Discussion in 'Bull Ring Discussions and Call-Outs' started by cereal_killer, Feb 1, 2013.
Emily: Yurt v Dante US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
would you and Yurt care to extend the debate/discussion
to how can there be public health care, and legalization of pot and drugs.
Wouldn't the public disagree on paying for health care for
people who deliberately ruin their health with recreational drugs,
including denying any such risks or damage to health is real?
How would either of you propose to manage the
free choice of drug use and mandate paying for public health.
How would that work?
Would people who incur higher costs due to, say, drunk driving,
or brain damage or inability to work because of drug addiction
be required to pay that so it isn't charged to taxpayers to pay for
welfare or health care benefits except under terms they AGREE to pay for.
Would this require separate tracks or programs for people who
believe in funding abortion, drug use, etc as a free choice
vs. people who DON'T believe in paying for those things they DON'T consider fair choices.
Would you leave it to a vote and just let states and people fight to
push one agenda or another by majority rule or court ruling?
Separate names with a comma.