officer Wants, warrants are only part of it.

1070 does not address illegal immigration. We need real immigration reform that addresses the problem at its core cause. We invite them to come here when We hire them and we buy their drugs. Even Mittens said he had to stop hiring illegals because he was running for prez. Even he was afraid he would get caught.

Is there anyone who believes fake ID is hard to get? If college kid can get it, why would anyone think wealthy drug lords arent getting fake IDs by the truck load?

Deal with those facts.

Also, deal with the pubs who have fought against border security while accusing President Obama of not dealing with the border.

McCain and Kyl refused to increase border control when then-governor Napalitano requested it. It was not until she was in charge of HLS and Obama was elected that Border Control was increased. That's a matter of record so don't try to lie about it.

Illegal deportation has increased more under Obama than any other president. I know that galls you rw's but that's also fact. 1070 is used to harass people. Its nothing but a law against driving while brown that is being used to fool gullible rw's to vote for politicians who self-aggrandize but do little.

Go live in Tucson and you see what the reality of illegal immigration. Write your congress person and demand REAL immigration reform.