Dante and Yurts Debate

Discussion in 'Bull Ring Discussions and Call-Outs' started by cereal_killer, Feb 1, 2013.

  1. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,327
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,075
  2. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,688
    Thanks Received:
    2,727
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,120
    Thanks Dante
    would you and Yurt care to extend the debate/discussion
    to how can there be public health care, and legalization of pot and drugs.

    Wouldn't the public disagree on paying for health care for
    people who deliberately ruin their health with recreational drugs,
    including denying any such risks or damage to health is real?

    How would either of you propose to manage the
    free choice of drug use and mandate paying for public health.
    How would that work?

    Would people who incur higher costs due to, say, drunk driving,
    or brain damage or inability to work because of drug addiction
    be required to pay that so it isn't charged to taxpayers to pay for
    welfare or health care benefits except under terms they AGREE to pay for.

    Would this require separate tracks or programs for people who
    believe in funding abortion, drug use, etc as a free choice
    vs. people who DON'T believe in paying for those things they DON'T consider fair choices.

    Would you leave it to a vote and just let states and people fight to
    push one agenda or another by majority rule or court ruling?
     

Share This Page