Democrats Are No Longer the Racist Party – If They Ever Really Were

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

 

[MarcATL]

Which party does the president, who has repeatedly failed to condemn white supremacist and neo Nazis belong to.? What party does the president who enjoys the support of racist hate groups belong to.? Which part does the xenophobes and neo confederates flock to?

And what exactly is being said about the Democrats that is true, that I have not acknowledged ? I presented a fair and balanced historical assessment of the Democrats from the civil war through the civil rights era. I did not attempt to white wash the dark side of the Democrats history, but rather, put it in perspective.

\
What is there that you can refute or call a lie?

Nothing. If Republicans didn't lie, they'd have nothing to say.

 

[ATL]

The party label didn't really mean a thing prior to '64, today the understanding is that the GOP is for conservatives and the DEM is for liberals, however, the only thing that stayed constant is ideology. To think George Wallace would vote for anything today other than the GOP is intellectually dishonest.

 

[MarcATL]

Thank you for admitting that you can't refute a damned thing that I said

Statement: Republicans harbors racists.

RW Moron: Chicago!

Statement: The Republican party is preferred by white supremacists, Aryan nation members and racists.

RW Moron: Chicago!

Question: Explain how "Chicago" has anything to do w/the above.

RW Response: If you don't know, you're not paying attention. CHICAGO!!!

That's how much of a damn jackass the poster gooing by iamwhatiseem is.

Him and many of his ilk, because they've all done this same asinine argument.

 

[Correll]

Few things annoy me more than when people who want to stick a thumb in the eye of Democrats resort to tactics such as pointing out they founded the Ku Klux Klan or pushed through Jim Crow laws following the Civil War. The intent seems to be to draw attention away from the party that harbors the racists of today by shaming the Democrats for the sins of our forefathers.

It’s a sleazy tactic that doesn’t work, and It is time to set the record straight....?

This is about as far as I got is that wall of bs.


Your premise, includes the very self serving assumption that the GOP is the "party that harbors the racist of today".


In doing that, you are, ironically making a far worse smear against modern republicans than the smear you are complaining about, where they smear your distance, ideological ancestors.


Not to mention, that what they say is actually true, while you are spewing vile lies, and you know it.

Which party does the president, who has repeatedly failed to condemn white supremacist and neo Nazis belong
to.?

Not the GOP, President Trump has repeatedly condemned various white supremacist and neo Nazis, and only a vile liar would claim otherwise.

What party does the president who enjoys the support of racist hate groups belong to.?

Well, a lot of racists blacks and hispanics love them some dems. YOu ever talk to IM2, or Katstevie on this site? Or Paul E what ever shit? They are the worst racists on this site and they vote for you.

Which part does the xenophobes and neo confederates flock to?

Not sure what you mean.


Xenophobe implies that the fear is irrational.


That's something only a liar or a fool would imply.

Neo Confederates? Are you referring to a movement who wants the South to leave the Union and be an independent nation?

Cause that only way that your question makes any sense.


Never met one. I doubt they exist in RL.

And what exactly is being said about the Democrats that is true, that I have not acknowledged ? I presented a fair and balanced historical assessment of the Democrats from the civil war through the civil rights era. I did not attempt to white wash the dark side of the Democrats history, but rather, put it in perspective.

\
What is there that you can refute or call a lie?

I did not address what you said about dems is your huge wall of, considering the bullshit in the first paragraph, certainly bullshit.

 

[ATL]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

Just like MLK called it.....

“While not himself a racist,” concluded Martin Luther King Jr., “Mr. Goldwater articulates a philosophy which gives aid and comfort to the racists.”

 

[Correll]

Few things annoy me more than when people who want to stick a thumb in the eye of Democrats resort to tactics such as pointing out they founded the Ku Klux Klan or pushed through Jim Crow laws following the Civil War. The intent seems to be to draw attention away from the party that harbors the racists of today by shaming the Democrats for the sins of our forefathers.

It’s a sleazy tactic that doesn’t work, and It is time to set the record straight....?

This is about as far as I got is that wall of bs.


Your premise, includes the very self serving assumption that the GOP is the "party that harbors the racist of today".


In doing that, you are, ironically making a far worse smear against modern republicans than the smear you are complaining about, where they smear your distance, ideological ancestors.


Not to mention, that what they say is actually true, while you are spewing vile lies, and you know it.

It is doubtful that you can prove the OP is lying.

Sometimes the ugly truth feels like a "vile smear".

So far no one has posted a single link to a credible source to counter his facts.

Well, if you completely blind hate filled partisans are the judge, then no, I can't.


And all you have to do to "prove" your vile smear is make it.


In your own little, and utterly closed minds.


His "Facts"? LOL!!!

Thank you for admitting that you can't refute a damned thing that I said

Wow.

By just completely misrepresenting what I just said, you just proved my point, that you are completely dishonest and would stone wall any argument, no matter how well presented or supported.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a potted plant.

 

[IM2]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

This is another one of the conservatives weak attempts at defection. While they will not say not all democrats, we are expected use a disclaimer every time we talk about them saying not all republicans are this or that. The republican party is the racist party. Period. Think what you want about what was said..

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Few things annoy me more than when people who want to stick a thumb in the eye of Democrats resort to tactics such as pointing out they founded the Ku Klux Klan or pushed through Jim Crow laws following the Civil War. The intent seems to be to draw attention away from the party that harbors the racists of today by shaming the Democrats for the sins of our forefathers.

It’s a sleazy tactic that doesn’t work, and It is time to set the record straight....?

This is about as far as I got is that wall of bs.


Your premise, includes the very self serving assumption that the GOP is the "party that harbors the racist of today".


In doing that, you are, ironically making a far worse smear against modern republicans than the smear you are complaining about, where they smear your distance, ideological ancestors.


Not to mention, that what they say is actually true, while you are spewing vile lies, and you know it.

It is doubtful that you can prove the OP is lying.

Sometimes the ugly truth feels like a "vile smear".

So far no one has posted a single link to a credible source to counter his facts.

Well, if you completely blind hate filled partisans are the judge, then no, I can't.


And all you have to do to "prove" your vile smear is make it.


In your own little, and utterly closed minds.


His "Facts"? LOL!!!

Thank you for admitting that you can't refute a damned thing that I said

Wow.

By just completely misrepresenting what I just said, you just proved my point, that you are completely dishonest and would stone wall any argument, no matter how well presented or supported.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a potted plant.

Horseshit. How did I misrepresent you?. You did not even make a case for whatever it is that your trying to covey. All that you do is spew vitriol about liberals. You could not refute my points and I called you on it. How the fuck is that misrepresentation? Learn how to have an adult conversation or stop wasting my time.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Not the GOP, President Trump has repeatedly condemned various white supremacist and neo Nazis, and only a vile liar would claim otherwise.

Bullshit, on the one occasion that he issued a half ass rebuke, he took it back the next day.Og course you will pretent to not remember, or you suffer from dementia and really don't.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Well, a lot of racists blacks and hispanics love them some dems. YOu ever talk to IM2, or Katstevie on this site? Or Paul E what ever shit? They are the worst racists on this site and they vote for you.

I never said that there were no minority racists who have a problem with whites. But what you are doing is just to try to create a smoke screen to deflect away from the human detritus that is Trump and his supporters.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Xenophobe implies that the fear is irrational.

You don't know English very well, do you? Or, you just trying to pull some shit here

xen·o·pho·bi·a
[ˌzenəˈfōbēə, ˌzēnəˈfōbēə]
NOUN

1. intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.
   "the resurgence of racism and xenophobia"
   synonyms: racism · racialism · racial hatred · ethnocentrism · ethnocentricity ·
   [more]

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Neo Confederates? Are you referring to a movement who wants the South to leave the Union and be an independent nation?

Cause that only way that your question makes any sense.

There are in fact Neo Confederates who advocate succession but that is not the only definition.

Neo-Confederate

Neo Confederacy also incorporates advocacy of traditional gender roles, is hostile toward democracy, strongly opposes homosexuality and exhibits an understanding of race that favors segregation and suggests white supremacy.

An overall conservative ideology, neo-Confederacy has made inroads into the Republican Party from the political right and overlaps with the views of white nationalists and other more radical extremist groups.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I did not address what you said about dems is your huge wall of, considering the bullshit in the first paragraph, certainly bullshit.

That makes no fucking sense . What bullshit? You can't just call bullshit with out explaining how you think that its bullshit. Otherwise, it is nothing but, well ....BULLSHIT and WORTHLESS BULLSHIT AT THAT.

 

[opinionator]

Racists are found in both parties and in all races. In fact, we all have some sort of prejudice against someone or something. Being racist is an ideology. Having some level of prejudicial thinking is natural.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

And I asked, as in asylum or what? Giving aid and comfort to the enemy? Providing bed and board? What? What exactly do you mean the Republican party "harbors" racists?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

This is another one of the conservatives weak attempts at defection. While they will not say not all democrats, we are expected use a disclaimer every time we talk about them saying not all republicans are this or that. The republican party is the racist party. Period. Think what you want about what was said..

I will not say "all democrats are not..." but you essentially say "all republicans are racists". You don't see the inherent hypocrisy here?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

And I asked, as in asylum or what? Giving aid and comfort to the enemy? Providing bed and board? What? What exactly do you mean the Republican party "harbors" racists?

Are you playing games now or just being obtuse? Maybe "harbor" was not the best word. How "attract" or "welcome"? Is that better? . But you knew that already, didn't you?

 

[IM2]

I think that some whites are far too quick to use the "everyone is a racist" line. Why would blacks today not like whites? Is there any white republican here who can honestly answer that question?

 

[IM2]

That's rich considering that you just said that the Republican party "harbors racists".

Just a statement of fact

As in, the Republican party gives them asylum or something?

You cited the logical fallacy of the appeal to hypocrisy so let me cite one you are guilty of:

Dicto simpliciter (spoken simply, i.e., sweeping generalization). This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping. Example: "Women are on average not as strong as men and less able to carry a gun. Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).

Except Bud, that did not say that all republicans are racists. I said that the Republican Party HARBORS racists. Not saying that they are all the same.

This is another one of the conservatives weak attempts at defection. While they will not say not all democrats, we are expected use a disclaimer every time we talk about them saying not all republicans are this or that. The republican party is the racist party. Period. Think what you want about what was said..

I will not say "all democrats are not..." but you essentially say "all republicans are racists". You don't see the inherent hypocrisy here?

I don't see any hypocrisy. I haven't said all of anything and every time I'm talking about whites or republicans I'm not going to keep saying not all before I say anything.