I've pointed out before that Romney has become better in debates but he's still lousy at it. He sounds like a CEO pontificating about his views on how things will be done. The problem with that is that he's not at a board meeting, and his "ideas" are subject to challenge. And he's bad at retorts. The "10,000 dollar bet" was one thing..but his reponse to Gingrich on PAC commercials was classic. First he said he had nothing to do with them, didn't see them and by law, couldn't influence their content. Then he went on to say that former staffers populated the people making them, friends and supporters were financing them and went point by point on why their content was correct. You can't make this stuff up. Aside from that, he's easily flustered and when not on message appears angry. He tries to use corporate jargon to appear intelligent, but anyone familiar with the lingo..gets it.