Oddball
Unobtanium Member
The term "denier" is itself a talking point.And the term talking points could just as easily be applied to most of the pro-AGW claims as well
-----------------------------------
What talking points have I presented? I speak for on one else but myself, so please limit it to that. I presented a logical syllogism, which can either be valid or invalid, if it has a flaw. If you can find it, please do, but don't dismiss it as a talking point. It's the way real scientists do real science. Talking points are the realm of the political flack and 99.9% of the AGW deniers.
What you presented is projection, not syllogism, as the UN and IPCC are as political as you can get. Likewise, your claim that all the skeptics have are a few "stolen" e-mails is simplistic to the point of absurdity.
Like the bulk of anthropogenic global warming...er...."climate change" science fiction, it flunks the smell test in terms of both structure and content.