ConHog
Rookie
- Jun 4, 2010
- 14,538
- 951
- 0
- Banned
- #21
Without having all the details I think a 67 year old homeless man would be in less than optimal condition. I think the employee of the burger king had help at his disposal and did not have to kill the man to subdue him. I think he should be charged with voluntary manslaughter.
Wrong charge Willow, to qualify as voluntary manslaughter the perpetrator would have had to have been trying to kill the man. Not the case here. He should be, and probably will be, charged with negligent homicide as he didn't intend to kill the man, but his actions clearly led to his death.