Democrat Mayor Calls 911 on Petition Signers at Walmart for ‘Harassment’

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,818
62,702
2,605
Right coast, classified
A Washington mayor claims she’s being harassed after calling 911 to report “far right-wing” petitioners at Walmart seeking signatures for ballots on taxes, parental rights, and police pursuits.


Now tell me there’s no sign that Democrats are in full banana republic fascist mode. How dare anyone gather signatures on a petition! Have them arrested and indicted!

 
At least she's not as surface ugly as most dems.

yakima-mayor-city-photo.jpg


OIP.0fdvBLz2mjOpqJ4gDeQUKQAAAA
 
A Washington mayor claims she’s being harassed after calling 911 to report “far right-wing” petitioners at Walmart seeking signatures for ballots on taxes, parental rights, and police pursuits.
Now tell me there’s no sign that Democrats are in full banana republic fascist mode. How dare anyone gather signatures on a petition! Have them arrested and indicted!

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It's right there, in black and white, in the First Amendment to our nation's Constitution; and incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment to all lesser levels of government as well. The people have a right to peaceably assemble, and collect signatures on a petition.

There is and can be no excuse whatsoever for Mayor Deccio's behavior in this matter. She has openly, willfully, deliberately attacked the First Amendment rights of the very people that she is supposed to serve and represent. She should be, at the very least, removed from office for this offense.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It's right there, in black and white, in the First Amendment to our nation's Constitution; and incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment to all lesser levels of government as well. The people have a right to peaceably assemble, and collect signatures on a petition.

There is and can be no excuse whatsoever for Mayor Deccio's behavior in this matter. She has openly, willfully, deliberately attacked the First Amendment rights of the very people that she is supposed to serve and represent. She should be, at the very least, removed from office for this offense.
Then why can't people protest at the houses of Supreme Court judges?
 
Then why can't people protest at the houses of Supreme Court judges?

Because people have a right to security and peace in their own homes. Even if you could make a case for violating that right of a person in a position of political power, there is no case you can make to justify doing that to all his neighbors as well, who are not party to whatever dispute the criminals “protesters” may think they have with the politician, and who don't deserve to have their own homes and neighborhoods disrupted.
 
Because people have a right to security and peace in their own homes. Even if you could make a case for violating that right of a person in a position of political power, there is no case you can make to justify doing that to all his neighbors as well, who are not party to whatever dispute the criminals “protesters” may think they have with the politician, and who don't deserve to have their own homes and neighborhoods disrupted.
Because it is private property just like at Wal-Mart. The gov. can only secure your rights on public property...
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It's right there, in black and white, in the First Amendment to our nation's Constitution; and incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment to all lesser levels of government as well. The people have a right to peaceably assemble, and collect signatures on a petition.

There is and can be no excuse whatsoever for Mayor Deccio's behavior in this matter. She has openly, willfully, deliberately attacked the First Amendment rights of the very people that she is supposed to serve and represent. She should be, at the very least, removed from office for this offense.

The Constitution does not grant you the right to protest on private property if the property owner does not want you there BUT it appears the state has passed a law allowing it, so it is legal.
 
Because people have a right to security and peace in their own homes. Even if you could make a case for violating that right of a person in a position of political power, there is no case you can make to justify doing that to all his neighbors as well, who are not party to whatever dispute the criminals “protesters” may think they have with the politician, and who don't deserve to have their own homes and neighborhoods disrupted.
So make up your mind. The constitution doesn't say it's only OK to assemble as long as it doesn't inconvienence anyone.
 
The Constitution does not grant you the right to protest on private property if the property owner does not want you there BUT it appears the state has passed a law allowing it, so it is legal.
State law can't supersede federal law on Constitutional matters.
 
So make up your mind. The constitution doesn't say it's only OK to assemble as long as it doesn't inconvienence [sic] anyone.

What it explicitly affirms is a right to peaceably assemble.

Disrupting people's right to enjoy peace and security in their own homes, in their own neighborhoods, is not peaceable, and therefore not Constitutionally protected.
 
Then why can't people protest at the houses of Supreme Court judges?



Thats not the same as trying to collect signatures on a petition, Is it?

How can you possibly even come up with that type of comparison?
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It's right there, in black and white, in the First Amendment to our nation's Constitution; and incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment to all lesser levels of government as well. The people have a right to peaceably assemble, and collect signatures on a petition.

There is and can be no excuse whatsoever for Mayor Deccio's behavior in this matter. She has openly, willfully, deliberately attacked the First Amendment rights of the very people that she is supposed to serve and represent. She should be, at the very least, removed from office for this offense.
Courts already have ruled Democrats violated the 1st Amendment. Hasn’t phased the fascists one bit.
 
It appears Washington state law says this is legal, so there isn't anything Walmart can do short of a court order. The irony here is that given the Democratic Party has controlled Washington state government for a long time they probably put this law into place to protect their own canvassers and now it's being used against them.
 
Petitions are fine when you want to keep a conservative speaker from speaking at a University and fine when you want to protect illegal aliens and looters but when a liberal politician is involved all of a sudden petitions are evil. No surprises here.
 
Little diaper wearer soils herself over differing viewpoints and feels the urge to call law enforcement(which she likely disdains for all other matters)
 

Forum List

Back
Top