Hearsay is all they have, what a clown show!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dem Rep Admits None Of The Witnesses Dems Called Last Week Had Firsthand Knowledge Or Evidence
- Thread starter Weatherman2020
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #3
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,128
- 16,311
- 2,180
Yep the guys with the first hand knowledge are under subpoena to testify. With all their yammering about fair process and all, why are the Republicans supporting such Obstruction of Congress. Don't they want to get to the truth of the matter?
What do you want?
The con on audio admitting it?
Oh, they have that now?
Restaurant call doesn't count?
The con was so loud the whole table could hear.
Info wars, no point in reading further.It's ok, next week, new clowns.
A con supporter.
Taxes???
Nice cut off of the congressman's answer....
It's true as of yet, the Democrats don't have Mulveny, don't have Bolton, don't have Rick Perry, don't have the VP or the President, or the National Security council's Deputy Director nor, the OMB Deputy Director etc, nor any of the evidence they subpoenaed... they don't even have the full transcript of the 2 calls, one of them put in to a SCIF level above Top Secret vault.... Nor Giuliani, and the two goons, Igor and Lev.... all the first hand evidence and first hand witnesses that could shed some light...
HOWEVER
THE PRESIDENT has illegally stopped all of those witnesses from testifying and has not turned over a single shred of evidence subpoenaed....
Kind of hard for your side to complain about Congress not having first hand witnesses when it is the president preventing their appearances....
There are 2 first hand witnesses this week coming up though, Amb Sondland is one... on Wednesday....
It's true as of yet, the Democrats don't have Mulveny, don't have Bolton, don't have Rick Perry, don't have the VP or the President, or the National Security council's Deputy Director nor, the OMB Deputy Director etc, nor any of the evidence they subpoenaed... they don't even have the full transcript of the 2 calls, one of them put in to a SCIF level above Top Secret vault.... Nor Giuliani, and the two goons, Igor and Lev.... all the first hand evidence and first hand witnesses that could shed some light...
HOWEVER
THE PRESIDENT has illegally stopped all of those witnesses from testifying and has not turned over a single shred of evidence subpoenaed....
Kind of hard for your side to complain about Congress not having first hand witnesses when it is the president preventing their appearances....
There are 2 first hand witnesses this week coming up though, Amb Sondland is one... on Wednesday....
The con won't let the first hand guys testify.Yep the guys with the first hand knowledge are under subpoena to testify. With all their yammering about fair process and all, why are the Republicans supporting such Obstruction of Congress. Don't they want to get to the truth of the matter?
And now, the con who has no idea of what "under oath" means might testify?
Can we take bets?
You forgot pros peeing on his drapes and bed
Reminds me of the kid who killed his parents and then asked for leniency because he was an orphan.Nice cut off of the congressman's answer....
It's true as of yet, the Democrats don't have Mulveny, don't have Bolton, don't have Rick Perry, don't have the VP or the President, or the National Security council's Deputy Director nor, the OMB Deputy Director etc, nor any of the evidence they subpoenaed... they don't even have the full transcript of the 2 calls, one of them put in to a SCIF level above Top Secret vault.... Nor Giuliani, and the two goons, Igor and Lev.... all the first hand evidence and first hand witnesses that could shed some light...
HOWEVER
THE PRESIDENT has illegally stopped all of those witnesses from testifying and has not turned over a single shred of evidence subpoenaed....
Kind of hard for your side to complain about Congress not having first hand witnesses when it is the president preventing their appearances....
There are 2 first hand witnesses this week coming up though, Amb Sondland is one... on Wednesday....
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,176
- 1,590
Nice cut off of the congressman's answer....
It's true as of yet, the Democrats don't have Mulveny, don't have Bolton, don't have Rick Perry, don't have the VP or the President, or the National Security council's Deputy Director nor, the OMB Deputy Director etc, nor any of the evidence they subpoenaed... they don't even have the full transcript of the 2 calls, one of them put in to a SCIF level above Top Secret vault.... Nor Giuliani, and the two goons, Igor and Lev.... all the first hand evidence and first hand witnesses that could shed some light...
HOWEVER
THE PRESIDENT has illegally stopped all of those witnesses from testifying and has not turned over a single shred of evidence subpoenaed....
Kind of hard for your side to complain about Congress not having first hand witnesses when it is the president preventing their appearances....
There are 2 first hand witnesses this week coming up though, Amb Sondland is one... on Wednesday....
With a name like care4all, you should care more for facts.
Watching something other than the CNN could be a promising start.
- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,252
- 84,089
- 3,635
The best Schiff can hope for is to Get Trump to testify in person, then try to get him in a perjury trap for "lying to Congress" or some such BS. That's what Mueller did, so watch for it.
Don't think they're smart enough to pull that off though.
Don't think they're smart enough to pull that off though.
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 27,842
- 16,991
- 1,415
The phone call is an exhonoration and not evidence. Is the sky still purple to you?Silly Trumpites think that phone call is the only evidence being submitted.
- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,252
- 84,089
- 3,635
Silly Trumpites think that phone call is the only evidence being submitted.
If that's the case, why has every witness the Dems called up were about the phone call?
You have nothing, unless you fabricate something.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
The phone call is an exhonoration and not evidence. Is the sky still purple to you?Silly Trumpites think that phone call is the only evidence being submitted.
Even if the inaccurate summary of that phone call did exonerate Trump, which it doesn't, it would still be evidence dummy.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,264
- 30,549
- 2,250
Silly Trumpites think that phone call is the only evidence being submitted.
If that's the case, why has every witness the Dems called up were about the phone call?
You have nothing, unless you fabricate something.
You think that call was the only thing discussed? You need to go back and read the transcripts.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 78
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 108
- Views
- 860
- Replies
- 148
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 54
- Views
- 483
- Replies
- 78
- Views
- 628
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8111
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-