Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only after one side has won
this post would make sense except for the fact that democrats do not advocate surrender in any way and except for the fact that post #44 has absolutely nothing to do with American democrats whatsoever....so basically, it doesn't make ANY sense.
congratulations RSR, you are a buffoon.
Only in your view
Remember the terms are settled by both sides. And smart victors don't crush their opponents. The Romans knew that. But no matter because here it doesn't apply. The invasion was a success, the occupation is a failure. Time to leave.
and what happened to the Romans?
No war has ended until one side gave up
The Dems are trying win the war for the terrorists
How long has the US Empire been in existence? Fifty, sixty years? How long did the Roman Empire last?
"No war has ended until one side gave up". And this conflicts with my statement that all wars end in armistice in what way?
The Democratic Party can see the occupation of Iraq is an abject failure and they want to stop feeding people to the meat-grinder. You of course, with your slavish devotion to Bush can't deal with the fact that Iraq is the greatest foreign policy failure in US history and your fetish object, Bush, is responsible. Instead your mental blindness and slavish devotion to your fetish object drive you to insist that more and more people are presented to the maw of the meat-grinder. If you're so fucking keen on war then show some guts and enlist, instead of screaming like the chickenhawk you are. Grab your hat, make it a big one, you're going to have to put the white feathers somewhere.
Last I checked the US has been around since 1776
Libs want the US to lose this war - so that is when the terrorists will win.
It was Redi who said the Dems should gain seat in Congress - another slip of the truth from White Flag Harry all he cares about is gaining more power - not on winning the war
show me where any democrat has ever said that we want to LOSE this war.
I'll wait.
Telling the enemy when the US will leave is surrender
Dems care more about power and their party then their country and the troops
no..it is not.... go look up the definition of the word.
try again.....
and start trying to say something of substance and intelligence and please stop repeating those same old campaign slogans. really...you are so boringly predictable
if you do not even know the correct definition of the word surrender, how can you use it incorrectly in a sentence and have that sentence be truthful?
you are not making any sense.... but that is not really news, is it?
When nailed with what Dems say and do, you deny. Then you demand proof. When proof is presented you go back to den=y and say that is not reeally what they did
You tried to the same when you spen one hour lying how Dems did not vote to raise taxes on every wage earners (even retired couples)
what proof are we talking about in this discussion?
Try the Dems surrender date in the bill
again.... no one is surrendering anything to anyone. When we leave, we will turn over our facilities and encampments and assets to the legitimate Iraq government. THat is not surrender at all.