Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
nobody cares about electric cars
LOLOL. The walleyedretard is spewing more of his ignorant denier cult myths, I see. Total BS of course.LOLOLOL.....so you're still totally retarded, eh kookster....here's another electric car that is selling pretty well.....but all of these are just preliminary models.....watch what happens in the next few years when the next generation lithium batteries come into production and plug-in pure electric vehicles can go 3 or 4 hundred miles on a charge that only takes 10 minutes.....since electrics are way cheaper to drive per mile than gasoline powered cars, everyone with more than half a brain is going to want one....not you, of course, kookster, considering the peanut sized brain you're cursed with.....
Tesla to start deliveries of Model S electric cars next month
By Jerry Hirsch
Los Angeles Times
May 22, 2012
(excerpts)
Tesla Motors Inc. said it will begin delivering its first mass production electric car - the high-end Model S to customers starting June 22, about a month ahead of the expected schedule. The Palo Alto-based company says it has more than 10,000 orders for the battery-powered car but that not all will be delivered this year. The sedan offers seating for five adults and, in some configurations, room for an extra two children's seats. It also is to have some speed, with an anticipated zero-to-60-mph acceleration of less than six seconds. The price of the Model S ranges from $49,900 to $97,900, depending on its mileage range and options and after a federal $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. Early sales will be of the most expensive model. Morgan Stanley, the investment bank, forecast that Tesla will sell close to 3,000 cars this year, 16,000 next year and 19,000 the following year.
No, dear boy they are not "way cheaper". they cost more per mile to drive than a fossil fueled car.
The cost of the necessary electricity to take an EV one mile is less than a fourth of the cost of the gasoline used by a regular car to go a mile. Except for the current generation of batteries, maintenance costs are almost nil for EVs because they have only about half a dozen moving parts rather the 150 to 200 in gasoline engine cars. Current generation EV batteries are about the only problem because they don't last as long as the vehicle but that is going to change radically with the next generation lithium batteries (and possibly super-capacitors too) that can take a vehicle 300 to 400 miles on a charge and last longer than the life of the vehicle. Even now the overall costs of an EV are less than regular gas cars.
Electric Cars--How Much Does It Cost per Charge?
Scientific American
Comparing Energy Costs per Mile for Electric and Gasoline Vehicles
United States Department of Energy
Electric Car Cost Per Mile
Add to that the toxic nature of the batteries when they fail and the associated cost to exchange them out and the cost goes up yet again. Then when you consider you can buy an equivalent car for 28,000 and the cost differential is that much greater. Nice try but real world mathematics bites you in the ass yet again.
Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environmentA literature review
The next generation solid lithium metal polymer batteries solve all of the problems you obsess over in your crackpot attempt to denigrate the new and better technologies that threaten to cut the profits of your puppet-masters in the fossil fuel industry.
Cost-effective EV battery passes German tests, recharges in minutes
April 12th 2011
Lithium Jolt: DBM Energy: This Breakthrough Will Soon Slash EV Prices Drastically
September 04, 2011
Lithium Jolt: Where Are you - Lithium Wonder Battery?
January 05, 2012
Toyota Develops New Electric Car Battery
May 24, 2012
nobody cares about electric cars
CORRECTION: Nobody like the kookster with an IQ lower than room temperature cares about electric cars.
Of course, everybody with more than half a brain is overjoyed that we'll finally be getting clean, non-polluting transportation that will be way cheaper to operate than the horribly inefficient, overly complicated internal combustion engine vehicles that poison our air and change our climate.
And yet the kookster with a low IQ is bitchslapalooza-ing you and your super duper intelligencia at every turn. Guess you're not so bright after all.....nobody cares about electric cars
CORRECTION: Nobody like the kookster with an IQ lower than room temperature cares about electric cars.
Of course, everybody with more than half a brain is overjoyed that we'll finally be getting clean, non-polluting transportation that will be way cheaper to operate than the horribly inefficient, overly complicated internal combustion engine vehicles that poison our air and change our climate.
Just more of your cowardly BS and avoidance so you don't have to face the facts that you want so badly to distort and spin for your political agenda.Two of your links had Trojans so I didn't bother to go any further. How about doing a cut and paste so i don't have to risk my computer with your viruses.LOLOL. The walleyedretard is spewing more of his ignorant denier cult myths, I see. Total BS of course.No, dear boy they are not "way cheaper". they cost more per mile to drive than a fossil fueled car.
The cost of the necessary electricity to take an EV one mile is less than a fourth of the cost of the gasoline used by a regular car to go a mile. Except for the current generation of batteries, maintenance costs are almost nil for EVs because they have only about half a dozen moving parts rather the 150 to 200 in gasoline engine cars. Current generation EV batteries are about the only problem because they don't last as long as the vehicle but that is going to change radically with the next generation lithium batteries (and possibly super-capacitors too) that can take a vehicle 300 to 400 miles on a charge and last longer than the life of the vehicle. Even now the overall costs of an EV are less than regular gas cars.
Electric Cars--How Much Does It Cost per Charge?
Scientific American
Comparing Energy Costs per Mile for Electric and Gasoline Vehicles
United States Department of Energy
Electric Car Cost Per Mile
Add to that the toxic nature of the batteries when they fail and the associated cost to exchange them out and the cost goes up yet again. Then when you consider you can buy an equivalent car for 28,000 and the cost differential is that much greater. Nice try but real world mathematics bites you in the ass yet again.
Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environmentA literature review
The next generation solid lithium metal polymer batteries solve all of the problems you obsess over in your crackpot attempt to denigrate the new and better technologies that threaten to cut the profits of your puppet-masters in the fossil fuel industry.
Cost-effective EV battery passes German tests, recharges in minutes
April 12th 2011
Lithium Jolt: DBM Energy: This Breakthrough Will Soon Slash EV Prices Drastically
September 04, 2011
Lithium Jolt: Where Are you - Lithium Wonder Battery?
January 05, 2012
Toyota Develops New Electric Car Battery
May 24, 2012
nobody cares about electric cars
CORRECTION: Nobody like the kookster with an IQ lower than room temperature cares about electric cars.
Of course, everybody with more than half a brain is overjoyed that we'll finally be getting clean, non-polluting transportation that will be way cheaper to operate than the horribly inefficient, overly complicated internal combustion engine vehicles that poison our air and change our climate.
And yet the kookster with a low IQ is bitchslapalooza-ing you and your super duper intelligencia at every turn. Guess you're not so bright after all.....
And they arent going anywhere for a long, long time. Lifespan of these beautiful machines is 30 years and at a cost of 2.5 million each, dollar to a stale donut most will be in service well into the 2030's!!!
Just more of your cowardly BS and avoidance so you don't have to face the facts that you want so badly to distort and spin for your political agenda.Two of your links had Trojans so I didn't bother to go any further. How about doing a cut and paste so i don't have to risk my computer with your viruses.LOLOL. The walleyedretard is spewing more of his ignorant denier cult myths, I see. Total BS of course.
The cost of the necessary electricity to take an EV one mile is less than a fourth of the cost of the gasoline used by a regular car to go a mile. Except for the current generation of batteries, maintenance costs are almost nil for EVs because they have only about half a dozen moving parts rather the 150 to 200 in gasoline engine cars. Current generation EV batteries are about the only problem because they don't last as long as the vehicle but that is going to change radically with the next generation lithium batteries (and possibly super-capacitors too) that can take a vehicle 300 to 400 miles on a charge and last longer than the life of the vehicle. Even now the overall costs of an EV are less than regular gas cars.
Electric Cars--How Much Does It Cost per Charge?
Scientific American
Comparing Energy Costs per Mile for Electric and Gasoline Vehicles
United States Department of Energy
Electric Car Cost Per Mile
Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environmentA literature review
The next generation solid lithium metal polymer batteries solve all of the problems you obsess over in your crackpot attempt to denigrate the new and better technologies that threaten to cut the profits of your puppet-masters in the fossil fuel industry.
Cost-effective EV battery passes German tests, recharges in minutes
April 12th 2011
Lithium Jolt: DBM Energy: This Breakthrough Will Soon Slash EV Prices Drastically
September 04, 2011
Lithium Jolt: Where Are you - Lithium Wonder Battery?
January 05, 2012
Toyota Develops New Electric Car Battery
May 24, 2012
Just more of your cowardly BS and avoidance so you don't have to face the facts that you want so badly to distort and spin for your political agenda.Two of your links had Trojans so I didn't bother to go any further. How about doing a cut and paste so i don't have to risk my computer with your viruses.
No, two of your links had trojan horse viruses attached to them. I choose not to risk my computer with your BS nonsense. If you wish to discuss what they have to say then post excerpts otherwise it is just a load of crap designed to damage computers.
Which, from a unethical twerp like you, is not surprising.
)
But check out my latest thread on Shell Oil. Not losing!!!
Just more of your cowardly BS and avoidance so you don't have to face the facts that you want so badly to distort and spin for your political agenda.
No, two of your links had trojan horse viruses attached to them. I choose not to risk my computer with your BS nonsense. If you wish to discuss what they have to say then post excerpts otherwise it is just a load of crap designed to damage computers.
Which, from a unethical twerp like you, is not surprising.
West bro............cant tell you how much of a kick I get out of you and wire and Ian publically humiliating this clown RT. I literally come on her late at night and laugh my balls off.............particularly at the mental meltdown responses after he's pwned ( I think its a he???
Hey West.............for all the green cheerleading you get on here from the k00ks, youd think we'll all be driving a Nissan Leaf next year!!!
LOLOL.....you'll say anything to avoid acknowledging the facts, walleyed. I posted eight links. Are you incapable of naming the specific ones that you claim are 'infected'? Was it the Scientific American site or the US Dept of Energy? LOL. You old fraud. You're just afraid to face the facts about your denier cult delusions. But OK, I'll humor your delusions and fears and post some relevant excerpts.No, two of your links had trojan horse viruses attached to them. I choose not to risk my computer with your BS nonsense. If you wish to discuss what they have to say then post excerpts otherwise it is just a load of crap designed to damage computers.Just more of your cowardly BS and avoidance so you don't have to face the facts that you want so badly to distort and spin for your political agenda.Two of your links had Trojans so I didn't bother to go any further. How about doing a cut and paste so i don't have to risk my computer with your viruses.
Which, from a unethical twerp like you, is not surprising.
And what of the logistics of powering up? To the green left, its not even considered that grids carry a price tag. To them, its an automatic to just throw another tax at the people, as if they will all accept it with open arms!!!
For most people, economics and sound reason trump idealism.
Porsche shows off 918 Spyder Prototype
Altogether, the gas-electric drivetrain should be good for a 3.1-second 0-60 sprint and a top speed of 199 mph. Perhaps even more impressive is the news that the 918 will be able to propel itself with electric power at speeds of up to 94 mph. That little fact helps account for the news that the vehicle should be able to return around 78 miles per gallon on the EU cycle. Scroll down for the brief press release, but not before checking out the high-res gallery.
Show full PR text
No, two of your links had trojan horse viruses attached to them. I choose not to risk my computer with your BS nonsense. If you wish to discuss what they have to say then post excerpts otherwise it is just a load of crap designed to damage computers.
Which, from a unethical twerp like you, is not surprising.
ROTFLMAO......too, too funny....one of the most reality challenged retards on here wants to talk about "Realville".....LOLOLOLOLOLOL.....In Realville though, the advent of the EC is not in question from anybody...........but the implication made by the green radicals that we are months away from everybody driving EC's is scary naive...............like the advances in battery technology and then briniging it to market in any meaningful way is right there on the horizon.
In Realville...........its not........its decades away. Why? Because thats how the markets work and far left guys dont understand markets. Never have. These people never give it a second thought that the internal combution engine market will adapt with their own technological advances perpetuating the fucked up economy of scale for the EC. ............The far left guys think that the battery makers are develping this technology because they care about the environment. And its like from their perspective, the internal combustion engine doesnt exist and these folks are going to lay down and just let the EC take over for the betterment of the planet!!
In Realville, the grand design is far, far more complicated than wishing for something based upon, ummm.........wishful thinking. Green leaning people will always be OK with paying a premium to be able to drive an electric car. But the majority?
But that is why skooks is around here...........to bring it all back to Realville when wishful thiinking becomes k00k. To many on the far left.............Realville sucks
The Future Of Electric Vehicles: Who? Where? When? How Much? How Many? | The Truth About Cars
Preparing For The Electric Car Future - Forbes.com
Shove one out of a C130 at 10,000 feet and it will do about 124mph for a short burst. Batteries are for toys and will never be a suitable substitute for petroleum products.
