Their evidence was weak a Hell....yet they rushed a vote on impeachment before anyone could find out what exactly happened. Now the Democrats want to introduce more evidence into the trial that wasn't in the original impeachment. Evidence that is simply opinion based in the media.
They claim that what the GOA claims proves their point. It does not. It simply proves that they have friends in the GOA willing to lie to strengthen a very weak case.
I don't care what they say.....everyone knows the president can withhold foreign aid for any reason. Democrats simply want us to believe the reason he withheld it was different from the reason he actually used. It's just their opinion. So in effect....they're trying to convict him for something they literally dreamed up.....not something he actually did. Their negative attitudes are what is on trial here.
Wrap your mind around this for awhile.
They claim that what the GOA claims proves their point. It does not. It simply proves that they have friends in the GOA willing to lie to strengthen a very weak case.
I don't care what they say.....everyone knows the president can withhold foreign aid for any reason. Democrats simply want us to believe the reason he withheld it was different from the reason he actually used. It's just their opinion. So in effect....they're trying to convict him for something they literally dreamed up.....not something he actually did. Their negative attitudes are what is on trial here.
Wrap your mind around this for awhile.
Last edited: